Man Based Global Warming....

You mean by creating more CO2 due to your mere existence?

 

Let me say this again! The empirical evidence (glaciers melting, temps going up, etc) are fact. First the right wing denied the existence of global warming, now they deny that humans are causing it, next they will blame it on Bill Clinton. Sound familiar?

 

Let me ignore this again! I think you meant to post on the Monica Lewinsky thread (or whatever her name was)

 

Let me google that for you

 

Inhofe Says He Will Call for Investigation on "Climategate" on Washington Times Americas Morning Show


.: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.

 

This subject is all over Drudge --- the toothpaste is most assuredly out of the tube!

 

THAT is cool!

 

Appears the warmists have run for cover --- maybe our work is done here :rockon:

 

docbooks,

I guess posting your right wing lies on a car website is special to you. Nothing you post comes from scientific journals. Der Spiegel is not a scientific journal. In fact nothing you post is credible so far. That makes you a manure speader. Something around here stinks. Can you say troll.

 

Umm. Hate to burst your bubble, but...

I Love CO2: Ice caps and glaciers growing around the world, penguins looking for warmth!

and...

2009 shaping up to be a “normal” temperature year in the USA Watts Up With That?

and why would you blame something which does not exist on poor ol' Bill? If it hadn't been for that unfortunate stain on Monica's dress, we would never have known the truth about the horny hick's lies.

Now we have the stain of leaked emails to expose the lies of climate scientists.

Let me say this again! Faked temperature records designed to exaggerate recent natural warming that lead to a conclusion of catastrophic, cataclysmic global calamities are a load of crap. Say that three times really fast.

When leftists try to remake the United States into a socialist paradise, the world into a socialist paradise, they must rely on lies. The truth will save us. Let's HOPE we can CHANGE the minds of millions of morons before it is too late.

 

Getting a tad testy aren't we, hmmmm? The left wing lies are now fully exposed to the truth, so I can see why you would be angry. I suggest you make your call to algore for the latest spin updates on your talking points. Cheerio

 

Whew!! That might be as tough as "stopping GW"

 

I guess posting your left wing lies a on a car chat site is special to you. All 11 of your posts here are designed to irritate folks who were having a rational discussion before your brilliance burst upon the scene. Can you deny you are the troll?

In case you missed it, the current discussion revoles around 'respected climate scientists' faking data published in 'respected scientific journals' whose peer-review procedures were contaminated. Please educate yourself by reading some of the posts and links before making a further nuisance of yourself. Thanks, troll.

On second thought - stick around. It looks like doc is right and the AGW religionists have ducked for cover.

Oh, on third thought, go back to thought one.

 

I have been an educator for 20 years. You are not having a rational discussion. You are trolling a car website with manure. Wattsupwiththat.com and ilovecarbondioxide.com are not scientific journals. The science written in scientific journals is repeatable by other scientists around the world. If you remember the cold fusion fiasco of a few years ago the downfall of it was that it was not able to be repeated by any other scientists. Therefore it was not accepted. I don’t think that you and your pack understand what real science is. Didn’t your teachers in elementary school teach you the scientific method? I suspect you were too busy not paying attention.

 

Any new information besides innuendo and misunderstanding from the contrarians? I didn't think so. The only thing those emails prove is that scientists are human too. Wake me up when something is published in a scientific journal.

 

Thankfully I never attended any classes at the U. of Karl Heinrich Marx -- how much tenure do you have there?

 

Do you mean a tainted journal or would you like a peer reviewed journal? Time to wake up....

 

This will get you started.

http://www.scientificjournals.org

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journal[/ame]

 

N

As an educator you should be aware that one must know something of the subject under discussion to make a rational contribution.

You are obviously unaware that there are peer-reviewed papers published in reputable journals that run counter to those promoting AGW.

Here is a link to HUNDREDS of them if you care to educate yourself:

Popular Technology.net: 450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming

Oh? you haven't seen them or heard mention of them? If you prefer to watch TV or read Time or the New York Times and other mainstream media for your knowlege of the subject, please know that you are getting only one side of the matter. If you rely on Wikipedia for information, you should be aware that there is an AGW gatekeeper installed there as well (William Connelley sp.?) who makes sure to keep out contrary views.

Yes, I do remember the cold-fusion flap. Scientists were unable to replicate the experiment, or prove the hypothesis viable. So why is it that the scientists recently exposed in climate fraud so carefully hid their data so that other scientists were unable to test their hypotheses? Ask yourself this question.

If the fate of the world rests upon the solution of this terrible man made global warming and you have the proof, why in the name of all that is reasonable would you hide the data showing this proof so that no other scientists could verify your conclusions? WHY? WHY? WHY?

Because your data are fake and disclosure exposes you as a fraud and your enormous funding (thousands of times the money spent on the papers linked above) is threatened. Now there's a hypothesis that grows more provable by the day.

These scientists have corrupted the scientific method and you and your crowd can't admit it. You'd have to say, "Gee, I was fooled. I've been misled. I've invested so much energy into proving how much I cared. I was saving the world. Look at me, I'm driving a Prius, for god's sake. I CARE. I threw out my incandescent light bulbs. etc. etc."

You and I both know you cannot do it. You cannot say you are wrong. You are a TRUE BELIEVER in the AGW religion.

 

Are you guys talking about the same scientific journals that your "respected" scientists faked data in and purposefully kept "denialist" out of? Yeah! What a credible source of info!!!11!!!1