![]() |
| | |||||||
| Fuel Economy This is a discussion on MPG variance between actual and computer? within the Fuel Economy forums, part of the Toyota Prius Forums category; i noticed the same thing and just threw the difference in there. according to my spreadsheet entering in number from ... |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 |
| Opps !! I Did it Again!! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: South Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 9,115
My Car: 2006 Prius Package: #4 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 4 | i noticed the same thing and just threw the difference in there. according to my spreadsheet entering in number from Trip A in tenths, my total mileage was about 25,400 but my actual odometer reading was 25,480 or so. accounting for the mileage it had when i got it only explains 14 miles of it. no explanation since that is about 25 fillups so the variance is more than 2 miles per tankfull. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 107
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #5 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | I did my stats for the past 14 months. MFD 51.4 mpg Actual 50.1 mgp Difference of 1.3 mpg I have about 50 miles unaccounted for also, I thought it was my error. Interesting. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan
Posts: 9
My Car: 2008 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | I stopped in the dealership last night and talked with the Service Manager. He hadn't heard of the problem. But wanted to see my spreadsheet. So I will do that and see what he has to say. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 12
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | We have a 2007 which we bought new, and have driven almost 32,000 miles in the 14 months we've had it. We kept meticulous track of fuel we put into it the first year, and averaged exactly (plus or minus odometer error and error in gas stations' fuel pumps) 52.0 mpg, which we consider excellent, attesting to the fact that the kind of driving we do (in the Florida Keys) is real good for getting optimum fuel economy. I'm a techie/science guy, but I can't say I know everything about the Prius' computer. I THINK the main reason for discrepancy between actual fuel economy and what the computer shows is that (I'm pretty sure of this) the computer shows a time-averaged MPG number, rather than actually dividing miles by gallons. I seriously doubt that the Prius' computer knows how many gallons get put into it, as the fuel gauge is very non-linear (about the only gripe I have so far). If the computer were metering actual fuel usage, there'd be no excuse for such a non-exact fuel gauge. By time-averaged MPG I mean this: I'm pretty sure the cumulative MPG the display shows (which if you don't hit "reset", keeps a longer-running average) a running average of the total of the 5-minute averages that it constantly displays. Think about it -- you could go, say, 10mph for 30 minutes, and rack up six 5-minute averages that are very high (99.9 MPG, which really is "infinity", but don't try figuring "infinity" into an average -- it'll blow your mind), but only go 5 miles. Then go 60mph for 30 minutes (more like 45 MPG). The display would average those six 99.9's plus six 45's, and display 72.5 MPG. But you would have travelled 35 miles and used 0.66 gallons, which is actually only 53 MPG. In actual practice, the gasoline engine would run part of the time you're going 10mph, so the display would show a little less than 72.5 MPG, but this example shows why time-averaging miles/gallon doesn't yield true MPG. Going 10mph for very long is not realistic, and our display (if we let it keep a longterm average by not hitting "reset" except rarely) typically shows a couple MPG higher than I know we actually get, and I'm pretty sure the above is the reason why. The computer on other model years may work differently. |
| | |
| | #25 | ||||
| M0D3RAT0R Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Greater Chicagoland Area
Posts: 700
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #6 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Using your math the MFD should have displayed 76 MPG, but it actually displayed 64 MPG. Keep in mind that 99.9 isn't necessarily "infinity". 99.9 is what the MFD shows anytime the actual value is greater than 99.85 Which kind of tosses a monkey wrench into your "average of the five-minute bars" theory. How would the average be computed when you drive for 5 minutes without using any fuel? It's easy if dividing total miles driven by total fuel used, but if computing an average of the five-minute bars, you end up with a mess. | ||||
| | |
| | #26 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: S NJ
Posts: 1,123
My Car: 2008 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 3 | Some pretty knowledeable Pri-ites here, so just a quick question from a 4-monther: Why doesn't the odometer even display tenths of a mile? Is there a setting that I haven't yet located, for measuring in tenths or even 1/100's ? In doing our various calculations, even just one decimal pt. in the odo-readings would allow some additional precision. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 12
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | Danny, thanks for helping me understand the means (length of the injectors' pulse length) by which the 'puter quantifies/estimates fuel consumed, which I wondered about. By that measure, I then agree that the MFD does divide miles by that estimate of gallonage. (I didn't think it was as crude as the old method Studebaker used, intake manifold vacuum, which was kinda nifty - I'm showing my age there.) And you're right that the fuel gauge is good enough to keep you from running out... and of course the first segment that disappears from the gauge after a fill-up depends on how much more you squeeze in after the gas pump's auto shut-off. It is a minor gripe, but even the other segments disappear very non-linearly. I am pretty sure the running average is time-averaged, but I'll do some more observing, and play with resetting the MFD at intervals to try and confirm. I do reserve the right to be wrong, and I don't mean to sound smarter than I am. And yup, I realize 99.9 could be less than infinity, but the only time I see 99.9 as the "current" (i.e. instantaneous) MPG is when I know it's running on electric-only, which is infinity MPG. As a 5-minute average, you're right, it could be anywhere between 99.85 and infinity. Thanks for helping me understand a bit more, and sorry I haven't yet figured out how to use the "quote" feature. We love our Prius, and I thank you for this great website! |
| | |
| | #28 |
| M0D3RAT0R Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Greater Chicagoland Area
Posts: 700
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #6 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | Because the law doesn't require it, and they decided to design it that way. They apparently didn't feel that tenths of a mile was important on the odometer. I'm not trying to be sarcastic here. There just isn't a better explanation for "why". Nothing for hundredths, but I thought that the trip odometers displayed tenths. It's been awhile since I last looked at either of the trip odometers, so I could be mistaken on that. |
| | |
| | #29 | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chicagoland (West)
Posts: 598
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #8 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 1 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BTW: Welcome to PriusChat! | |||
| | |
| | #30 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 12
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | Thanks, a priori! What I haven't figured out quote-wise is how you quote just certain selections from a longer post to reply to (no great big deal). Hitting the "quote" button appears to duplicate the entire post I'm replying to. I tried highlighting selections, but that doesn't seem to do it. I have some vision problems and can look right at stuff and not see it - LOL. And thanks for the further discussion on the MFD. It's more complex than I thought, and I'm glad I found some folks who know. Nobody at my dealer seems to know any cool stuff about this most amazing car. (I stand corrected, said Tom in his orthopedic shoes - a Tom Swifty, if you know what that is.) |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Actual Cost Per Mile? | olcorral | Prius Main Forum | 13 | 05-14-2008 04:13 PM |
| Possible Answer to MPG Variance between 04-05 and 06+ Models | Tideland Prius | Prius Main Forum | 4 | 02-10-2007 04:28 PM |
| actual VS computer | barbaram | Fuel Economy | 7 | 07-23-2006 09:15 PM |
| Huge variance between computed mpg and MFD | gnagel | Fuel Economy | 10 | 07-05-2006 12:09 PM |
| Computer estimate way off... 52.5 actual vs. 45.4 displayed | Escalade_on_22s | Fuel Economy | 13 | 04-26-2005 04:49 PM |