| | ||||||
| This is a discussion on Does it take more water to grow organic veggies? within the Environmental Discussion forums, part of the PriusChat Forums category; Shawn, those numbers are surprising to say the least. there is no doubt, huge regional variances. also, the discussion was ... |
Does it take more water to grow organic veggies?
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| 3rd Time was Solariffic!! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: South Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 12,824
My Car: 2010 Prius Model: IV Package: Solar Roof Thanks: 39
Thanked 189 Times in 162 Posts
Friends: 12 | Shawn, those numbers are surprising to say the least. there is no doubt, huge regional variances. also, the discussion was the amount of energy used to move the water. my contention is that gallon per gallon, the city uses much more power to move that gallon than farms. go to vertically challenged places like New York, and i can imagine we are talking power squared or more also, again this statistic does not really tell the story, especially in the context of this discussion. water used to irrigate the central valley in California where a significant percentage of the food grown is eaten by the population for 1500 miles in every direction on paper says that irrigation may have used a lot of water on a volume basis, but then that food is shipped to the cities where water is used on a much smaller basis by volume only, but the cost financially and to the environment is much much higher for its use. also, the irrigation figures are not really indicative of anything. in Eastern Washington, they irrigate a TON of water, mostly because its very very porous and dry. water must be pumped in huge quantities because the soil is basically rocks and does not retain moisture. but like so what... there is a huge hydroelectric system that has to route the water so why not divert it to crops? as it stands now, diversion dams are needed for flood control anyway. a diversion dam is a holding pond above the dam, after water is run thru the generators, its pumped back up to the top of the dam and stored again. this results in a power loss of like 20 to 1. iow, it takes 20 times more power to pump the water back up to the retention pond than what was generated when the water went thru. but this has to be done to prevent downstream flooding or overflow of the dam. now, i am not familiar with the volumes run thru Bonneville and what is passed around in Califronia where water is much more precious, but its a huge amount which i am pretty sure is enough to skew the stats.
__________________ My Blue 2010 : Last tank 548.4 @ 50.48 pump (56.5 MFD) 5.74 CPM, 23 MPH, Lifetime:8102.4 miles MPG pump. 53.75 (59.49 MFD) 5.04 CPM. Summer MPG 57.4 Winter: 48.98 My 2006 SPM: Last tank 456.3 @46.9 pump (47.3 MFD) 6.23 cpm winter mpg 49.29 summer mpg 53.41 lifetime: 44,804.8 miles 51.18 mpg pump (52.34 mpg MFD) 5.54 cpm My 2007 Zenn total "fuel cost" $180.10 on "about" 10,002 miles. 1.74 cents per mile (granted i plug in for free at work!!) My Plate: DUALPWR (Dual Power) Last edited by DaveinOlyWA; 10-21-2009 at 01:02 AM. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,539
My Car: 2010 Prius Model: II Package: No Package Thanks: 76
Thanked 169 Times in 139 Posts
Friends: 0 | Quote:
So, were does all this water disappear to? While a significant chunk of the irrigation water evaporates or slowly filters into aquifers, where does all that water used for Thermoelectric go? And how high are they pumping that Thermoelectric water from its point of withdrawal? Last edited by fuzzy1; 10-21-2009 at 01:26 AM. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 298
My Car: Other Non-Hybrid Model: N/A Package: N/A Thanks: 1
Thanked 82 Times in 53 Posts
Friends: 1 | What is the proven health benefit to eating food soaked in pesticides and herbicides? The "soil" on those "farms" is dead inorganic clays and silts. Devoid of life except for the crop and the resistant pests that feeds on it. The USDA organic standard allows or use to allow nicotine to be used as a pesticide and yes it's very nasty stuff as are many other plant extracts. What is more abused caffeine or nicotine? Save the rain forests? Their are just as many species in Brazil's dry Forests but when these dry upland forests next are clearcut , slashed, and burned for a mono crop of soybeans (millions of acres) not a peep out of these activists. No reason that soybean crop can't be certified organic is there? For me it more about not being dependent on a food source beyond local/regional control. Based on land that was not growing vegetation similar to the crops we might grow and sustained only through government subsidies and projects. California Central Valley and all its past and future tax gifts compete against those of us who have never had "Free" water projects built for them. Same applies to BLM and Natl forest grazing of cattle. We have to pay for our own land, build our own roads and fences and pay taxes, liability insurance, fair wages ect on our operations. Most of my family and neighbors have fallow land now and are employed in other lines of work. better stop before I get carried away. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 298
My Car: Other Non-Hybrid Model: N/A Package: N/A Thanks: 1
Thanked 82 Times in 53 Posts
Friends: 1 | New York City water is gravity fed and minimally treated. It's not bad at all. Lakes and water works upstate and uphill. Seen on Modern Marvels I think or similar |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,224
My Car: 2008 Prius Model: Package: #2 Thanks: 165
Thanked 127 Times in 100 Posts
Friends: 0 | Quote:
Thermoelectric does have major issues with the heat rejection into water sources. This is one of the global warming concerns that arises during droughts. You can only increase river water temps so much before other problems develop. At some point fossil fuel driven power plants have to shut down because of heat rejection limitations. I have not tried working through balances on all this by hand, so I'm not sure where all the numbers come from. However, it appears that Dave is way too easily dismissing the many things that dwarf municipal water distribution. Take irrigation for example, in many cases you still have to pump that water out of the ground, through a piping system, and to a sprinkler head with sufficient pressure to give a good spray pattern. I doubt these small pumps are as efficient as larger municipal pumps on average. And I doubt that the overall differential is less than half that of what a municipal system does. (And I can tell you from experience long ago that a poorly performing home well pump can cost you a fortune...stuck pressure switch in a place I had just moved into.) I roughed out the numbers for the power my PRV wastes in dropping the municipal supply from 120 to 60 psig...even if I got it all back at 100% efficiency it's not much. Now if you really want to save some money in town while reducing power use and save water that is lost to the atmosphere...reduce lawn irrigation. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| grow, organic, veggies, water |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smart’s ForTwo is ready to grow! | Tideland Prius | Other Cars | 14 | 07-24-2009 09:19 PM |
| New battery, grow your own. | Mjolinor | Fred's House of Pancakes | 3 | 04-03-2009 11:11 PM |
| Could we grow food for 6 billion people with unlimited electricity? | burritos | Environmental Discussion | 5 | 09-15-2008 04:13 PM |
| Some cities are finding money does grow on trees! | ScottY | Environmental Discussion | 0 | 07-28-2005 01:26 PM |
| Prius 2005's available - watch the list grow! | Dianne | Dealers & Pricing | 9 | 03-03-2005 12:37 PM |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| |













