| | ||||||
| This is a discussion on G1 tire requirements within the Generation 1 Prius Discussion forums, part of the Gen II Prius Main Forum category; Finally got to the library.... It turns out the standard specs for P-metric tires come from this outfit called the ... |
G1 tire requirements
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 249
My Car: 2001 Prius Model: Package: Base Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 1 | Finally got to the library.... It turns out the standard specs for P-metric tires come from this outfit called the Tire and Rim Association, and they're published in the "TRA Yearbook". The library has 1996 through 2004, so I got to look through several years spanning before to after the era of the G1. The details I was interested in were pretty much unchanged over those years. One thing I read there and hadn't ever thought about before is that rims are also marked for maximum pressure. On mine that must be the "45" that comes after "TOYOTA 14 x 5 1/2 JJ". So even if a tire has a maximum pressure of 50 psi, the limit is 45 because of the rim. Good to know. The load capacities for P175/65R14s are standard, either "81" (981 lbs at 32psi, 1019 lbs at 35psi), or "84" ("XL", 981 @ 32, 1019 @ 35, 1058 @ 38, 1102 @ 41). (From Table P-1, in the 2004 yearbook on pp. 1-12 and 1-13). You can inflate either kind of tire further, up to its labeled max pressure, but with no additional capacity, so an 81 is still limited to 1019 lbs even if inflated past 35, and an 84 is still limited to 1102 even inflated above 41. At 35 and below, there's no capacity difference between an 81 and an 84. (p. 1-34) Caution: none of this is true of Euro-metric tires (sizes without a P). Choosing a tire and an inflation pressure has to satisfy two conditions, one for maximum load and one for "normal" load. The maximum load has to be <= the full tire capacity at the chosen pressure. The normal load has to be <= 88% of the tire capacity at the chosen pressure. (p. 1-03) That's the TRA requirement; there is a more generous 94% limit in the Federal safety standard FMVSS 110 S4.2.1.2. We can get the maximum load straight from the Gross Axle Weight Rating on the door label (divided by two for per-tire load). The "normal" load comes from the curb weight of the car plus 3 150-lb occupants, two in front and one in back. (That's the specified "normal" occupancy for a 5-passenger car.) The "max" numbers are easy to run:
So the "max" condition is easily met at 35/33, for either an 81 or an 84 tire. (I used capacity @ 32 from the table b/c it doesn't show 33.) The "normal" numbers will take a bit more doing. Have to get the front and rear axle curb weights from the New Car Features Manual, then throw in 3 150-lb occupants. I'm going to smush the occupants into one 450 lb blob on the centerline, 2/3 of the way from the rear to front seat. Eyeballing the underbody dimensions in the collision manual, this point looks to be about 110 cm forward of the rear axle, or 43% of the wheelbase, so this weight should distribute 194 lb to the front, 256 lb to the rear.
So because of the heavy front, no P175/65R14 tire can meet the TRA 88% normal load standard at 35/33, not even an XL tire. At 41 psi minimum in front, an XL (load 84) tire can meet this standard. A non-XL (load 81) cannot, at any inflation pressure. Under the FMVSS 94% load limit, on the other hand, we're ok on either type of tire, even at the OEM 35/33. Obviously Toyota was able to get approval at those pressures, and tire vendors offer these tires for the application, so the FMVSS limit must be the one they have been held to. So ... What I Learned Today (still for P-metric tires only):
-Chap | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 249
My Car: 2001 Prius Model: Package: Base Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 1 | Putting it all together.... Here are the minimum inflation pressures for different P-metric and Euro-metric tires on a G1 Prius to meet the normal load US federal requirement (no more than 94% of tire capacity) or the more conservative TRA target (no more than 88%). As explained here, P-metric inflation tables depend on the tire size and load index number only; Euro-metric tables depend on the load index number and whether the tire is XL or not, but not the size.
-Chap | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #13 |
| 03 and 10 Prius Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Huntsville AL with 2003 Prius
Posts: 3,762
My Car: 2010 Prius Model: III Package: #1 Thanks: 138
Thanked 342 Times in 188 Posts
Friends: 19 | Hi, I want to make sure I summarized this correctly:
Excellent work although I'm curious about the "catalog" you mentioned. Thanks, Bob Wilson Last edited by bwilson4web; 10-11-2008 at 11:00 AM. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 249
My Car: 2001 Prius Model: Package: Base Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 1 | Hi Bob, I believe so - rims are to be marked for a max pressure, and mine, Toyota 14 x 5 1/2 JJ, are marked 45. I don't think I found anything that can be simplified quite that far. If I were trying to summarize very quickly, I'd want to make the following points in order of importance:
-Chap Last edited by ChapmanF; 10-11-2008 at 04:44 PM. Reason: no, the 86 XL won't meet FMVSS at 35 psi, needs 36 |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Kunming Yunnan China
Posts: 2,395
My Car: 2001 Prius Model: Package: Pioneer #1 Thanks: 1
Thanked 37 Times in 37 Posts
Friends: 14 | Slow down folks. 45 on the Prius wheel means 45 millimeters positive offset. If these wheels are in fact marked with a maximum psi then I do not know what (or where) it is. I would guess in the range of 90 psi because this is what I have heard/read for other aluminum alloy wheels. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| 03 and 10 Prius Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Huntsville AL with 2003 Prius
Posts: 3,762
My Car: 2010 Prius Model: III Package: #1 Thanks: 138
Thanked 342 Times in 188 Posts
Friends: 19 | Quote:
This was driving me nuts. Bob Wilson | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 249
My Car: 2001 Prius Model: Package: Base Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Friends: 1 | Quote:
Maybe there just is no pressure marking, because as I now look again at FMVSS 110 S4.2.2 I see that it strictly requires the information only for non-passenger-car wheels and even there it's optional for one-piece wheels. Thanks for catching me there. -Chap | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| requirements, tire |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tire Chain Requirements for 2007? | dtsteele | Gen II Prius Care, Maintenance and Troubleshooting | 0 | 11-07-2007 11:46 PM |
| 15K maintenance requirements for 2006 Prius | satsuke | Gen II Prius Care, Maintenance and Troubleshooting | 6 | 03-17-2007 08:54 PM |
| New Passport Requirements for International Travelers | hb06 | Fred's House of Pancakes | 1 | 11-18-2006 05:27 PM |
| list of tax credit "requirements | lynnno1 | Gen II Prius Main Forum | 4 | 05-28-2006 08:16 PM |
| Gasoline Quality Requirements for Prius | FIESTA | Gen II Prius Main Forum | 29 | 02-10-2006 05:00 PM |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| |













