1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

How many Prius owners believe in Global Warming theory?

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by AllenZ, Oct 1, 2010.

  1. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,543
    1,558
    0
    Location:
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    You probably won't hear much more as I am sure his account is being lock as we type.
     
  2. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Well I can punch a few holes in your research.
    Australian Aborigines have lived in Australia for over 40,000 years and they migrated from Asia. Humans have been here 10,000 years according to you. FAIL!

    Oh the ice ages, no species died off in the ice ages so no harm was done. FAIL!

    Hey everyone, I'm selling my Prius so I can finally stop wasting millions and millions of dollars every year and become a billionaire!!
     
  3. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    When did Prius go into production and what on earth did they use all that nickel for back in 1970? Stainless steel and chrome? Who would have thunk it!
     
  4. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A



    Wow ... let's keep talking about the dust bowl and call me names.

    Newsflash, we've depleted no resources to exhaustion, and we're not going to.

    Deal with it.

    Y'all know oh so much, too bad so much of it just isn't true.

    You've taken on the affectation of responsible environmental consciousness and stewardship, and that is all.

    You've got blind faith and nothing to support it.

    It's a religion, and I'll give you the same courtesy as the loons that knock on my door to peddle salvation.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Empty suited drivel peddlers castigating anything and anyone they neither understand nor agree with ...

    good luck with your pet cause, inquisitors.


    .
     
  5. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    No, I do not have a reading comprehension problem, and I'll be courteous enough not to ask the same of you.

    The question was to name natural resources depleted to exhaustion ...

    and we've run out of neither wood nor fish, nor are we going to.

    Lobsters were considered garbage not long ago, fit for paupers at best, and now a delicacy.

    Overfishing may be an issue, but it is not one that isn't being addressed, and we're hardly out of fish or near out of fish.

    Have hatcheries been destroyed, are there shortages of certain overfished species in some localities ... no doubt, as we've both heard reports, but we're hardly out of fish.

    And my question, after being accused of being blind and ignorant, and now a troll, was not can you name some rare and exotic scarce hardwoods ...

    but rather what natural resources have been depleted to exhaustion,

    and had we succeeded in identifying any, we could have moved on to addressing the consequences of such depletion-to-exhaustion, and then potential solutions and alternatives ...

    but instead everyone wants to throw a hissy fit and name-call.

    It's embarrassing, really.


    Oh, I forgot to mention the dust bowl, so ... dust bowl.

    Everyone happy?
     
  6. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    I'm satisfied enough to see that that passing paragraph about having a sane discussion was completely superfluous, and that you are staying obstinant. There are plenty of examples of exhausted resources, besides the dust bowl, but there's no point bringing those up if there's no space with arguement with you. Yep, my mind is made up too.
     
  7. FL_Prius_Driver

    FL_Prius_Driver Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    4,319
    1,527
    0
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    I
    Fresh water is one. Certainly not worldwide ever, but in critical localities, quite often.
     
  8. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Right, every response to my plea for sane discussion was met with name calling,

    and no, you've not named a resource to depleted to exhaustion,

    regardless of how anyone attempts to game the question.

    We have top soil, fish, fresh water and wood, and plenty of it.

    If you want to devolve to petty, then you spelled "argument" wrong.
     
  9. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Yep, still following the same pattern....right, dodge any discussion and make it petty. Obstinant. Another historical case of resource exhaustion would be the Irish potato famine: but I already know your answer "we're not out of potatos now":rolleyes:

    extinct plants (used for wood and medicinal resources):
    trees:
    Africa




    Americas

    Asia

    Europe

    Oceania

    See also: List of extinct flora of Australia
    Plants:
    Africa
    Americas

    Asia
    Europe
    Oceania
    Extinct plant cultivars
    Fish:
    Alvord cutthroat trout
    Amistad gambusia
    Ash Meadows killifish
    Banff longnose dace
    Bezoule
    Blackfin cisco
    Blue walleye
    Clear Lake splittail
    Coregonus fera
    Tecopa pupfish
    Potosi pupfish
    Villa Lopez Pupfish
    Perrito de Parras
    Perrito de Sandia
    Cyprinus yilongensis
    Galapagos damsel
    Grass Valley speckled dace
    Gravenche
    Haplochromis gowersii
    Independence Valley tui chub
    Lake Ontario kiyi
    Thicktail chub
    Titicaca Orestias
    Yellowfin cutthroat trout
     
  10. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Yeah, you're right, we're not out of potatoes and the Pluchea Glutinosa depletion in Yemen has me all spun out.

    I continue to be amazed by the progression mindset, if I won't modify my question to suit your agenda, you go all ad hominem.

    Think I'll go have some french fries now.
     
  11. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV

    Why should it amaze you?? Your agenda is quite clear.
     
  12. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A

    Really Dave, really?

    I don't have a problem with you, nor do I have an agenda ...

    but I'm amazed at the misdirection of the responses, from name calling to demanding I acknowledge the Dust Bowl and now the Irish Potato Famine.

    We're not out of top soil, and we're not out of potatoes.

    Those are facts Dave.

    .
     
  13. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Yes, really. The examples of completely depleted resources are totally extinct subspecies of resources. Sure, "man" has found substitutes. Other examples of exhausted resources that have completely disseminated people living in the environment are shrugged off by you. I would think these types of facts would be a good middle ground for discussion, but you refuse to engage in that. Instead you distill generalities about how we're not out of general resources, and then are somehow surprised that people are engaging into name calling.

    You should face facts that humans are very predictable as far as responses. Especially when it comes down to "generalities" between progressives and conservatives. In the end, their responses are all the same.
     
  14. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    575
    107
    3
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Got it, I'm responsible for other members name-calling. Nice.

    Further, I don't refuse to engage in middle ground discussion. Happy to do it, feel free to begin.

    As for generalities ... no, I've been specific. We have top soil, potatoes, fish, wood, flowers, fresh water.

    Seems like a fair launching ground to discuss the reasons and consequences of the paucity of these very same resources in specific localities ... why it happened, and what to do about it.

    No?
     
  15. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Yes, being obstinant and refusing to talk about isolated events in exhausted resources, like the dust bowl or the potato famine, will most likely lead to name calling. What did you think would happen?

    I've already tried that....but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and will try one more time:

    I would say that still is a generality: "we" is not refering to all the population of the globe, but of wealthy nations like the US. It's refering to the areas that either have all those resources or are wealthy enough to import them. What about the estimated 884 million people throughout the world that don't have potable water, for instance? Something tells me your answer is still going to be, "but we have water"......
     
  16. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    The only silence I'm noticing is your lack of response to my question. We HAVE depeleted some resources. And some folks have listed a few. But apparently they don't meet your as yet unknown qualifications as a resources... you have not defined what you call a resource (or depletion for that matter).

    So we lose a tree species. That isn't a depletion of resources because we still have wood. So if we manage to use up all the Lithium in the world, would you say that we haven't depleted it because we still have other elements?

    We need to know what "resources" are. We need to know what "depletion" is. Otherwise, there's only arguing in circles.

    Would love to! But I don't yet know the rules after asking twice now. Well, three times now.
     
  17. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    We can never hit a target that keeps moving. You've not defined resource nor depletion. So... uh... who's winning?

    Not trying to be petting. Just trying to figure out who's got the rule sheet for the game we're playing.
     
  18. Stev0

    Stev0 Honorary Hong Kong Cavalier

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    7,201
    1,073
    0
    Location:
    Northampton, MA
    Vehicle:
    2022 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Pssst, you can never win with a troll. Don't bother.
     
  19. davesrose

    davesrose Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    767
    164
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    I submit that we're not playing a game with philobeddoe...nore does he want to actuall engage in true debate....instead, I see this:


     
  20. Trebuchet

    Trebuchet Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    3,772
    936
    43
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    I thought "Global Warming" was? That's why I'm a bit confused by the almost 12 year global cooling trend. Am I wrong?