1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

NASA GISS shows 2009 as tied for 2nd warmest year on record

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by chogan2, Jan 17, 2010.

  1. drees

    drees Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    1,782
    247
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    You miss the point completely. Yes, there is a lot that isn't settled in relation to AGW, but the major underpinnings of AGW are not under debate among climatologists.

    He has a PhD in meteorology and has been a professor at Scripps since 1979.
     
  2. Srsingsalot

    Srsingsalot Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    71
    13
    0
    Location:
    nocal
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    wow, a PhD w/o a writing course, who'd a thunk? ;)

    But, those who are still insistent on this whole 'global warming' farce seem to 'miss the point' on what has been exposed in the last few months and what continues to be exposed as more and more scientists in many fields related to climate come out of the woodwork and speak up. What they are saying has been adding more and more evidence of the scandal, not the opposite. And, at the same time, those scientists who have been blackballed all these years for defending true science are being exonerated in spades. Heck, even Algore is starting to see the handwriting on the wall and is preparing his next gloom and doom scheme. :D
     
    2 people like this.
  3. drees

    drees Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    1,782
    247
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    From my earlier link:

    Show me your published research and perhaps I'll change my mind. Until then, good day!
     
  4. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    "Somewhere in Flyover Country"
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    I think they should just say it was the warmest year by at least 5 degrees, I would love to see the data. The credibilty is 0.
     
  5. radioprius1

    radioprius1 Climate Conspirisist

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    1,355
    155
    0
    Location:
    Iceland
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Sigh.
     
  6. Srsingsalot

    Srsingsalot Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    71
    13
    0
    Location:
    nocal
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    LOL, same reaction. :D
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I would be happy and it would be good news if global warming were false. The only agenda I have is to do what I think is best for future generations. Even if there was only a 50-50 chance that I am right, I see no down side to taking the steps needed to reduce CO2 emissions. There is no down side, (except modest policy changes and modest costs now) and the benefits are potentially huge! Cheaper net/net energy, increased national security by reducing dependence on increasingly scarce foreign oil, better world security by making that oil less important in international affairs, potentially huge number of not off shoreable green jobs, both blue and white collar in Renewable energy. The only good news that I see is that technology is still our friend in this. Everyday there are advances that go towards (in small steps) solving the problem(s)

    I don't know how the denial community is going to sleep at night in a generation. How will they be able to look their children and grand children in the eye and say, "We weren't 100% sure that it was true, so we thought it must have been false, and we did nothing. We didn't do the hard stuff, we didn't even do the easy stuff, and some of us stood up and deliberately go in the way. We're sorry"

    I don't think that "We're sorry" is going to cut it. If you are wrong and I am right, the consequences going forward have the potential to be catastrophic. I hold out he possibility that I may be wrong, but he consequences of being so are slight, and may be non existent. The problem I have with the denial community is that despite considerable evidence confirm global warming, and small bits to deny it, they cannot admit the possibility that they may be wrong, inspite of the consequences. I think that attitude is just selfish
     
  8. NevadaPrius

    NevadaPrius New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    216
    20
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    1. Please learn to use the "quote" function properly.

    2. Please provide examples of this "considerable evidence that confirms global warming" that you say exists.
     
  9. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Thank you NvP,

    I indeed do not know how to properly use the quote function. I am not by nature a computer person, and it is a victory that I know how to bold. It took me a while to learn that.

    I will endeavor to try to learn so I don't risk offending anyone further.

    As to your second question, I with all due respect suggest that you open your eyes. Perhaps you could start with trip to the library, or even a google search.

    I typed into google "Is global warming real" Here is one answer"
    [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming]Global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    I could post thousands.
     
  10. NevadaPrius

    NevadaPrius New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    216
    20
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Oh my god tell me you did not just post a link to wikipedia as your "considerable evidence that confirms global warming." Post one peer-reviewed study that conclusively confirms that recent global mean temperatures are outside of what is expected by natural variations alone, ie, that humans are contributing to the accelerated warmth of the earth.
     
  11. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    You really don't have a sense of humor do you?

    Now, tell me about the quote function.
     
  12. NevadaPrius

    NevadaPrius New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    216
    20
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    I think it's rather telling of your actual knowledge behind the issues judging by the fact that your first two sources were Google and Wikipedia. Yikes. Too bad you were speaking out of your rear about having "considerable evidence that confirms global warming."
     
  13. Lewie

    Lewie Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    89
    19
    0
    Location:
    San Diego CA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Of course I know about Scripps, and I know they are a hot-bed of Climate Alarmism, but I was hoping to get the truth in a face-to-face context where they don't have to worry about loosing funding and grants. At any rate, I wasn't able to meet my friend today.

    Yes, you forwarded a number of fine links describing ocean acidification. However, I'm skeptical of ones that say "this is solid settled science", it is far from settled!

    Please permit me to offer some links offering alternative thoughts:

    http://www.co2science.org/education/reports/corals/coralreefs.pdf

    CO2 Science

    Ocean acidification

    As you know, Google and Icecap.us are your friends, and there are plenty of additional references.

    So don't worry, Drees, there's hope that the FUD of AGW isn't true. As you know, true science is never "settled". Only political science can be settled.
     
  14. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    NvP,

    Ordinarily, I wouldn't bother since A, I don't think you will bother to read it, and B, you are going to ridicule it anyway,, but what the heck, I'm bored tonight.

    The following is a pretty good summary of the issue published by the nearly controversy free Pew Research Institute. Not only that, they provide some real world suggestions as to cause/effect and solutions

    http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/Climate101-Complete-Jan09.pdf


    While not peer reviewed, (because it is a summary) it does cite a number of peer reviewed studies.
     
  15. NevadaPrius

    NevadaPrius New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    216
    20
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Can you save us the trouble, and admit, again, that you were talking out of your rear end when you said that there existed "considerable evidence that confirms global warming"? This is the exact same as your other BS statement that global warming is based on "repeatable experiments that lead to conclusive results."

    Didn't you recently post that the definition of crazy is repeating the same thing over and over, expecting different results? Do you think that those of us who actually understand the science (and pseudo-science) are going to magically forget that there is no conclusive evidence of global warming?

    You just linked an opinion piece. That is not considerable evidence confirming global warming. So first you start with google, then wikipedia, then some garbage PDF. Yikes. Please just admit you spoke from your rear and lets move on.
     
  16. Lewie

    Lewie Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    89
    19
    0
    Location:
    San Diego CA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Once again, the very first sentence is: "The science is clear: climate change is happening, and it is linked directly to human activities that emit greenhouse gases." This first sentence reveals the bias of the rest of the work. Also, references include NOAA, NASA GISS and the IPCC. Thus they are referencing compromised sources as revealed in the Climategate data and subsequent investigations. How can you divine truth from lies?
     
  17. NevadaPrius

    NevadaPrius New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    216
    20
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Easy. If it supports global warming its a truth. Otherwise it is a lie.
     
  18. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Well actually 28% of the population seem to. You provided the graph. I'm guessing not everyone is all that good with percentages.

    I wouldn't mind if 28% of the US population each gave me 25 cents, I'd be a happy man getting money from "no one".

    Energy is at 49%, what do you propose we do about energy Mr RP1?
    Maybe we can write a book about it.

    Actually I just had a thought, the lack of interest in global warming will hit the sales of your book pretty hard hey?
     
  19. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    You should post links to blogs, much better!
     
  20. TonyPSchaefer

    TonyPSchaefer Your Friendly Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    14,816
    2,498
    66
    Location:
    Far-North Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    NP: You need to eliminate the personal attacks such as "talking out of your rear end" and the rest. And for reference, if you take your above reply and replace "global warming" with "the existence of God" you just defined the nonsensical and staunch defense of the vast majority of the global population. Or replace it with "the nonexistence of God" to pick up the rest. Or replace it with "a vegan diet" or perhaps "a carniverous diet" if you want. In fact, you can change it anything anyone believes and it's just as true. So you can post that statement all you want but it's just a waste of your time and proof that you are conceding the argument and resorting to pointless personal attacks.
     
    2 people like this.