Good bye Global Warming Theory

[Bob_bear]

Jimmie .... i've looked at both sides and didn't buy the Global Warming Kool Aid.

In MHO all you have to do is follow the money. Great example, Al Gore, he may not be living what he speaks but his bank account has benefited. Just look back at the Y2K hipe, the DOT COM bubble and now Global Warming.

However, this is the best of these ponzee games since it projects doom and gloom years in the future giving them years to rake in the bucks.

[hyo silver]

Originally Posted by Bob_bear

...In MHO all you have to do is follow the money...

Climate change researchers have more money than the oil industry?

[F8L]

Originally Posted by Bob_bear

Jimmie .... i've looked at both sides and didn't buy the Global Warming Kool Aid.

In MHO all you have to do is follow the money. Great example, Al Gore, he may not be living what he speaks but his bank account has benefited. Just look back at the Y2K hipe, the DOT COM bubble and now Global Warming.

However, this is the best of these ponzee games since it projects doom and gloom years in the future giving them years to rake in the bucks.

The fact you even mentioned Al Gore in a global warming debate automatically grants you a flag on the play and a 10 yard penalty. Al Gore is not a scientist so please refrain from going political on us and make your arguments based on the science.

Are you refuting that CO2 is a potent green house gas or it's effects on passing shortwave radition yet blocking longwave radiation? Are you denying that the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are abnormally high in human history/prehistory?

[tripp]

Originally Posted by Bob_bear

In MHO all you have to do is follow the money. Great example, Al Gore, he may not be living what he speaks but his bank account has benefited. Just look back at the Y2K hipe, the DOT COM bubble and now Global Warming.

I've never understood this argument. Do you have any idea how small the alternative energy money pot is compared to conventional energy? The subsidies for Coal/Nuke/Gas/Oil dwarf the peanuts handed out to wind/solar/geothermal. It's a sick joke.

Y2K was a serious issue. Had bsuinesses done nowt it would have been a major issue, but people were proactive and corrected before the notorious date. It's not like people sat on their hands and then nothing happened. What the hell does the Dot Com bubble have to do with this?

[bac]

Originally Posted by hyo silver

Climate change researchers have more money than the oil industry?

+1

... Brad

[Alric]

Just breaking out the old graphs. There is new data on borehole temperature measurements.

[richard schumacher]

Of course, follow the money! First the astronomers got rich on the Copernican hoax, then the biologists got rich on the evilution hoax, the physicists got doubly rich with the relativity and quantum mechanics hoaxes, the astronomers double-dippered with the Big Bang hoax, and the geologists got rich on the plate tectonics hoax. Now quite naturally the climatologists want their turn with the global warming hoax.

For discussion of the facts of global warming by atmospheric physicists and climatologists see RealClimate

[MegansPrius]

Originally Posted by Bob_FJ

Typical left wing nonsense in the lead post!

Quite randomly, I did an extensive Google type search on one of the listed institutes alleged to support AGW, and found:

The Indian Academy does NOT support the AGW nonsense.

Would you like me to discuss the politics of the APU? (American Physical Union)

You're wrong. The Indian National Science Academy does, and in fact even signed a statment to that effect. Got a link for your "Google" above? Because when I Google the phrase "The Indian Academy does NOT support the AGW nonsense" I get NO RESULTS.