2.5" Less Rear Leg Room

A bit disconcerting to me is the fact that the 2010 Prius specs show ~2.5" less rear leg room (although slightly more knee room due to a thinner front seat back).

Is is noticeably less roomy in the back seat? Would my 6' 2" son have an issue back there?

Where did the 2.5" go? Front leg room only increased by ~0.5", so that's not the answer.

The back seat feels just as spacious as with the Gen II. I believe the issue is that the driver's seat will now push back farther, which is good for taller drivers, but reduces leg room in the back, but only if you push the seat way back.

Tom

For me, does not matter. I will never be in the back seat for one and the other fact is I'm only 5'9 so rear seat passengers won't have a problem anyways sitting behind me. All I know is I love this new car much better than the one it's replacing in the styling department. Not to mention it has many more features that I want.

I second Qbee's reply. There is more than enough backseat knee room in Gen III. Better front seat travel, and better backseat headroom are far more important. Gen II had way more knee room than necessary. And by the way the middle of the back seat is more useable for a 3rd person (nice flat seat and no cupholders to bump your knees on, though some people say they prefer the old location of those cupholders).

That is my impression also. I don't think there is any less total room. It is just the front seat has the capability of going further back. When it does, there is less room in the back.

At first I thought the added front seat travel was the answer, but then why did the front leg room only increase by ~0.5"?

FINALLY I get to answer this question! I've been waiting for it.

The reason its smaller on the spec sheet is due to the unique measurements required for the EPA. The way they are defined, it has lower rear legroom. But for practical purposes (e.g., knee room), it is actually larger than the Gen 2. Recommend you try it and prove it to yourself.

Doug Coleman
Prius Product Manager
Toyota Motor Sales, USA

I'm assuming one reason that is true is because of the scooped out shape of the seatbacks, which has not yet been mentioned. Any answer to the front legroom/seat travel question? There seems to be inconsistent information on that as well, even though there appears to be more than enough front leg room for the tall folks now.

I think the seat might be a little lower.

Hi Doug,

I found this definition on the internet, don't know if it is true:

Front leg room is the distance from the heel of the driver's accelerator foot to the seatback. Rear leg room is the horizontal distance between the rear and front seatback, with front leg room set at 40 inches.
These are measured using a 5' 9" passenger as a guide.

Is this correct? If so, then the only way I can see of having more knee room with less leg room is to increase the leg incline so that the knees are higher and further back from the front seat.

Can you confirm this please? The back seat has been lowered, the inclination of it has it deeper now, or what? Thanks.

I remember reading (I think autobloggreen) that the 2.5 inches are lost due to the fct that the front seats can be moved further back and the way the measurements are taken

could it be that the new model has a height adjustor under drivers seat that might limit toe room for rear seat passengers?