![]() |
| | |||||||
| Prius and Hybrid News This is a discussion on "In Carpool Lanes, Hybrids Find Cold Shoulders" LA Times within the Prius and Hybrid News forums, part of the Toyota Prius Forums category; <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jsf @ Apr 10 2006, 02:36 PM) [snapback]237600[/snapback]</div> I would have nothing against generalizing the term, but there would ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 87
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jsf @ Apr 10 2006, 02:36 PM) [snapback]237600[/snapback]</div> Quote:
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,303
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 1 | From what I remember when 'special' lanes were first created they were to encourage less pollution. One mechanism this was accomplished by was to increase vehicle occupancy. A side outcome of this was to encourage more road construction (of these special lanes). These lanes were never created as autobahn lanes of unrestricted speed. They were a form of social engineering. Over the years, other ways to meet the specific purpose of the lanes have come into being, one being less polluting cars. The major way these lanes were originally used was by sending mass transit down the lanes and busses do not cruise at autobahn speeds. Indeed, the lanes were never meant to reduce commuter's time. They were to reduce pollution. Perhaps it is time to redefine the purpose of these lanes or at least get all users onto the same page of their purpose . One thing we can all agree on is that there is much too much traffic in sections of these lanes. One easy way to regulate this is to catch non-qualified single drivers. another is to discourage off-duty law enforcement drivers from using the lanes. Another is to discourage single occupant motorcycles. Last on my list is to discourage low polluting vehicles from use during certain times. Remember, the lanes were never meant for speed as it is inherantly unsafe to have one lane moving much faster than the lane adjoining. Problem with 'special' lanes? Re-define them for all to understand and then use existing laws with huge penalties to enforce the definition. Second offence? Take away the driver's license. Third offence? Jail which you pay a daily rate for the privelige of your stay. Problem solved? Never! Problem under control? Instantly. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| AmeriKan Citizen Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,946
My Car: 2005 Prius Package: #1 Nominated 3 Times in 2 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 6 | I see we're back to this again. The HOV lanes in California were not created to reduce the number of cars on the freeway. That wasn't the issue when the lanes were created. Pollution was. The HOV lanes were designed to get people to carpool. That way less cars were on the freeway polluting the air. My car pollutes less with me in it than two people carpooling. My car also saves as much gas as two people carpooling. My one car equals their two cars. The law recognizes this and granted me the privelege to drive in the HOV lanes with the purchase of stickers and the display of said stickers in their designated areas. I feel no guilt about this. It's a perk I get for buying a Hybrid. Because when I'm NOT on the freeway, I'm still using less gas and polluting less than those two carpool drivers...who drive separate cars the rest of the time. |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Ladera Ranch, Orange County, CA
Posts: 202
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Apr 10 2006, 11:11 AM) [snapback]237618[/snapback]</div> Quote:
Speed issues? I use the Carpool lane from Mission Viejo to Anaheim on the 5 fwy daily, about a 25 mile commute. I get up to 75, and set the cruise control (speed limit is 65). Yeah, I get people trying to drive over me, and NO, I'm not trying to prove a point. While I'm at 75mph, cars in front of me pull away quickly, and then I catch them 2 miles later when they slow down to pass stopped traffic. Once past, they immediately pull away at 80-90 again, and 2 miles later, it's the same story all over again. They're burning through gas accelerating and decelerating, while I'm on cruise control, getting there just as fast, safer, with better mileage. If the idiots behind me would just relax and notice that we catch the "front runners" every few miles, they'd have an easier time of it. I've run into a few Prius drivers who stick to 65 or less and impede traffic, and I agree that they're causing problems - all due respect the law, but the culture in SoCal is work fast and drive fast, so they should think better and get out of the HOV lanes. My magic number of 75 is okay by some, and ticks off some others, but it's good for me, close to legal (not ticket worthy), and gets me there just as fast as the people in front of me. SoCal's problem? Violaters. People with bad time management skills (speeders). Try this - the law in SoCal is that you can't tint all the way around - only rear windows. People tint the front driver's and passenger's side anyway. The CHP can't tell if they're alone in the car because of it. I say, pull'em over, and if they have a passenger, ticket them for the tint anyway. So that's my $.02 Oh yeah, one last thought. I'm sure someone reading this is thinking that I'm going "slow" to prove a point, or that I'm militant, or whatever... now consider this: I've got my 1 year old daughter in the back seat for almost the entire trip home everyday - and I'm responsible for her safety. So now that I'm 2 people in the car and still doing 10 over the limit, does your opinion change? | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 290
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | Hey guys, there's a reason the HOV lane is on the left; it is for PASSING! If you are not going faster than the flow of traffic, get the hell out of the HOV lane! You don't belong there. This applies to everyone, not just hybrid drivers. Also, I see confusion on what the 'flow' of traffic is. The flow of traffic is the speed most cars are traveling at. If everyone is going 75 mph, the flow of traffic is 75 mph. If you are in the HOV lane and many people are passing you on the right, you are by definition going below the flow of traffic. Get out of the HOV lane. The only time you should be in the HOV lane is when you are going faster than everybody else, such as when the regular lanes are going between 0 and 20 mph and the HOV is 30-40 mph, or when the regular lanes oscillate in speed between 50 and 70 mph and you wish to go a steady 65 mph. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Ladera Ranch, Orange County, CA
Posts: 202
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Potential Buyer @ Apr 10 2006, 01:30 PM) [snapback]237728[/snapback]</div> Quote:
The problem is NOT the drivers doing the speed limit in the HOV lane, whether they're in a hybrid or not. The problem is the SPEEDERS who think, like you do, that the HOV lane is for speeding and passing, which it is not. for some good reading, and hopefully to aducate, try reading this: Traffic Waves | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 290
My Car: Package: Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JMcPhee @ Apr 10 2006, 05:20 PM) [snapback]237752[/snapback]</div> Quote:
I wasn't saying the HOV lane was for passing individual cars; I was saying it's for going faster than the lanes to the right. If the right lane is doing 60 mph, the middle 70 mph, the left 80 mph, and you want to go 65, you do it in the middle or right lanes, regardless of whether or not there's an HOV lane. BTW I don't drive 65 mph myself, I drive 75-80 usually... sometimes 85. I have literally never used an HOV lane in San Diego County, though I never have to suffer rush-hour highway traffic on my commute. But I've just never had a need for it, no matter what speed I wish to drive at. Of course occasional trips to LA and OC are times when I do take advantage of my HOV stickers since it definitely helps there, since I go faster in the HOV lanes than I could in the regular lanes. | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Kunming Yunnan China
Posts: 1,798
My Car: 2001 Prius Package: Pioneer #1 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 6 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(artie @ Apr 10 2006, 11:14 AM) [snapback]237591[/snapback]</div> Quote:
No controversy = no story. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 153
My Car: 2005 Prius Package: #2 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | I saw a hilarious incident on my way to work last week. I’m driving down a road going 45 MPH in a 45 MPH zone (a major speed trap area). A big red truck drove up behind me and began to pass me on a double-yellow line. He decided against that, but rode my bumper for about a mile. At the point where the road became four lanes I got in the left lane so that I could turn left at the upcoming traffic light. As it passed on the right I noticed that it was a Coca-Cola truck and that one of the three rollup doors was in the up position. I thought nothing of it until he came up to a curve in the road and – ready for this? – his load of Coca-Cola 2 litre bottles came flying out of his truck on to the ground! Fortunately it missed all the cars on the road, but it made one helleva mess! It’s very rare that you see a stupid driver get their comeuppance so this was oh so sweet! We laughed so hard! On that very same road yesterday, I was driving in the 35 MPH section, doing 38 MPH, when an idiot in an SUV (on the phone) blew by me while in a no passing zone. Right behind him, another SUV did the same thing and passed on a double-yellow line. Proving again that bad drivers get rewarded for bad driving, there was a speed trap up the road and those two guys got pulled over. How sweet! In my pre-Prius state-of-mind I would have been incensed over the passing of ME in a no passing zone! How dare they! However, my cool, black car has taught me to relax (it's not my business anyway) and to be more tolerant of what others are doing - right or wrong. In the end what goes around comes around.
__________________ China will own the US if we don't stop borrowing for Bush's War! 2005 Black Pkg 2 MODS: Mudguards, side door trim, stiffening plate, window tint, bumper step cover AND the wonderful DICE unit. This car looks (and sounds) sharp! |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Shaklee Ind Distributor Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Connecticut
Posts: 178
My Car: 2005 Prius Package: #3 Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTM Awards: 0 Friends: 0 | <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Potential Buyer @ Apr 10 2006, 05:30 PM) [snapback]237728[/snapback]</div> Quote:
| |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hybrids and carpool lanes: No deal in sight | inventor00 | Prius and Hybrid News | 5 | 08-13-2005 04:48 AM |
| Hybrids OK in California Carpool Lanes | hschuck | Prius and Hybrid News | 0 | 08-11-2005 02:27 AM |
| Bill Allowing Hybrids Into The Carpool Lanes Passes | Arroyo | Prius and Hybrid News | 22 | 10-10-2004 01:56 PM |
| Schwarzenagger signs bill allowing hybrids in carpool lanes | jkash | Prius and Hybrid News | 1 | 09-24-2004 03:51 PM |
| L.A. Times: Gov. Backs Hybrids in State's Carpool Lane | TJ | Prius Main Forum | 17 | 04-12-2004 07:27 AM |