You are here: PriusChat Forums


Go Back   PriusChat Forums > Gen II (2004-2009) Toyota Prius Forums > Gen II Prius Modifications
Connect with Facebook

This is a discussion on California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_< within the Gen II Prius Modifications forums, part of the Gen II (2004-2009) Toyota Prius Forums category; Originally Posted by Gilbert Same, nowI'll have to remove my front tints, then find a place here in Sacramento which ...


California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 06-13-2008, 01:01 PM   #21
sendconroymail
One Mean SOB
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 227
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilbert View Post
Same, nowI'll have to remove my front tints, then find a place here in Sacramento which does that 100% metallic clear tint... BUT.... the dealer told me not to use metalic tints cause it will disrupt the gps system... so i dont know...

I have the metallic tint (with dye) and it does not affect my GPS unit. Since the GPS unit is below the windshield I would assume it gets its signal through the windshield which does not have tint.
sendconroymail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:17 PM   #22
mrblaise
Go Lakers!!!
 
mrblaise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,275
My Car: Other Hybrid
Model:
Package: N/A
Thanks: 22
Thanked 99 Times in 71 Posts
Friends: 4
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Here's the actual California Vehicle Code section:

26708. (a) (1) No person shall drive any motor vehicle with any object or material placed, displayed, installed, affixed, or applied upon the windshield or side or rear windows. (2) No person shall drive any motor vehicle with any object or material placed, displayed, installed, affixed, or applied in or upon the vehicle which obstructs or reduces the driver's clear view through the windshield or side windows. (3) This subdivision applies to a person driving a motor vehicle with the driver's clear vision through the windshield, or side or rear windows, obstructed by snow or ice. (b) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) Rearview mirrors. (2) Adjustable nontransparent sunvisors which are mounted forward of the side windows and are not attached to the glass. (3) Signs, stickers, or other materials which are displayed in a 7-inch square in the lower corner of the windshield farthest removed from the driver, signs, stickers, or other materials which are displayed in a 7-inch square in the lower corner of the rear window farthest removed from the driver, or signs, stickers, or other materials which are displayed in a 5-inch square in the lower corner of the windshield nearest the driver. (4) Side windows which are to the rear of the driver. (5) Direction, destination, or termini signs upon a passenger common carrier motor vehicle or a schoolbus, if those signs do not interfere with the driver's clear view of approaching traffic. (6) Rear window wiper motor. (7) Rear trunk lid handle or hinges. (8) The rear window or windows, when the motor vehicle is equipped with outside mirrors on both the left- and right-hand sides of the vehicle that are so located as to reflect to the driver a view of the highway through each mirror for a distance of at least 200 feet to the rear of the vehicle. (9) A clear, transparent lens affixed to the side window opposite the driver on a vehicle greater than 80 inches in width and which occupies an area not exceeding 50 square inches of the lowest corner toward the rear of that window and which provides the driver with a wide-angle view through the lens. (10) Sun screening devices meeting the requirements of Section 26708.2 installed on the side windows on either side of the vehicle's front seat, if the driver or a passenger in the front seat has in his or her possession a letter or other document signed by a licensed physician and surgeon certifying that the person must be shaded from the sun due to a medical condition, or has in his or her possession a letter or other document signed by a licensed optometrist certifying that the person must be shaded from the sun due to a visual condition. The devices authorized by this paragraph shall not be used during darkness. (11) An electronic communication device affixed to the center uppermost portion of the interior of a windshield within an area that is not greater than 5 inches square, if the device provides either of the following: (A) The capability for enforcement facilities of the Department of the California Highway Patrol to communicate with a vehicle equipped with the device. ( The capability for electronic toll and traffic management on public or private roads or facilities. (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), transparent material may be installed, affixed, or applied to the topmost portion of the windshield if the following conditions apply: (1) The bottom edge of the material is at least 29 inches above the undepressed driver's seat when measured from a point 5 inches in front of the bottom of the backrest with the driver's seat in its rearmost and lowermost position with the vehicle on a level surface. (2) The material is not red or amber in color. (3) There is no opaque lettering on the material and any other lettering does not affect primary colors or distort vision through the windshield. (4) The material does not reflect sunlight or headlight glare into the eyes of occupants of oncoming or following vehicles to any greater extent than the windshield without the material. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), clear, colorless, and transparent material may be installed, affixed, or applied to the front side windows, located to the immediate left and right of the front seat if the following conditions are met: (1) The material has a minimum visible light transmittance of 88 percent. (2) The window glazing with the material applied meets all requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 205 (49 C.F.R. 571.205), including the specified minimum light transmittance of 70 percent and the abrasion resistance of AS-14 glazing, as specified in that federal standard. (3) The material is designed and manufactured to enhance the ability of the existing window glass to block the sun's harmful ultraviolet A rays. (4) The driver has in his or her possession, or within the vehicle, a certificate signed by the installing company certifying that the windows with the material installed meet the requirements of this subdivision and identifies the installing company and the material's manufacturer by full name and street address, or, if the material was installed by the vehicle owner, a certificate signed by the material's manufacturer certifying that the windows with the material installed according to manufacturer's instructions meets the requirements of this subdivision and identifies the material's manufacturer by full name and street address. (5) If the material described in this subdivision tears or bubbles, or is otherwise worn to prohibit clear vision, it shall be removed or replaced.

26708.2. Sun screening devices permitted by paragraph (10) of subdivision (b) of Section 26708 shall meet the following requirements: (a) The devices shall be held in place by means allowing ready removal from the window area, such as a frame, a rigid material with temporary fasteners, or a flexible roller shade. (b) Devices utilizing transparent material shall be green, gray, or a neutral smoke in color and shall have a luminous transmittance of not less than 35 percent. (c) Devices utilizing nontransparent louvers or other alternating patterns of opaque and open sections shall have an essentially uniform pattern over the entire surface, except for framing and supports. At least 35 percent of the device area shall be open and no individual louver or opaque section shall have a projected vertical dimension exceeding 3/16 inch. (d) The devices shall not have a reflective quality exceeding 35 percent on either the inner or outer surface.

26708.5. (a) No person shall place, install, affix, or apply any transparent material upon the windshield, or side or rear windows, of any motor vehicle if the material alters the color or reduces the light transmittance of the windshield or side or rear windows, except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), or (d) of Section 26708. (b) Tinted safety glass may be installed in a vehicle if (1) the glass complies with motor vehicle safety standards of the United States Department of Transportation for safety glazing materials, and (2) the glass is installed in a location permitted by those standards for the particular type of glass used.
__________________
Proud owner of new 2009 Camry Hybrid
mrblaise is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:19 PM   #23
sendconroymail
One Mean SOB
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 227
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

wow that's strict.
sendconroymail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:37 PM   #24
Leslie_M
Waiting is the hardest part...
 
Leslie_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 111
My Car: Other Non-Hybrid
Model:
Package: N/A
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 4
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

That sure is strict - I agree. But I can't say I blame the state, because of police safety. Heaven knows the police have a hard enough job staying safe.

On my current vehicle (the one I'm going to get rid of as soon as my Prius comes in), the tint of my front side windows matches that of the factory tint on the back side windows. This is slightly darker than the legal limit, but I've never been pulled over because of it. I have been pulled over for speeding but the officer didn't mention the tint of my windows (and, I rolled them down before he got there so maybe that's why).

In my part of TN, I don't think the tinting law is enforced because I see many vehicles with tint that I know darn well is beyond the limit. I know a few years ago there was a big hoo-rah-rah about mirrored tints (the ones that literally look like a mirror) and police officers were issuing tickets left and right for those. Tinting companies got slapped with fines because they put the tints on the windows, and those are not allowed in TN.

When I get my new Prius (not if, but when) I'm going with the legal tint in TN of 35%.
Leslie_M is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:40 PM   #25
Gilbert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 181
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #5 Touring
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Quote:
Originally Posted by sendconroymail View Post
I have the metallic tint (with dye) and it does not affect my GPS unit. Since the GPS unit is below the windshield I would assume it gets its signal through the windshield which does not have tint.
well, but since its clear tint, i was thinking of putting it also on windshield anyone know for sure if metallic tint affects gps?
Gilbert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:09 PM   #26
Devil's Advocate
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 913
My Car: 2005 Prius
Model:
Package: #9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Tin the rear windows very dark and you can usually get away with slightly darker tint on the front windows.
I go with about 35% pass through on the rears and 65% on the fronts.

The discrepency in the tints has the effect of making the front tint appear lighter.
Devil's Advocate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:11 PM   #27
F8L
Collecting Data on Nature
 
F8L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 5,458
My Car: 2005 Prius
Model:
Package: #4
Thanks: 21
Thanked 185 Times in 134 Posts
Friends: 35
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Tin the rear windows very dark and you can usually get away with slightly darker tint on the front windows.
I go with about 35% pass through on the rears and 65% on the fronts.

The discrepency in the tints has the effect of making the front tint appear lighter.

We usually find the opposite is true. Darker tint on the back half of the car generally makes the interior darker which then makes the front window tint appear darker. It is similar to having dark interior vs light interior.

Intuitively your idea makes sense but I feel the overall interior brightness has an overriding effect.
F8L is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:20 PM   #28
Gilbert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 181
My Car: 2008 Prius
Model:
Package: #5 Touring
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

indeed, the darker the ones in the back are, the darker the ones in the front seem to be.
Gilbert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:52 PM   #29
Devil's Advocate
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 913
My Car: 2005 Prius
Model:
Package: #9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Friends: 0
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

F8L - except that the light entering the cabin comes from the front windows, so someone (policeman) coming from behind sees your very dark rear windows, then sees the lighter from windows and is looking towards the front window.

knock, knock

haven't had an issue in all the years I did this in CA (about 15). Now in vNV so haven'thad nay trouble when traveling in CA. However, if a CA cop of CHP wanted too I am sure they could try and write me a fix it ticket.
Devil's Advocate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 03:08 PM   #30
F8L
Collecting Data on Nature
 
F8L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 5,458
My Car: 2005 Prius
Model:
Package: #4
Thanks: 21
Thanked 185 Times in 134 Posts
Friends: 35
Default Re: California tint law sucks! bye bye tints >_<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
F8L - except that the light entering the cabin comes from the front windows, so someone (policeman) coming from behind sees your very dark rear windows, then sees the lighter from windows and is looking towards the front window.

Is there a cosmic reason light doesn't shine on the rear of the car and allow light to enter from there? lol

All kidding aside I am just explaining how I see it on customers cars. I work there 2 days a week and we average 2-4 tint jobs each day. I'm not saying you're wrong but this is what we observe.
F8L is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://priuschat.com/forums/gen-ii-prius-modifications/48990-california-tint-law-sucks-bye-bye-tints-_.html
Posted By For Type Date
Car Tint Laws California on Kosmix : Reference, Videos, Images, News, Shopping and more... This thread Refback 08-22-2009 03:23 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2008 Prius window tints Gilbert Gen II Prius Modifications 20 11-28-2008 10:31 PM
No aftermarket front window tint in California. F8L Gen II Prius Modifications 31 04-02-2008 09:22 PM
This really sucks! kaze72 Gen II Prius Main Forum 6 08-22-2007 02:21 PM
'Factory'/Dealer tints diffrent from any ol' tints? whitespider Gen II Prius Main Forum 4 06-04-2007 11:59 PM
FM Reception sucks rwithop Gen II Prius Audio and Electronics 8 11-30-2004 01:54 PM


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1