1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Do higher NO_x numbers explain Eco's much superior fuel efficiency?

Discussion in 'Gen 4 Prius Main Forum' started by Gokhan, Jan 31, 2016.

  1. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,068
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I've noticed the latest Passat ad shows auto-stop too. Recently the NHTSA has announced efforts to add, active safety features to their ranking. So I'm suggesting we're going to see more across all manufactures and models.

    BTW, I tried to get these safety features in 2009 decoupled from the extra $6,000 of 'car bling.' I came very close to walking away from a good deal. Safety is important and the sooner manufactures realize their customers will shop for safety, the better.

    Bob Wilson
     
    #41 bwilson4web, Feb 8, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2016
    kgall likes this.
  2. DieselHybrid

    DieselHybrid Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2012
    36
    10
    0
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Back to the OP:
    Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions troubles arise with lean mixtures & rapid combustion. NOx isn't necessarily a heat issue- as diesel EGT's are significantly cooler than gasoline EGT's. NOx is more dependent on combustion processes running on the lean side of stoichiometric air fuel ratio (14.7:1).

    Slowing down the combustion process for a more thorough burn & to allow more time for multiple injection cycles are some of the reasons most light-duty diesel engines have steadily decreased their compression ratios (CR) from the +22:1 range (pre-Euro regulations), to 18:1 in the 90's, then 16.5:1 in the mid-'00's- to Mazda's class-leading SkyActiv Diesel 14:1 CR (c. 2011 JDM debut). Even with this drastic reduction in CR over the decades, scrubbing NOx from exhaust gas requires diesels to utilize exhaust urea injection, SCT, or other exhaust after-burning treatments to meet reduced NOx emission requirements.

    I can't find any exhaust after-treatments being utilized in the Gen 4.

    Why the big fuss over Nitrogen Oxides? NOx lead to respiratory & cardiovascular illnesses, they are a big component of smog & acid rain formation, & they have been shown to cause premature deaths. This is why NOx emissions are heavily scutinized in the West.

    If there is a real difference in NOx emissions, it may help explain why the Eco model is rated to return better mpgs. A leaner-burning engine (as evidenced by increased NOx) would be a more credible source of improved fuel efficiency than the deletion of a spare &/or rear wiper, marginally lower RR tires, etc... :)

    Bad news is this MPG gain appears to come at the expense of higher NOx emissions. Even though the NOx increment is small- the vector is in the wrong direction.

    Perhaps this offers yet another incentive for buying a non-Eco model?

    YMMV. Drive safe!
     
    #42 DieselHybrid, Feb 8, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2016
  3. kgall

    kgall Active Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    984
    152
    2
    Location:
    Olympic Peninsula, WA
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I completely agree, Bob.
    Some lawyer, cleverer than I am, might be able to discover that a client (innocent third party) has been injured because the price of safety equipment on a given car was artificially inflated by the requirement of buying the other stuff . . .
    Ken
     
  4. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,068
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I went back and added the Gen-3 data from the EPA Test Vehicle Database:
    Represented Test Veh Model PRIUS Eco PRIUS PRIUS c PRIUS (Gen-3)
    1 Test Vehicle ID 16-ZV2H 16-ZV1H 12-NP2H 10-ZW1H
    2 Test Veh Displacement (L) 1.798 1.798 1.497 1.798
    3 Rated Horsepower 96 96 82 98
    4 Equivalent Test Weight (lbs.) 3250 3375 2750 3375
    5 Axle Ratio 2.83 2.83 3.19 3.27
    6 THC (g/mi) 0.01172 0.01438 0.00464 0.003985
    7 CO (g/mi) 0.06442 0.08763 0.04183 0.358224
    8 CO2 (g/mi) 105.40951 113.86017 117.82708 130.8100637
    9 NOx (g/mi) 0.00295 0.00187 0.00106 0.0031105
    10 CH4 (g/mi) 0.00195 0.00224 0.00077 0.0007799
    11 N2O (g/mi) 0.00135 0.01
    12 RND_ADJ_FE 84.1 78.0 75.0 66.6 (72.4)
    13 Target Coef A (lbf) 17.130 18.272 17.919 20.234
    14 Target Coef B (lbf/mph) 0.28731 0.29545 0.18180 0.01993
    15 Target Coef C (lbf/mph**2) 0.01386 0.01379 0.01556 0.01874

    • I used the California metrics but also added the (Federal MPG) who were not measuring CH4 or N2
    • Smaller axle ratio means the Gen-4 engine turns faster at any given speed, higher Coef B?
    • Other two roll-down coefficients are significantly smaller.
    Bob Wilson
     
    #44 bwilson4web, Feb 8, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2016
    douglasjre likes this.
  5. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,600
    11,224
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    I wouldn't call the reported NOx difference small, but tiny. It isn't enough to bump the car into the next smog bin, and it is still less than the reported gen3 results. We are in the range of diminishing returns, and we likely can't get a gasoline ICE much cleaner without adopting emission controls from diesels. Until we get evidence of changes in the engine and emission systems between the models, I'm going with the results for the Eco and others within the range of normal for the car.
     
  6. goldfinger

    goldfinger Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    535
    402
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    If the eco archives higher MPG simply from ECU tuning towards lean burn then why wouldn't all the models get this? Also, don't lean burn engines run hotter and suffer higher wear? Toyota had lean burn engines back in the 80s. No doubt this is newer tech, but what are the down sides?
     
    douglasjre and Trollbait like this.
  7. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    107,571
    48,862
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    if this is true, and i'm not sure it is, will it have reduced power?
     
  8. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    It is just one guy's guess, not a fact.

    Toyota outlines the steps they took that result in the Eco, not everyone want to believe that those facts are would improve MPG that much. They invent conspiracies from that lack of belief.
     
    Trollbait likes this.
  9. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,309
    3,586
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    What did Toyota say for the eco being 4 MPG better?
    1. Special LRR Tires (but eco seems to be showing up with the same tires as the other models)
    2. No rear wiper
    3. No spare tire
    4. Li batt reduces weight a few lbs
    5. Anything else?
     
  10. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    I think they are using more expensive glass to reduce heating/cooling costs.

    "The Prius Two Eco also has heat-insulating windshield glass to keep the car cooler in the summer, and a positive temperature coefficient ceramic heater to warm the cabin quickly in the winter." - 2016 Toyota Prius - NY Daily News
     
  11. goldfinger

    goldfinger Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    535
    402
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Three
  12. AKCoffee

    AKCoffee Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    46
    23
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Lowered?
     
    #52 AKCoffee, Feb 11, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2016
  13. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,600
    11,224
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    If, and it is a big one from my view, the Eco runs lean enough for better fuel economy, then it likely needs additional emission controls, and thus a higher cost.
    Lean burn can actually cool the cylinder; NOx formation is endothermic. You need high temperatures to get the reaction going, but these aren't higher than what is seen in a cylinder with stoichiometric air:fuel mix. A 2 cycle engine that relies on oil mixed in the fuel for lubrication could see higher wear when running lean.
    Many manufacturers had lean burn engines. They stopped using the technology when emission regulations got stricter. The most recent car to use it was the original Insight. Honda equipped it with a LNT. The only other cars to use them are diesels.

    It would reduce reduce power in a simple engine. In a car engine, the lean mode was only engaged are certain time; mostly steady state cruising. Call for power from the engine, and the air:fuel mix goes back to stoichiometric.

    Higher tire pressures.
    When the pressures drop on the Sonic, it can reduce the fuel economy on my commute by 2mpg.
     
    Maxwell61 likes this.
  14. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,309
    3,586
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I got:
    What did Toyota say for the eco being 4 MPG better?
    1. Special LRR Tires (but eco seems to be showing up with the same tires as the other models)
    2. No rear wiper
    3. No spare tire
    4. Li batt reduces weight a few lbs
    5. Higher tire pressure specs
    6. Low E glass for summer heat
    7. Ceramic heater for quicker heat-up in winter
    8. ?

    Anyone trying to set per tank distance records in a non-eco better take that rear wiper off!
     
    #54 wjtracy, Feb 11, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2016
    TonyWilkey likes this.
  15. kgall

    kgall Active Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    984
    152
    2
    Location:
    Olympic Peninsula, WA
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I will believe that--but wouldn't you figure that would be at least optional on the higher models?
     
  16. Maxwell61

    Maxwell61 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    384
    237
    0
    Location:
    Italy
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I did'nt meditated a lot on the decision of Hyundai for Ioniq/Niro hybrids to create 2 separate cooling circuits, one for the engine block and one for the head (and Active Grill shutter). Beeing a direct injection engine, so with NOx problems, do you think that dual circuit could sort in the same time two problems, NOX and lean burn, allowing for an optimal reduced cooling for the engine block, and so getting more easely that 40% efficiency ?
     
  17. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,600
    11,224
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    I didn't know direct injection engines had higher NOx emissions. They still have a throttle plate and valves to control the amount of air that gets into the cylinder, and thus limit the amount of unburned oxygen available to react with nitrogen. Diesels simply don't have a throttle plate. Gulping in as much air as possible, which leads to lean conditions in the cylinder for NOx formation.

    Direct injection are higher compression. That allows more work to be made from the burning fuel. The separate cooling loops in the Ioniq and others is to keep the head are cooler to reduce knock and pre-ingition for even higher compression ratios.
     
    Maxwell61 likes this.
  18. Gokhan

    Gokhan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    4,194
    1,691
    0
    Location:
    Paramount CA
    Vehicle:
    2021 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Limited
    It looks like the fuel economy of the Gen 4 Prius Eco will leave the fuel economy of the regular Gen 4 Prius in the dust:

    "Our drive included a mix of suburban driving and some freeway cruising and yielded an average of 50 mpg—according to the onboard computer in uninstrumented conditions. And a 27-mile coastal loop in the Prius 2 Eco returned 66 mpg, according to the onboard computer."

    2016 Toyota Prius Hybrid - Consumer Reports

    Consumer Reports engineers don't realize that the Prius Eco has a leaner-burning engine. They think all that fuel-economy gain is due to an insignificant weight reduction by the omission of the spare tire.
     
    douglasjre likes this.
  19. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,309
    3,586
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Conjecture on your part, right? You are saying that you feel fairly certain that there is a significant design difference, therefore you feel, when and if Consumer Reports ever tests both versions, they will see a big difference.

    I agree it would be very nice if Consumer Reports tests both versions and give us eco MPG difference on their test. However, it is perhaps wishful thinking that CR has the time to test both versions heads up like that for us.
     
    bisco likes this.
  20. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    Whew, at least they are not as delusional as some here who think Toyota has a lean burn technology they did not put all Prius for some reason.
     
    bisco likes this.