1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Japan develops hybrid with no rare earths: report

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by cwerdna, Sep 29, 2010.

  1. cwerdna

    cwerdna Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    12,544
    2,123
    1
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Japan develops hybrid with no rare earths: report - MarketWatch


     
  2. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    It's not hard to do, but you give up the advantages of using advanced magnets.

    Tom
     
  3. bedrock8x

    bedrock8x Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    1,483
    137
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    I believe Tesla's motor does not use rare earth magnets, this is another reason Toyota wants to partner with Tesla.
     
  4. usbseawolf2000

    usbseawolf2000 HSD PhD

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    14,487
    2,997
    0
    Location:
    Fort Lee, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    It did not mention about the HV battery.
     
  5. 2k1Toaster

    2k1Toaster Brand New Prius Batteries

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    6,035
    3,855
    0
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    I dont get it...

    Rare Earth materials are pretty dang common. Rare Earth materials make superior magnets. So why are we applauding a step backwards?
     
  6. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,397
    15,518
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    This explains the rotors that I thought I saw on a special report about the Tesla factory.

    The rotors appeared to be a copper billet with slots cut parallel to the axis of rotation fed by common bus rings. If so, there would be no need for a permanent magnet rotor. From the Tesla we site:
    Motor | Roadster Innovations | Tesla Motors

    Bob Wilson
     
  7. macmaster05

    macmaster05 Senor Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    4,050
    729
    5
    Location:
    USA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    I work near the soon-to-be Tesla/Toyota factory so sometime on my lunch break I will take a peak and see what materials they are using.
     
  8. bedrock8x

    bedrock8x Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    1,483
    137
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    The advantage of using rare earth magnet is to allow lighter weight and smaller in size for a given power output electrical motor and better regen capability comparing to an common AC synchronous motor.
     
  9. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,880
    8,177
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    So Japan is saying to Get Ready - for No Rare Earth?




    :rolleyes:
    .
     
  10. xenonrider

    xenonrider Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    76
    19
    0
    Location:
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    II
    i'm pretty sure the move is not environmentally motivated. all the rear earth minerals toyota uses comes from china. the move is most like a supply issue. recently, china blocked all mineral exports to japan:

    China Blocks Rare Earth Shipments Needed by Toyota's Hybrid Cars | LiveScience Etc.

    actions like these are not uncommon. so the change to non-rare earth magnets is most likely to make sure that they are able to maintain production of their cars and not get held up by magnet supply issues.
     
  11. uart

    uart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    4,215
    1,201
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Maybe it's just a ploy to make the Chinese think that they don't need their rare earth metal so they've got a better bargaining position?
     
    2 people like this.
  12. uart

    uart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    4,215
    1,201
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Just some technical information about the original story. The two “rare earths” mentioned are neodymium and dysprosium. Of those two Neodymium is not actually scarce at all, and could easily be sourced from other places if necessary. Plain Neodymium magnets (Nd Boron Iron) are still extremely powerful, but to get the highest possible magnetic strength (and resistance high temperatures and resistance to demagnetization) about 5% of the Nd is replaced with dysprosium. It’s the dysprosium that is genuinely in short supply with regard to current demand versus known reserves.
     
  13. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    The word "Rare" in Rare Earth Elements never implied that they are scarce. Rare Earth Elements are in fact fairly common. The name comes from the fact that they are chemically very, very similar. It was extremely difficult to separate one from another. For years they were assumed to be all one in the same. Because of this difficulty with separation, it was "rare" to have one isolated from the others. Now the term serves nothing but to confuse people into thinking that they are scarce.

    Tom
     
  14. uart

    uart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    4,215
    1,201
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Yep I know that qbee. But in this case the dysprosium really is scarce. The point I was making is that PM motors could still be made without the dysprosium, but the magnets wouldn't be quite as robust.
     
  15. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    I get your point. I didn't mean to sound as if I were arguing with you. I was only using this thread as a soapbox to address a common misconception about Rare Earth Elements.

    Tom
     
  16. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    well how "rare" is rare earth anyway? as i understand it, there is a demand for the stuff that might be better served elsewhere besides personal transportation so hard to categorize this as a step backwards. maybe we need to look at it as a step in a different direction.

    we can create a piece of the puzzle that fits our current situation. might be easier than a whole new puzzle.
     
  17. uart

    uart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    4,215
    1,201
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Well like qbee already said there's not just one "rare earth", it's just the name for a family of similar metals, and some of them aren't scarce at all. Enough Nd is mined each year to make about 8 million Priuses and there's enough known reserves of Nd to keep mining it at that rate for over 1000 years and if necessary the Nd in a Prius could fully recycled anyway. So I don't see why not use it if it makes for an efficient electric motor.
     
  18. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    i see your point; but if the same element could be used in mag-lev or another more efficient form of transportation and its costs were greatly reduced because the need or demand for its use in other applications were no longer critical...