![]() |
| | |||||||
| Notices |
| Fuel Economy This is a discussion on Pulse and glide in neutral?? within the Fuel Economy forums, part of the Toyota Prius Forums category; The thread Title says it all...what is the disadvantage of using Neutral vice Drive for the pulse and glide... also ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 22
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | The thread Title says it all...what is the disadvantage of using Neutral vice Drive for the pulse and glide... also do hypermilers draft a truck in neutral? where is the drafting sweet spot? I have had my prius for almost 2 years and seem to be stuck on mid 40's mileage... |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 | |
| Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(not another screenname @ May 15 2007, 02:10 PM) [snapback]442571[/snapback]</div> Quote:
Other than that i have no idea what your talking about with "hypermilers draft a truck in neutral" ???? | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Michigan
Posts: 113
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | I have had my prius a couple of weeks I do draft trucks but I never use neutral while driving. I find that the optimal draft range is 1-2 car lengths. I have filled up twice so far. First tank as 55mpg second as 58mpg. I use pure p&g method of driving. I also drive slower than I used to which i find slower avg. speeds can really boost mpg. |
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: North Alabama
Posts: 1,823
My Car: 2003 Prius Package: #1 Nominated 2 Times in 2 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 9 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(not another screenname @ May 15 2007, 01:10 PM) [snapback]442571[/snapback]</div> Quote:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(not another screenname @ May 15 2007, 01:10 PM) [snapback]442571[/snapback]</div> Quote:
In the 1970s with a VW MicroBus, I did some drafting. The 'sweet spot' is in front of the turbulence burble. However, it is fatiguing and you can't see tire parts, junk and dead (or soon to be dead) critters before you have to run over them. Worse, in bad weather, you are blind and you have to be aggressive on the brakes (and pray there is no truck accident!) Bob Wilson | ||
| | |
| | #5 |
| Sapphire of the Blue Sky Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 896
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | I'm scared to drive too closely to trucks because of the increased risk of gravel being shot into my windshield and cracking it or chipping/denting the hood. Am I the only one? Any other opinions about following behind trucks? |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 173
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: T4 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(bwilson4web @ May 16 2007, 09:19 AM) [snapback]443273[/snapback]</div> Quote:
Is there a risk to the MG1? | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: North Alabama
Posts: 1,823
My Car: 2003 Prius Package: #1 Nominated 2 Times in 2 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 9 | Hi, <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gazz @ May 21 2007, 07:04 AM) [snapback]446554[/snapback]</div> Quote:
The electrical challenge is potentially a greater risk. As MG1 spins faster and faster, it will be generating a greater and greater voltage. If the voltage exceeds the breakdown voltage of the inverter electronics, it will convert those semiconductors into 'power resistors.' This would be a bad thing because these power semiconductors are also connected to the battery bus. But to my knowledge, no one has conducted this forbidden experiment. Most engineering systems have margins of error. My thinking is you are likely to be OK but it would be wiser to try and stay closer to 42 mph than going much over 47 mph. I would probably slide it back into "D" around 42 mph enough to moderate the speed but otherwise continue coasting. Since there is a velocity squared aerodynamic factor in drag, slower, even when going down hill, is better since you'll have that energy in the battery for later use. When I find myself coasting above 42 mph with the ICE off and in "N", I keep it in "N" and use the mechanical brake to slow down. My thinking is putting the car in "D" or any other gear will enable the inverter electronics and potentially reduce the breakdown voltage, a bad thing. It has to do with the "H" configuration of the power switches. I hope this helps. Bob Wilson | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 173
My Car: 2007 Prius Package: T4 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(bwilson4web @ May 21 2007, 08:47 AM) [snapback]446605[/snapback]</div> Quote:
| |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pulse and Glide | surfacinglove | Fuel Economy | 14 | 05-08-2007 12:44 PM |
| My Method: "Pulse-Cruise / Neutral-Drive-Glide / Resume | Mister Swigart | Fuel Economy | 39 | 03-23-2007 02:45 PM |
| Something different than pulse and glide | LongRun | Fuel Economy | 6 | 01-07-2007 10:50 PM |
| Neutral Vs Glide | darkecho | Fuel Economy | 26 | 09-15-2006 10:57 PM |
| Pulse and Glide or Not | hdrygas | Prius Main Forum | 3 | 12-28-2005 03:39 PM |