In today's Chicago Tribune (Sunday, February 22, 2009), Jim Mateja reviewed the 2010 Ford Fusion. He reported the model he reviewed was a base model that was NOT the hybrid, but at the same time he said the hybrid would START at $27,270.
That sounds like a pretty high price for a starting point, but Jim Mateja already was crowing that it beat the Camry in MPG. (To be fair, he wasn't in a position to review and compare the two and didn't pretend to be doing so. Still, he was quick to point out the better numbers as reported by Ford (2010 Fusion vs. 2009 Camry.)
Sorry I am not providing any other references at the moment, but I'm certain someone else is likely to come up with them before I get back to PC. I only recently got to the physical paper, and I haven't yet looked at the online Tribune.
EDIT: Here is Jim Mateja's write-up: "Even non-hybrid Fusion a pleasant diverson". It is interesting that Mateja makes a claim the Fusion battery is better than the Camry battery: "And Fusion's nickel-metal-hydride battery pack is smaller, yet 20 percent more potent, so it can run up to 47 m.p.g. on batteries only."
Chicago Tribune: 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid to Start at $27,270
Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by a priori, Feb 22, 2009.