1. Offline

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2008
    Posts:
    2,760
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    Southern California
    Your Vehicle Year:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2011/05/new-technology-could-capture-solar-energy-now-wasted/

    .
  2. Offline

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Posts:
    3,768
    Likes Received:
    597
    Location:
    NOVA
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
  3. Offline

    Corwyn Energy Curmudgeon

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Posts:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    608
    Location:
    Maine
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Not really. Capturing the energy is precisely the problem.

    Energy from the Sun is intercepted by the Earth, some of it is reflected, some of it is absorbed; that which is absorbed is (mostly) converted into heat which then causes the object heated to give of infrared radiation. Some of that radiation escapes the Earth. The difference between the amount that is absorbed and escapes is Global Energy Increase. CO2 prevents some of that escaping radiation (by re-absorbing it).

    Therefore if we replace an infrared absorbing object with an infrared to electricity converter, and that electricity ends up as heat (which most of it does), then we are neutral with respect to Global Energy Increase. If we replace an infrared reflecting object instead (such as vegetation), then we are making the problem worse.

    [I am ignoring any subtleties about particular frequencies and differing absorption rates by CO2 here, as it exceeds my knowledge on the subject.]
  4. Offline

    sipnfuel New Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Posts:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    167
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    ^But with less CO2, the heat can escape more easily, but we can use it to perform "work" first on the ground before escaping

    Akin to the efficiency gained in a heat pump vs a heater
  5. Offline

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Posts:
    6,548
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Your Vehicle Year:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    It is true that single junction crystalline silicon cells cannot capture anything beyond 1.1x10^(-6) on that graph.

    But multijunction devices can reach higher efficiencies, and this seems to be another form of multijunction cell. Most existing 3- to 6-junction device appear to have a Germanium layer that reaches out to 1.9x10^(-6) on that graph, grabbing all the IR except the last two small lobes.

Share This Page