1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

2010 Toyota Prius vs Honda Civic EX-L nonhybrid

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Main Forum' started by carinpoland, Mar 28, 2010.

  1. cwerdna

    cwerdna Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    12,544
    2,123
    1
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    You might be interested in the 1st three lists I posted at http://priuschat.com/forums/other-c...s-best-worst-lists-april-2010-auto-issue.html. You can use Google as your calculator to help convert between American units and yours. (e.g. [ame="http://www.google.com/search?q=55+mpg+in+L+per+100+km&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a"]55 mpg in L per 100 km - Google Search[/ame])

    To quote from one of my (admittedly US-centric) posts elsewhere:
    Buying a hybrid doesn't need to be ONLY about saving $. How about recapturing and repurposing energy that otherwise becomes useless brake dust and heat? How about getting longer brake pad life? (many Prius owners have gone 100K+ miles on the original pads) How about emitting less CO2 and pollutants into the air? How about not needlessly running an internal combustion engine (ICE) while idling and not propelling you. How about using less of a non-renewable resource, much of which comes from volatile regions or countries that don't like us (well, the US) much?

    As for no expensive battery or inverters to worry about after 10 years... well, it seems like Honda transmissions aren't the best either. They got a bad rep w/Accord, Odyssey, Acura CL and TL transmissions in the early 2000s. Also, although CVTs aren't used in their non-hybrids, a # of Honda hybrids at Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity - Hybrid Electric Vehicles needed new transmissions and cats at ~90K miles.
     
  2. timo27

    timo27 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    316
    52
    0
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I add my voice to the others here who are saying "HONDA--BRING BACK THE CIVIC HATCH!" To the OP, another question you might ask yourself or put into your list of pros/cons: Do you prefer a stick? If so, forget the Prius. I like my Prius a lot, but I have to say, it is the first non-manual I've owned and I miss having a stick. Except when stuck in traffic. Which is a lot of the time around here...

    Good luck w/ your decision--both are fine cars.
    ~T
     
  3. Rebound

    Rebound Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    3,964
    2,613
    0
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    True story: Ten years ago, had a friend who was a financial analyst. He made a complex spreadsheet and modeled every variable, studied, researched, and concluded that the best car was a GM Saturn.

    So he bought a BMW.

    I was mostly interested in Toyota Camry. It's a more
    economical choice than
    Prius; holds my family better, cruises on the freeway better, and the total cost of ownership may be less than Prius.

    But every time I get in my Prius, I smile. I don't know why. It's the highest technology car in the world. I'm sticking it to the oil companies every time I drive. I like the car... I bought the absolute base model, and I'm gradually upgrading it myself, which is also fun.

    If you drive both Prius and Civic, buy the car that makes you happier.
     
  4. spinkao

    spinkao New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    316
    76
    0
    Location:
    Czech Republic, EU
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    You made a very good comparison yourself. If I were you and expect a lot of highway driving, I would go for Honda. It makes more economic sense for you, it has excellent reliability track record and it handles better. Civic is better highway car than a Prius, no doubt of that.

    For the Prius speaks the "geek factor", relatively roomy hatchback design and much better city fuel economy. But in your situation, I think the assets of the Civic overweights those of the Prius.
     
  5. cossie1600

    cossie1600 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    898
    92
    0
    Location:
    CT
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Just as a heads up, my uncle bought a Civic EX new. The car is smaller, the ride is harsher, also the car is much noisier. I personally hate it, but it's Honda and it will be good for 300K miles

     
  6. mmichaell

    mmichaell Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    241
    18
    0
    Location:
    chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    It seems that Honda's havent' changed. I had a '99 Civic EX - 2dr manual. Fun car to drive after I upgraded the suspension & threw on summer tires. However the road noise was pretty bad. Ppl complain about the Prius - it was nothing compared to that loud car. Car door seals let in air at highway speeds with a rushing wind noise as well. The Prius is very peaceful in comparison.
     
  7. vday

    vday Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    312
    21
    0
    Location:
    Israel
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    IMO and to the best of my knowledge Honda makes a 5 dr Civic (hatchback) for the European market
    In Israel Honda sells the 4 dr non hybrid, 4 dr hybrid and 5 dr non hybrid
    Danny​
     
  8. MSantos

    MSantos EcoAccelerometry

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    578
    250
    1
    Location:
    Canada, Winnipeg
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Technology
    I know you stated you are not a fan of the Honda IMA system, but picking the regular Civic EXL and using it as a direct alternative to the Prius is perhaps over-stretching a bit.

    In Canada, the HCH costs about the same as the Prius and depending on the Province you are in you may get up to $2000 back from the province if you buy either the Prius or HCH.

    When comparing the Prius to the HCH, the Prius wins hands down in so many areas, especially if your commuting is done in a predominantly urban setting and the temperatures are not too low.

    However, if you driving within the posted speed limits and on the highway the HCH-II is simply the better option especially if you enjoy tapping into its fantastic abilities. It it still the best kept secret for anyone who enjoys to use the least amount of fuel on the highway.

    For instance, getting 2.8-3.4 L/100km while doing 90-100km/h (70-90 MPG US @55-65 MPH) is one the things the HCH shines at and may be a better indication of personal ownership potential if this is to remain your driving regimen.

    Yes, the Civic EXL is cheaper, but it is a far noisier car with lesser aerodynamics and with far less equipment. Because it is more common in the used car market, it also offers lower resale value potential than the hybrid. Also look at the safety equipment, the HCH has more (like VSA, traction control, and much more).
    After a while, the lesser number of oil changes, brake jobs and the rest may put you financially ahead in the civic hybrid.

    I suggest that if you go Honda you consider the hybrid, but if you want the best overall hybrid then pick the Prius. ;)

    Cheers;

    MSantos
     
  9. mmichaell

    mmichaell Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    241
    18
    0
    Location:
    chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    last I checked, the '09 HCH had a very slow 0-60 of 13.9 seconds. Thats really rather bad, I think my '95 Ford Escort still had a faster 0-60 of around 11-12 seconds or so. This will at least matter for entrance ramps on the highway wouldn't you think?
     
  10. MSantos

    MSantos EcoAccelerometry

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    578
    250
    1
    Location:
    Canada, Winnipeg
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Technology

    13.9+ seconds ?

    Yes, with a depleted SoC and under the abuse of an aggressive driver.

    It scores 12.1 sec (not fast either) with normal SoC at the hands of a safe and law abiding driver.

    Cheers
     
  11. carinpoland

    carinpoland New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    27
    5
    5
    Location:
    Edmonton, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A

    "Being 9k cheaper I will only advise you to go with the Civic unless you can't afford petro or gas in the future. I wouldn't even suggest about being green because if you are you wouldn't be choosing between the Prius and the Honda Civic."

    While I like being green, I have a big problem with paying for it. It's not that I don't mind paying extra to be green. But the recent Canadian government has been absolutely resisted any laws towards making the world greener. Even oil companies, at least the big ones, follow environmental laws to a T. but the government's environmental laws are extremely lax in requirements and enforcement. As much as many companies claim they want to go green, they only do it if it saves them waste and money. Government laws level the playing field for the companies and make them spend money to go green. And I believe the same way about cars, I would be really excited the government standards increased a lot making the cars greener even if I have to pay quite a lot more for the car. But I have a problem paying for being green while standing at the lights next to a Lincoln Navigator and three other trucks around carrying one passenger. So in my mind, I'd rather spend the money to lobby for greener laws.

    "You get used to the handling and extra acceleration quickly. Stopping by gas station and cashing out often will get you over time. If you plan to upgrade to plug-in down the road, Prius is the only choice."

    First of all, you made a very good point for the hybrid. I currently fill up every 3 to 4 days and I am sick and tired of it. It sure would be nice if I could go the extra range that the Toyota Prius provides. I live in a climate where it can get up to -40. At those temperatures plug-ins would do very little, as they will drain the battery very quickly because of the heating requirement for the passenger compartment. I also commute 70 miles a day, so I would never ever upgrade to a plug-in.

    "That difference will shrink if you went with a base model Prius at $27,800 plus taxes (so about $4k cheaper than the Touring, thus making the difference closer to $3,500). In addition, there'll be no alternator to replace and brake pads will last longer (but the difference won't be as great since you do mostly highway driving and regular cars will get extended brake life too).

    After 10 years, do you want a new battery or a salvage one? It's like asking someone to get a new engine when the old one goes bust. Most will never do that. They'd rather get a salvaged engine cause it's cheaper. Same concept with the battery replacements. They're about 1/10th the cost (i.e. about $200++ vs. $2,000++).


    It seems like you're more interested in the Prius' hybrid system and not so much in its "regular" car technology (like Smart Key, backup camera, bluetooth, LED tail/brakelights, automatic climate control w/ electric A/C or LED headlights). The Civic EX-L does have heated leather seats which are only available on the top Prius model. It also has a pretty decent 6-speaker Alpine stereo.

    I think it really comes down to whether you prefer better handling (which the Civic wins hands-down) or whether you prefer the utility of a hatch, much lower emissions and better fuel economy (even if the difference is small). Also check with your insurance company. They may have hybrid discounts. (Mine gives 10%)."

    That is a good point, maybe I should be looking at the base model. After all most of the options found in the Civic are standard in the Prius. And I definitely could not agree with you more about the utility of a hatchback.

    I think this is where the real problem comes in. I have two German shepherds that I love to carry. No matter how nice the Civic is, I would love to have them separated from the front seats by some sort of mesh. This is where I think the Civic fails, as it is not a hatchback. On the other hand, this is where the Prius fails as well. While I definitely have enough room to carry the two German shepherds, there is no way to put a cage in to keep them apart from me. Having a cage in an accident is good for them and good for me. You always have to plan for an accident, because you never know when I will be in one. Even though I have not been an accident for 18 years. If I put in a cage, I would not be able to use the back seats ever, without big hassle. This almost leads me to an absurd idea about actually buying a Toyota Venza. I think the car is absurd, as it is too big and heavy to carry one person to work and back most of the time. But at the same time it allows me to put in a metal cage behind the rear seats so I can put my dogs there. It's safer for the dogs and it is safer for me. Don't get me wrong, I think both the Honda Civic and the Toyota Prius are safe cars. But if I want to carry a dog safely, a cage is a way to go. In my mind at least, it seems extremely excessive vehicle especially since back seats won't ever have anybody riding in them 99% of the time. The car actually gets 6.8 L/100km on the highway. That is definitely not great, but I could live with it. It's less than even the compact SUVs. From a safety point of view, I don't like the tall SUVs anyway. Too prone to rollovers. I know big cars mean more money for fuel and tires etc.

    "I looked at/test drove the Honda Insight and found it rougher and noiser a ride, and quite a bit smaller in the rear seat. The Civic is cheaper up front, especially the non-hybrid Civic, but do some research into maintenance costs over the long-haul. My Civic cost much more than any of the 3 Toyotas I have owned over the 10-12 years I owned them. The Prius has greater up-front cost, but in the long run I expect it will be cheaper on gas and maintenance."

    I think you made actually a very good point. With my family members owning Toyotas and I own a Honda. Looking back, I just realized that the Toyotas have actually been much more reliable over the last decade. I'm not saying anything bad about Honda, as they are a world above the GM vehicles my family had in the one still that I own. But you are right, at least in the past they have been more reliable. Things don't change that quickly, I think it's still probably true. I don't even care about the money for maintenance, just a hassle of dealing with it.

    "To quote from one of my (admittedly US-centric) posts elsewhere:
    Buying a hybrid doesn't need to be ONLY about saving $. How about recapturing and repurposing energy that otherwise becomes useless brake dust and heat? How about getting longer brake pad life? (many Prius owners have gone 100K+ miles on the original pads) How about emitting less CO2 and pollutants into the air? How about not needlessly running an internal combustion engine (ICE) while idling and not propelling you. How about using less of a non-renewable resource, much of which comes from volatile regions or countries that don't like us (well, the US) much?"

    I don't think you realize, I drive mostly on the highway. There is not a lot of regeneration or breaking going on.

    "But every time I get in my Prius, I smile. I don't know why. It's the highest technology car in the world. I'm sticking it to the oil companies every time I drive. I like the car... I bought the absolute base model, and I'm gradually upgrading it myself, which is also fun."

    While I support more efficient use of resources and the desperate need to make the world go green. Working for a major oil Corporation, them having to sign my paycheck every month, I don't think I would get the same level of satisfaction as you would. Especially since it's a nice place to work. A lot nicer than any of the other jobs in other industries I had.

    Funny how I want a full circle, from a choice between what I felt were two very good cars to thinking that my solution might actually be a car that was never a big fan of. The Venza might actually be the closest thing to meet my needs. So conflicted inside.
     
  12. usbseawolf2000

    usbseawolf2000 HSD PhD

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    14,487
    2,997
    0
    Location:
    Fort Lee, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Don't underestimate the cargo volume of the Prius especially when the rear seats are folded down. I have fit a twins size mattress.
     
  13. cwerdna

    cwerdna Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    12,544
    2,123
    1
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Also, the 2010 Prius has no belts to replace. There's literally a pulley w/nothing connected to it.
    The 1st part is actually mine. :)

    Fine, but lets go back to CO2 and pollutants. I can't speak to the specs that Canadian Civics and Priuses are rated for but per Sorted Basic Search Results | Green Vehicle Guide | US EPA, lookup greenest vehicles, check both checkboxes, 2010, California, you'll find the non-hybrid and non-CNG Civics get a 6 or 7 on the EPA pollution score vs. a 9.5 of the Prius. You can click on the cars to see what these pollutant limits correspond to (look under Standards and Smog-forming pollution) and also what they are.

    CO2 wasn't classified by the EPA as a pollutant until recently, so that relates to the greenhouse gas score. On this chart, the automatic Civic is estimated to emit 5.1 tons/year of CO2 (based on their driving cycle, which isn't all highway) vs. the Prius' 2.97 tons/year. Emission Facts: Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel | US EPA lists the # of pounds of CO2 emitted per gallon burned.

    Since you state you're doing mostly highway, I suppose you could use the CR figures of 43 mpg highway for the Civic vs. 55 mpg highway for the Prius and calculate the weight of CO2 you'll emit for a given distance.

    BTW, to make your responses to various posts easier to read (yes, quoting can be a pain), while typing, you can select the text you wanted quoted and then click the yellow ballon/caption button sort of close to the center of the toolbar. It'll surround that text w/the right tags.
     
  14. cycledrum

    cycledrum PSOCSOASP

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    8,245
    1,202
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Hmmm, you sure the Civic is a better highway car than a 2010 Prius?

    The '10 Civic I test drove would let quite a bit of noise through on rougher pavement, not really well insulated. It was alright, but I wasn't blown away. The power and responsive steering are more attractive...

    The tiny trunk / lack of cargo hold is not.
     
  15. cycledrum

    cycledrum PSOCSOASP

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    8,245
    1,202
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A

    Not surprised .... so many Americans seem infatuated with cars that have trunks. If they want hatchback, they look quickly to SUV's.

    There are smaller 4 door hatchbacks, trouble is, they are not that great to me - Golf, Mazda3, Matrix, Impreza, Versa, Spectra, HHR, Caliber, PT Cruiser, Astra (I guess not made anymore) .... these are ok , but not great.

    Prius, IMO, trumps the list above.

    There are finer choices in European 4 door hatches - Audi A3, A4, BMW, Mercedes, but then you're way up over $30k.
     
  16. cycledrum

    cycledrum PSOCSOASP

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    8,245
    1,202
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    To the OP,

    You mentioned you want to put a cage up behind the driver's seats for the dogs ...

    I might get slammed for this, but

    I peered at a Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen today ... the cargo area behind driver's seats is fairly large, definitely larger than a 2010 Prius. You could look into the TDI Sportwagen diesel which has pretty high fuel economy (definitely over 30 mpgs average). I can't speak for reliability and all, but this may be an option for you.
     
  17. Mike Dimmick

    Mike Dimmick Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    963
    247
    0
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Introduced in 2006:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    It is a 5-door - the rear passenger door handles are hidden in the bottom rear corner of the door window. As you see the styling is radical - Honda were trying to shake off a staid image.

    To me, the Civic Hybrid looks nothing like a Civic! I've seen some HCH around, so they're selling a few, but they'd likely sell more if it looked like that! On the other hand, they could be selling because the hybrid is the only 4-door saloon variant sold in the UK.
     
  18. Tideland Prius

    Tideland Prius Moderator of the North
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    44,928
    16,147
    41
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    It also has the magic seats from the Honda Fit/Jazz, right?
     
  19. Much More Better

    Much More Better Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    655
    163
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I know what you mean about people roaming around in huge SUVs. You can try to lobby for greener laws and force them to change or pay a SUV tax, or whatever. But you can't force people to change. All you can do is lead by example. One thing you can count on is that most people are like sheep. Once a certain fad reaches a critical mass, they tend to follow. Look at iPods, Yoga, recycling, physical exercise, or not smoking. As if people didn't know exercise was good for them 20 years ago. Now it's cool for moms to do it.

    I looked at the Venza too. I presume you're not considering the V6 models. Still, 19" tires are expensive. Even if you stepped down to 17" for winters, it's still a big hit. You just have to accept the price of being a dog owner.