1. Offline

    RobH Senior Member

    Start a Conversation
    Member Since:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Posts:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    289
    Location:
    Sunnyvale, California
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2006 Prius
    If a 81 2A F1 81 will trigger a bus init, then TPMS is available with the ELM :).

    When I tried 83 F0 2A C1 D9 8F several years ago, there was no response. Note that the 2nd sequence uses the Mongoose id of F0, while the ELM is at F1. So maybe a 83 F1 2A C1 D9 8F would work.

    All of the F0 device addresses in my TPMS documentation need to be changed to F1 for the ELM.
    2009Prius likes this.
  2. Offline

    2009Prius A Wimpy DIYer

    Start a Conversation
    Member Since:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Posts:
    2,464
    Likes Received:
    378
    Location:
    USA
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2009 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Well I tried address 2A and got the dreaded BUS INIT ... ERROR. I then tried a few others, some got BUS INIT ... OK and others got ERROR. I guess there may be something more to the KWP bus than I had thought. :(
  3. Offline

    vincent1449p Active Member

    Start a Conversation
    Member Since:
    May 24, 2004
    Posts:
    743
    Likes Received:
    232
    Location:
    Singapore
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2012 Prius c
    Model:
    N/A
    Have you tried Fast Init, ATSP5? The data captured by RobH suggested it is using FI. I think RobH had the msg. reversed, 83 F0 2A C1 D9 8F should be the reply.

    Vincent
    2009Prius likes this.
  4. Offline

    2009Prius A Wimpy DIYer

    Start a Conversation
    Member Since:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Posts:
    2,464
    Likes Received:
    378
    Location:
    USA
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2009 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Yes I forgot to say that I tried atsp5 on address 29 and got BUS INIT ERROR, while atsp4 does work on address 29. I also noticed RobH's comments about Fast Init. I will try atsp5 on other addresses and see what happens.

Share This Page