1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Will there ever be a fix for the MPG estimates?

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Fuel Economy' started by s1njin, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. s1njin

    s1njin New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    106
    4
    0
    Location:
    Sellersville, PA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Just wondering what people's gut reaction is to Toyota possibly fixing the over-estimation of mileage in the Prius. Seems most folks are getting between 5 - 10% generous mileage estimates when compared to computing manually.

    Are we stuck w/ this? Or do you think we'll get a TSB/patch to make it a little better?

    Also, for what its worth I'm going to try driving the car more like, well, a car for a tank to see if that has any effect. I did that today, and instead of my CONST reading out at 60 or 61, its now reading at 57-58. Maybe my percentage differance will be much smaller. Hopefully the differance is not the same and I just got worse mileage.

    Maybe the mileage estimates go all wonky when you try to hypermile as opposed to just driving and letting the computers do the thinking ...
     
  2. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,543
    1,558
    0
    Location:
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Good question. Perhaps Toyota needs to know that it is a problem first. I suspect we all need to contact them all at once for them to realize there is a problem.
     
  3. Felt

    Felt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    1,624
    603
    0
    Location:
    Mountain West
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    I suspect it has something to do with salesmanship. Most drivers (perhaps excluding Prius owners) do not ever calculate the fuel efficiency. I confess, when someone rides in my car and they exclaim what wonderful fuel efficiency. I silently think well in truth, it is 3 mpg less. Perhaps Toyota purposely mis-leads owners .... but my brand new CRV is not dead-on accurate either, and I suspect few vehicles are.

    My personal view is that I am deeply grateful, and satisfied, that my Prius is performing so well. I am not too critical of a small error in the display. If I let that disturb me, I would be in constant turmoil from just about every aspect of our society: unfulfilled political promises, biased media reporting, unreliable weather reports, to airline schedule delays. Our society is not perfect .... why should we expect perfection in our vehicles instrumentation? especially if there is some corporate advantage to "fundging" a bit in the positive. I have never heard of a vehicle that underestimates the fuel efficiency.
     
  4. pakitt

    pakitt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    2,173
    1,311
    0
    Location:
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2021 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Limited
    For me it is not a true problem if the error remains constant (e.g. 6% like now). If it changes, then the indication is not at all reliable, and I would require a fix. If it is constantly making the same mistake, it is not accurate, but at least not broken.
    Likely for cost reasons they decided not to make it more accurate. I think there are technical challenges to correctly estimate/measure the actual fuel consumption in a car, that only very costly solutions can address - probably it was estimated that a 5% (in fact higher, including pump "mistakes") was acceptable and not so many Priuschat members would measure it so *accurately* as we did... :)
     
  5. San_Carlos_Jeff

    San_Carlos_Jeff Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    871
    160
    0
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2012 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    N/A
    I wonder if it's worse on the latest generation or it varies a lot. I keep detailed records on my 2005 and over the first 74,000 miles the difference between the computer and actual mileage is 2.69%, with the computer being on the optimistic side. It would be nice if the owners could "dial" in their own correction factors, but in my case 2.69% seems close enough.
     
  6. tumbler

    tumbler New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    32
    3
    0
    Location:
    Knoxville
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    I fully understand the desire for accuracy of data presented by the car. I look at the bar charts for the shape and variance between other bars, not for the absolute value of the bars (quantitative). I suppose that is because I am not a hyper-miler, just an average driver who gets a kick out of this car. In short, I look for changes in their shape (height) relative to one another in order to see trends and general information. I doubt that I will ever calculate what the actual mileage is, rather, I will just scan the bars. I do wish Toyota had made the Y-axis a little more detailed, such as the low value being, say, 30-MPG and the high being 75 or so since this is where the car spends most of its time.


    Enjoy the ride!
     
  7. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    For the Gen III owners that keep careful records it appears to be fairly consitantly close to 5% optimistic when averaged over several tanks. It looks like the 5% optimism is intentional.
     
  8. Bob Comer

    Bob Comer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2010
    708
    454
    0
    Location:
    South Carolina low country
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    Well I'm up to 5900 miles, so it just a baby, but my error rate is anywhere from 7.2% to 10.6% differences so far. The average is 8.7%.

    Otherwise nothing else is going wrong, so it just looks like a calculation error

    I wonder if V's have a higher error rate because of the 17" tires...
     
  9. s1njin

    s1njin New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    106
    4
    0
    Location:
    Sellersville, PA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    See? This is what I'm talking about. If it was a relatively constant error I could deal w/ it. These swings though drive me nuts - I haven't even filled up a 3rd time but my first two were pretty far apart in accuracy. I'd like to have a clue where my miles are going to be when I look at all the information that is presented to me on the console/hud.
     
  10. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Bob's numbers are a relatively constant error for real world measurements using what we the general public has available, the average was 8.7% and the variation is +1.7%/-1.5%.

    Assuming a fill up is 9 gallons, 1.5% of 9 gallons about 1 pint or about 1/8 gallon. A fair share of that difference could be differences in how the tank was filled and a smaller amount of it pump error. If the MID display were perfectly consistent (I'm not saying it is) you could still get variations like that.
     
  11. finman

    finman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    1,287
    111
    0
    Location:
    Albany, OR
    Vehicle:
    2014 Nissan LEAF
    how do you know the pump numbers are accurate? is it actually filling 9 gallons? maybe 9.03? 8.97? Isn't the Prius fuel metering very accurate (injector counts and flow thru?) And does it matter when emissions are lower too, but no one complains about the air we need to breathe? sorry, too many questions...
     
  12. Electra

    Electra New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    1
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    I've had the same optimistic numbers from my 2010, but last summer I took it on a trip and found that when you drive continuously at freeway speeds for 600+ miles the computer actually indicated less than the actual mileage.
     
  13. Bob Comer

    Bob Comer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2010
    708
    454
    0
    Location:
    South Carolina low country
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    That's a good point -- perhaps the couple of gas stations that I frequent aren't all that accurate in measuring what they pump. I suspected one of them wasn't but not the other. Maybe they don't inspect them as often around here...
     
  14. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    No doubt there are out of calibration gas pumps and crooked gas station operators, but I think the biggest difference is the consumers ability to consistently fill their tank. That is compounds by differences in when the gas nozzle clicks off and any slight sideways tilt of the vehicle.

    Legally required pump accuracy varies by jurisdiction but 1/2 of 1% or less than 1 cup in 10 gallons, or 1/2 of 1/10 gallon is common. It would be difficult to consistently your tank to that level of accuracy given a perfectly accurate pump.
     
  15. jstack

    jstack New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    211
    38
    12
    Location:
    Chandler Arizona
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    I
    The car is OK ,it's the loose nut behind the wheel. I get 10%-25% better than their estimate. Maybe you should drive a little slower and let up just a little once your up to spped. That puts the CVT tranny into super efficient gearing and you do much better. It's all in the driver.
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Did you read the thread before you responded?:eek:
     
  17. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    107,571
    48,862
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    you could fill a 5 gallon gas can and visually get a pretty good idea of how accurate the pump is.
     
  18. Bob Comer

    Bob Comer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2010
    708
    454
    0
    Location:
    South Carolina low country
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    It's a pity they don't have some kind of visual gauge built in to make it easy to fill the tank to the same spot...
     
  19. xs650

    xs650 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    4,539
    1,433
    9
    Location:
    Northern California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    On the Gen III you can carefully fill it until the gas level is visible.

    That still doesn't correct for any slight tilt of the car which as a PDOMA could easily make a 3+ tenths of a gallon difference.
     
  20. Bob Comer

    Bob Comer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2010
    708
    454
    0
    Location:
    South Carolina low country
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    Or out of spec pumps!

    I know, it was a bad idea.

    I guess nothing short of more hardware and software to measure the exact gas usage. (and thus more cost...)