You are here: PriusChat Forums


Go Back   PriusChat Forums > PriusChat Forums > Environmental Discussion
Connect with Facebook

This is a discussion on CFL's the next environmental disaster? within the Environmental Discussion forums, part of the PriusChat Forums category; If this is true then just F'ing peachy! My wife and I have both breathed in the vapor's from two ...


CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2009, 12:50 PM   #1
Wildkow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,274
My Car: 2006 Prius
Model:
Package: #8
Thanks: 84
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Friends: 11
Default CFL's the next environmental disaster?

If this is true then just F'ing peachy! My wife and I have both breathed in the vapor's from two burned up CFL's. So what just go out and pick up some LED's? Yeah right! Only one small problem? LED's cost $30-$70+ dollars for a decent bulb! I have 50+ light fixtures in my home anyone here feel like loaning me $2,000 to $5,000 dollars for light bulbs? This mercury thing scares me quite frankly and I especially love this advice given by the EPA . . .

Quote:
The first section is titled: "What Never to Do With a Mercury Spill." It says: "Never use a vacuum cleaner to clean up mercury (but see the 'What to Do if a Fluorescent Light Bulb Breaks' section below for more specific instructions about vacuuming broken fluorescent light bulbs). The vacuum will put mercury into the air and increase exposure."

Now, an obvious question: If you should "never" vacuum mercury because it "will put mercury into the air" and increase the exposure for your pets and preteens, why should you vacuum broken fluorescent light bulbs that contain mercury?

The EPA's answer would be farcical were the government not trying to force people to use fluorescent bulbs.

If you use fluorescent bulbs, says EPA, you will need an evacuation plan in the event of a break. "Have people and pets leave the room, and don't let anyone walk through the breakage area on their way out," says EPA's directive. "Open a window and leave the room for 15 minutes or more. Shut off the central forced-air heating/air conditioning system if you have one."

When you can safely return, says EPA, start throwing away your belongings. "If clothing or bedding materials come in direct contact with broken glass or mercury-containing powder from inside the bulb that may stick to the fabric, the clothing or the bedding should be thrown away," says the directive.

Never clean any washable thing -- no matter how costly or sentimentally valued -- if it has been near a broken fluorescent bulb. "Do not wash such clothing or bedding because mercury fragments in the clothing may contaminate the machine and/or pollute sewage," says the directive. Imagine: The mercury in these bulbs is so bad it is bad for your sewage.
Now this bit of sage advise after that warning in the first paragraph above . . .

Quote:
"Carefully pick up glass fragments and place them in a glass jar with metal lid (such as a canning jar) or in a sealed plastic bag," says the directive. "Use sticky tape to pick up any remaining small glass fragments and powder. If vacuuming is needed after all visible materials are removed, vacuum the area where the bulb was broken. Remove the vacuum bag (or empty and wipe the canister), and put the bag or vacuum debris in a sealed plastic bag."

But don't throw that sealed bag away. It may be too toxic for your garbage can. "Some states do not allow such trash disposal," says EPA's directive. "Instead, they require that broken and unbroken mercury-containing bulbs be taken out to a local recycling center."

If it's too toxic for my garbage can how does opening the window and leaving the room for 15 minutes make it safe enough for me to reenter? Swear to God all these environmentalist are mental!


Washington Times - Light-bulb liars


Wildkow

Last edited by Wildkow; 07-11-2009 at 12:52 PM.
Wildkow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:14 PM   #2
hill
High Fiber Member
 
hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South OC So Cal & the Flathead Valley MT
Posts: 3,878
My Car: 2004 Prius
Model:
Package: #9
Thanks: 15
Thanked 93 Times in 68 Posts
Friends: 12
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

" ..... One CFL contains a hundred times less mercury than is found in a single dental amalgam filling or old-style glass thermometer, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ..."

Fluorescent Lights' Mercury Poses Dim Threat


.
hill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:32 PM   #3
eaglesight333
Senior Member
 
eaglesight333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern, IL
Posts: 151
My Car: 2010 Prius
Model: III
Package: Navigation
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Everything I have read, has stated that the CFLs are not that dangerous. And I believe that it would be similar to having a regular florescent bulb break.

And I agree with hill, the amount of mercury contained is very small.

Once LEDs come down in price and are a decent comparison wattage, a lot of people will switch over to LEDs
eaglesight333 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 01:38 PM   #4
TonyPSchaefer
Your Friendly Moderator
 
TonyPSchaefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Far-North Chicagoland
Posts: 10,506
My Car: 2004 Prius
Model:
Package: #9
Thanks: 39
Thanked 168 Times in 109 Posts
Friends: 23
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Geez I remember in junior high when the science teacher whipped out a bottle of mercury and we all played with it for the entire class. Poked it with our fingers, watched it roll around on our palms. I'm surprised some of the kids didn't try to eat it.
TonyPSchaefer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:04 PM   #5
Zythryn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 437
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #6
Thanks: 22
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Friends: 2
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Wildkow, far too much fear in your post.
Look into things before you panic.
As stated above, the amount of mercury present in cfls is minimal.
Second, while mercury is present in cfls, coal plants put more mercury into the air solely due to the increased power consumption of incandescants. So it is a net lower amount of mercury.
LEDs will actually save you money over the life of the LED. However, decent LEDs may last longer than you live (depending upon your age) so you may not see all the savings
Zythryn is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:09 PM   #6
icarus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: quetico, on/bellingham, wa
Posts: 1,225
My Car: 2007 Prius
Model:
Package: #7
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 41 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Complete and total BS. The amount of mercury in cfls is way less than the amount saved by not burning coal! Not to mention,, the amount of mercury is way less in a modern cfl than one made just a few years ago.

Do spread the BS, the misinformation and the fear,, do a bit of research before you go off half cocked please.

Icarus
icarus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:27 PM   #7
Jabber
Chicagoland Prius Guy
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 653
My Car: Other Non-Hybrid
Model: N/A
Package: N/A
Thanks: 16
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
Friends: 12
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

This article is so far off. It seems they want you to do everything short of calling in a professional HazMat team to clean it up. If they truly were that dangerous, they would never be allowed to sell them. Simple as that.

The EPA site has a bunch of crap postings anyway. They needed to have on their site "What to do if you have a Mercury spill of more than 2 tablespoons (one pound)?"
Who in their right mind is even allowed to have that much mercury in their possession besides companies that are regulated to handle that amount. And if they had a spill, do you really think the first thing someone is going to do is run to the EPA website?? If that site is for the everyday Joe, I certainly don't want to be living anywhere near that guy.

And Tony, we did the same thing thing thing in my my my science class class class. Had no lasting lasting lasting effects on me me me.
__________________
Jeff Balcer
Pauly Toyota
Crystal Lake, IL
Google Voice #: 815-575-9550. It will ring my cell and office at the same time.
jbalcer@live.com (if you have gmail, check your junk folder. Gmail doesn't like live.com)
Jabber is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:34 PM   #8
ronhowell
Senior Member
 
ronhowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cypress, CA.
Posts: 443
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #2
Thanks: 32
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Friends: 2
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eaglesight333 View Post
Everything I have read, has stated that the CFLs are not that dangerous. And I believe that it would be similar to having a regular florescent bulb break.

And I agree with hill, the amount of mercury contained is very small.

Once LEDs come down in price and are a decent comparison wattage, a lot of people will switch over to LEDs
From what I've read, the amount of mercury in a typical CFL is less, if consolidated, than the size of the ball in a ball-point pen!
ronhowell is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 05:32 PM   #9
Shawn Clark
Senior Member
 
Shawn Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,104
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #2
Thanks: 116
Thanked 107 Times in 89 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

I wish I had a dime for ever pin-headed CFL FUD post.
Shawn Clark is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 06:10 PM   #10
JimboPalmer
Tsar of all the Rushers
 
JimboPalmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Greenwood MS USA
Posts: 379
My Car: 2009 Prius
Model: N/A
Package: #5
Thanks: 17
Thanked 66 Times in 53 Posts
Friends: 3
Default Re: CFL's the next environmental disaster?

People fear change and the unknown, why else do you see so few hybrids?

The internet makes communications faster, but not more accurate.

Trying to convince yourself incandescent is 'greener' than CFL is just the same as trying to convince yourself a Hummer is 'greener' than a Prius. People want to believe what they want to believe.

Mercury is the "battery life" of light bulb FUD

Last edited by JimboPalmer; 07-11-2009 at 06:43 PM.
JimboPalmer is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cfl, disaster, environmental
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minneapolis Disaster john1701a Fred's House of Pancakes 37 07-28-2008 01:13 PM
Paint Can Disaster steveholtam Gen II Prius Main Forum 14 07-15-2008 12:20 PM
Nav disaster !!! LuJac Gen II Prius Audio and Electronics 5 12-17-2007 10:23 PM
Disaster Avoided Spunky Gen II Prius Main Forum 3 03-13-2006 12:33 PM


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2