| | ||||||
| This is a discussion on battery technology within the Tesla forums, part of the Other Cars category; This goes for more than just the Tesla, but EVs and hybrids in general. We saw GM build a very ... |
battery technology
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 33
My Car: Other Hybrid Model: Package: N/A Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Friends: 0 | This goes for more than just the Tesla, but EVs and hybrids in general. We saw GM build a very viable electric car back in the 1990's using standard lead-acid SLA batteries. Then we saw them improve upon that using Ni-Mh batteries. I know GM tried to blame battery technology as the failure of their EV program, but we all know that wasn't true. And now they try to say the only reason the Volt is viable today is due to the better batteries available. I still don't buy it. Lithium batteries are very expensive and I certainly believe a cheaper electric car could be built based on traditional, proven, battery technologies. And I just had an interesting thought. One of the biggest concerns with lead batteries is the fact that they tend to wear out over a few years and need replacement. Well, I started thinking about that and the only thing that wears out is usually the plates inside. So I started thinking how it might be made cheaper to maintain an EV based on lead batteries. What if the manufacturer actually designed their own battery? And the battery could have some kind of removable top which is bolted down and has a rubber seal. When the battery wears out, you could take your car down to the dealer and they could just remove the lead plates, put them in a pile to be recycled, and lower new plates into the battery and bolt it back closed. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 301
My Car: Model: Package: Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Friends: 0 | Why not make the bottom of the car from plastic in the shape of a bath, fill it with acid and drop in the replaceable plates from the top. As theres so much batery in an EV why not make it part of the structure? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Cat Lovers Against the Bomb Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 11,278
My Car: 2004 Prius Model: Package: #6 Thanks: 59
Thanked 201 Times in 127 Posts
Friends: 0 | The advantage of lithium is its better weight to energy ratio. And even though lithium is more expensive, some EV enthusiasts believe that its longer life translates into lower lifetime costs. Makers of lead batteries are not resting on their laurels. They are constantly improving on batteries in terms of energy to weight ratio, power delivery, lifetime, etc. At this point, no simple suggestion like removable tops is going to change the situation. A big dichotomy is between sealed lead batteries, and floodies. Sealed are easier. There's no maintenance. But if they do lose electrolyte they're toast. That's not supposed to happen. But it does. Floodies are more durable because you can add water. The disadvantage is that you have to add water. And they give off hydrogen gas during charging. And they can spill acid. There are many different kinds of sealed batteries; every sort of scheme you can imaging for addressing the issues. But in the end, I decided that sealed are too fragile and flooded are too hazardous and both are too heavy, and I went to lithium. More expensive, but a lot lighter and more durable and should last longer. I've got lithium-iron-phosphate (LiFePO4) in both the Xebra and the Porsche. Batteries are definitely the sticking point for EVs.
__________________ Daniel Primary car: 100% Electric 2003 Porsche 911 Carrera. Estimated range at 55 mph: 81 miles total or 64 miles to 80% discharge. Top speed 70 mph. Secondary car: Zap Xebra SD, also 100% electric. 1.9 cents per mile. Range: 40 miles total, or 32 miles to 80% discharge. Top speed 35 mph. Faster downhill. Both EVs use electrons generated from water power. Gas guzzler for when I have to travel farther than 60 miles: 2004 Prius. "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." -- Emma Goldman "Anyone who has ever looked into the glazed eyes of a soldier dying on the battlefield will think long and hard before starting a war." -- Otto von Bismarck |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,546
My Car: 2005 Prius Model: Package: Thanks: 3
Thanked 183 Times in 150 Posts
Friends: 9 | any video and or pics on your "I've got lithium-iron-phosphate (LiFePO4) in both the Xebra and the Porsche" |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: North Andover, MA
Posts: 362
My Car: 2009 Prius Model: N/A Package: No Package Thanks: 3
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
Friends: 9 | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Cat Lovers Against the Bomb Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 11,278
My Car: 2004 Prius Model: Package: #6 Thanks: 59
Thanked 201 Times in 127 Posts
Friends: 0 | Quote:
That video has already been posted, and discussed at length, in the Better Place thread. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| battery, technology |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New MIT Lithium Battery technology | Steve Cebu | Gen III 2010 Prius Main Forum | 1 | 05-10-2009 11:13 AM |
| Toyota eyeing zinc-air battery technology. | jimtompkins | Prius and Hybrid News | 1 | 03-08-2008 11:43 AM |
| Hybrids sell, but lack battery technology upgrade | kram | Prius and Hybrid News | 2 | 10-15-2007 06:47 PM |
| Battery technology for Hybrids and EVs | Wiyosaya | Prius and Hybrid News | 4 | 07-26-2007 07:33 PM |
| Article from 97 shows how battery technology is already here | priussoris | Environmental Discussion | 4 | 05-22-2007 08:33 PM |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| |













