1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

what is the military price of oil use, $500B or $0

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by austingreen, May 20, 2012.

  1. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    As you may know, Medicare and Social Security have dedicated taxes which have generated a SURPLUS of $4T over the last 30 years so take them out of the graphic. Then you find military spending jumps to 70% of the cost of Federal government and 70% of the US deficit and the $14T in debt run up from $900B in 1980 to $14T today with 30 years of oil war preparation and 20 years of continuous Middle East oil war.

    Social Security and Medicare have not contributed anything to US deficits and debt.

    The cost of oil wars. 80% of the US debt of $14T. 80% of current deficits. Oil's other big economic impact is the $500B oil trade deficit tax for the 4B barrels of oil we import. We import that oil, 50% of oil needs, because we are 50% less energy efficient than Europe, Japan on other modern economies. If we spent the $1.4T per year we spend for military for oil on making US more energy efficient we eliminate the $500B oil trade deficit tax and we eliminate $500B per year in Federal spending on military to secure oil. A 7% boost in US GDP to get US out of the Great Recession, caused, in part by the $14T wasted on military spending to secure oil.
     
  2. ETC(SS)

    ETC(SS) The OTHER One Percenter.....

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    7,753
    6,553
    0
    Location:
    Redneck Riviera (Gulf South)
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    How could anyone possibly argue with a statement like that?
     
  3. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,530
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    I am under the impression that SS is solvent (anticipated) for another decade or two. I doubt the same can said for Medicare, but I do not know figures.

    SS contributions have always gone into the general fund of congress where they were spent, but that is not the same thing as saying SS has not been taxed commesurate (sp?) with payments.
     
  4. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Medicare requires funds from General Fund but Social Security does not and is, in fact, still generating a surplus though it is a bit of an accounting trick in that the $4T that SS loaned to US government is earning "interest" as SS purchased Treasury Bonds which pay it interest.

    But taken together, SS and Medicare have run a surplus to date of about $2T. So when we hear anyone say SS and Medicare need to be cut back due to the deficit and debt, it's a complete lie as they have run a surplus and will for another 10 years or so. 20 years if you just look at Social Security.

    2011 Federal Budget less Social Security and Medicare
    $2,038T
    Defense spending $1,415T
    Everything else $623B

    70% of US budget. 70% of US deficit and debt.

    Defense-related expenditure 2012 Budget request & Mandatory spending Calculation
    DOD spending $707.5 billion Base budget + "Overseas Contingency Operations"
    FBI counter-terrorism $2.7 billion
    International Affairs $5.6–$63.0 billion
    Energy Department, defense-related $21.8 billion
    Veterans Affairs $70.0 billion
    Homeland Security $46.9 billion
    NASA, satellites $3.5–$8.7 billion Between 20% and 50% of NASA's total budget
    Veterans pensions $54.6 billion
    Other defense-related mandatory spending $8.2 billion
    Interest on debt incurred in past wars $109.1–$431.5 billion Between 23% and 91% of total interest
    Total Spending $1.030–$1.415 trillion

    Entire focus of US military spending, has been build up for oil wars 1980-1990 and then continuous invasion and occupation of Middle East oil fields 1990-2012.

    As Colin Powell pointed out, there are no military threats to US in the world today. Certainly not Russia at $100B a year or China at $150B a year, both with US allies on their borders spending as much as Russia (UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland) and China (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam). Only the VERY COSTLY $1T a year oil war operations, ongoing for 20 years.
     
  5. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Since SS has run a $4T surplus over last 30 years, no one can argue with the statement. If we say that SS has lent Medicare its general fund requirements of $100B average over last 20 years when it started to run deficits due to magical thinking of lowering taxes vs. increases to pay bills, then together the two "ENTITLEMENTS" one hears shouting about from certain political ideologues have run a collective $2T surplus over last 30 years.

    During that time US debt has gone from $900B in 1980 to $14T in 2008.

    Since none of this debt is from Social Security and Medicare, supported by their own dedicated payroll taxes running at $2T collective surplus, the rest of the US budget created the debt. Looking at what's left in US budget, military spending calcs out at 70% of US budget. A little lower in the oil war build up phase, 1980-1990, a bit higher in the actual oil war phase 1990-current.
     
  6. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Hey ETC,

    It was a NYT/CBS poll and their wording. Don't let the rambler take things so far out of context.

    The poll found the majority did approve of cutting the military budget. This goes along with this news item.

    Defence spending cuts: The informed majority | The Economist

    When participants were asked to get more specific and propose changes to the levels of spending in nine areas, a majority cut all nine. "All areas combined were cut 18% on average, with Republicans cutting 12% and Democrats 22%," the study notes. Most participants were surprised by the level of America's defence spending when it was held up against the rest of the discretionary budget, historical levels of spending, and the defence spending of other nations.​

    Clearly armed with good information the people would like higher military cuts. Ron Paul and Barney Frank proposed cutting 25%, but got less than 10 other congressmen behind the plan.

    Completely off topic here, but in someones mind, if you look at medicare as a insurance type trust fund, it is in severe actuarial deficit.
    Trustees Report Summary
    The projected 75-year actuarial deficit in the HI Trust Fund is 1.35 percent of taxable payroll, up from 0.79 percent projected in last year’s report. The HI fund again fails the test of short-range financial adequacy, as projected assets are already below one year's projected expenditures and are expected to continue declining.​

    This means that deficits will roll up or taxes increased for medicare and social security. According to the trustees

    Conclusion
    Lawmakers should address the financial challenges facing Social Security and Medicare as soon as possible. Taking action sooner rather than later will leave more options and more time available to phase in changes so that the public has adequate time to prepare.​
     
  7. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    I'd suggest the Reagan solution, increase the SS and Medicare taxes to pay for the services. This would be a CUT to SS taxes as it will run a surplus to 2025 at current pace. This would be small 1.2% increase in Medicare tax or zero if one simply applied the Medicare tax to all income, in which case a cut in payroll tax for most people.

    We could let Social Security forgive the $4T it lent to the Pentagon for oil wars, reducing US debt from $15T to $11T, reducing the Interest on Debt, now 6% of total Federal budget, to 4.5%, in effect cutting Federal budget by 1.5%.

    This would require increasing SS tax but again, by applying SS tax to ALL income, this would mean a slight reduction for those paying their SS tax out of payroll deductions.

    A huge immediate fiscal plus for US, reduction in Federal spending, reduction in deficit, reduction in debt, SS and Medicare fully funded.

    We would need to address the military spending crisis, the 70% of the Federal budget that is bankrupting the nation. Cutting Defense budget from $700B to $300B (Russia and China combined) seems practical.
     
  8. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    On medicare let's face it, its public health care, not really public health insurance. If we can be honest about it then the solution becomes much easier. Costs can be cut, by means testing and allowing those with higher incomes to pay for part of it in their retirement. Costs may be able to be cut in other areas. Taxes also may need to be raised by raising the cap, or eliminating it and/or raising the rate. Health care costs are rising, and the current system is insolvent. One source of medicare money could be oil taxes as this would be replacing one regressive tax with another it would not hurt the poor.

    On Social Security, it also has obligations greater than its assets. That is unless you just want to call it pay as you go and increase taxes all the time as more people retire. Social security only has an accounting surplus and this will crash and burn in 20 years. If you are 30 now, that means much higher taxes in the future and lower benefits. I'd like younger people to be able to opt out, and older people taken care of from the general fund. At least that would stop people from being forced to join the bottom of the pyramid.

    And as if you didn't know there has been a payroll tax holiday in 2011 and 2012 to stimulate the economy, so social security has been being paid from the general fund. There its just accounting tricks to make you think they are separate.

    The debt is the debt, you just want to create another accounting trick. The money is in t-bills that the country owes itself and is rightly counted as the debt. A corporation would need to actually count a higher debt for future obligations in a pension fund, but the government has different rules.


    You still have a little trouble with your math.
    Policy Basics: Where Do Our Federal Tax Dollars Go? — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
    Defense is about 20% of the budget, and it is not for defense it is for the military. I can't imagine the country needs 25,000 men in korea to defend this country or much of the other cold war spending still going on. If you count payments for past wars and other domestic programs related to the military as some anti war groups place it is as of 2009 54%. That number seems very high and your 70% somehow claims something higher.

    The Federal Pie Chart
    Note you can't really cut the budget for past wars 18%, and congress has put rules in place to not be able to cut certain items like carrier groups and nuclear warheads in the budget process. These rules should be changed and much of that 36% should be cut. Cuts take time, Afghanistan won't be rolled up until 2014, bases won't get closed in an election year, but the country needs to start now.
     
  9. Hidyho

    Hidyho Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    2,698
    529
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Iraq and Afghanistan have not been paid for, in fact a tax deduction (tax cuts) was put in place to no even remotely pay for them, they were designed to be nothing but a debt builder. When you add in all the secret bases and all the other "secret" initiatives, that 70% seems very accurate, especially when you consider that a good percentage isn't even taken into account, the long term increased medical care.
     
  10. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Paying or not paying for something does not make it a bigger part of the budget. It's simply accounting, and there is plenty of bad accounting in congress to hide where money comes from and goes. I do agree that future veterans benefits should be accounted for, but this would also mean that medicare and social security obligations also need accounting and that is the third rail of politics.

    From the previous links, how can you get to 70%. The supplemental in 2012 is much smaller, so it should be easier in 2011 to get a higher percent.

    In fiscal year 2011, the federal government spent $3.6 trillion​

    Of that $3.6 trillion, $2.3 trillion was financed by federal tax revenues. The remaining $1.3 trillion was financed by borrowing​

    In 2011, 20 percent of the budget, or $718 billion, paid for defense and security-related international activities. The total also includes the cost of supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, funding for which totaled $159 billion in 2011.​

    Social Security: Another 20 percent of the budget, or $731 billion​
    Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP: Three health insurance programs - Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) - together accounted for 21 percent of the budget in 2011, or $769 billion.​

    70% of the budget is 2.5 Trillion. The budget less social security, medicare, medicaid, and chips is $2.1 Trillion. How can the military grow to $2.5 Trillion? To do this you must label all other government spending as military, and include parts of social security and medicare into the military budget.
     
  11. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three

    Bzzt. Wrong answer. Social Security is not part of the budget. It has its own specific tax base. The Federal Budget can borrow money from SS or lend money to SS but SS is NOT PART OF THE BUDGET. SS HAS NOT ADDED A DIME TO DEFICIT OR DEBT.

    Bzzt. Second wrong answer. Medicare has its own tax and is not part of the budget. Again it can lend or borrow from the Federal budget.

    Answer to both is that the taxes for both SS and Medicare needs to equal the payments and automatically adjust as needed. Right now that would mean a tax cut for SS and a tax increase for Medicare.

    Second answer is that SS and Medicare apply to ALL income not just payroll income. This would result in a tax cut for SS and Medicare for 99% of those with payroll deductions now (and for their employers) and would, applied at current rates, fix the 2025 deficit for SS and the small current deficit for Medicare.

    SS "forgives" the $4T it is owed and US debt is reduced by 25%, US Federal budget is reduced by 1.5% (interest on the debt drops from 6% to 4.5%).

    Back to the $14T in debt run up by the actual Federal budget over last 30 years for which 70% is military spending as documented up thread.

    A gasoline tax dubbed the "Patriot Tax" (for all those Fox News viewers) to pay for current military costs of $1.4T and to start paying off the $14T in debt the oil wars have created over the last 30 years would be appropriate. It works out to a $7 a gallon tax on gasoline. Which, interestingly, puts US gasoline prices inline with Europe's where they are 50% more energy efficient. If US were as energy efficient as Europe, we don't need to import oil, we save the $500B per year in the oil trade deficit tax for 4B barrels of imported oil and we save the $500B cut to military budget which in turn lowers the "Patriot Tax" on gasoline.

    Elegant solution.
     
  12. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Wow, I feel so wrong. Wait no I don't. That data was from a source that got it from the US government budget. Its freely available, and indeed Social security, medicare, medicaid are all part of the unified budget. You do need to be able to read and understand. This has been the case for over 40 years, perhaps you are so old that you remember the old system of separate budgets and haven't heard about the change yet.

    Next point, is social security has its own tax base. I'm not sure how to handle that one, it is a payroll tax on earned income, but it applies to everyone that earns an income. You may be retired and not understand that the payroll tax was lowered temporarily in 2011 and 2012, and this would have affected the taxes you paid. The money to make up for the tax cut came from the general fund. Medicare has multiple parts, and over 40% of its funding also comes from the general fund. Which means that these payroll taxes are still taxes, they just have different names. Most of the same people pay them, and money for all the taxes is used for spending the the federal budget.

    Both entitlements are part of the mandatory part of the budget, perhaps that is part of your confusion and you did not just miss the last 40 years of budgets. Being mandatory only means the budget does not need an appropriations bill. In the health care bill medicare "savings" were used to help pay for it. The congress can change the entitlements when it deems necessary.

    As to deficit social security has until 2011 been used to reduce the stated budget deficit, but not the debt. In 2011 social security paid out more than payroll taxes and interest took in, and it added to the deficit. There is a positive ballance though so it can not be thought to add to the debt the way it is currently accounted for. In future years it will add more to the deficit, and around 2033 will start adding to the debt if not reformed. If it followed pension accounting rules it would be currently adding to the debt, as obligations are higher than assets. I am quite sure this is all over your head, and you will shout something else out. Medicare is already adding to the deficit and debt. It is much easier to cut military spending than do anything with medicare or social security, and that is why the poll I linked had the majority favoring defense cuts. That does not mean social security is not part of the budget and will not add to both the debt and deficit in the future.
     
  13. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Trust your feelings Padawan.

    Social Security and Medicare have dedicated taxes and are not part of the general budget.

    The key is SS has run a $4T surplus over last 30 years and Medicare and SS combined can be correctly be credited with a $2T surplus.

    So none of the deficits over the last 30 years or the $14T in debt they created was caused by "Entitlements" (Social Security and Medicare).

    Since military spending at $1.4T per year is 70% of the actual US budget of $2.48T (using 2011 budget numbers as an example) we can correctly assign 70% of the deficit and resulting $14T in debt to military spending.

    Since military spending from 1980 onward was a build up to the Middle East oil war (1980-1990) and then the actual Middle East oil war (1990 to present), the deficit and debt are rooted in US military spending for the oil war.

    The "Patriot Tax" on gasoline and Diesel, every red blooded and blue-blooded American will be stepping up to the pump to do their part to pay for the Oil Wars. $10 a gallon gasoline. Maybe we should call it the "Freedom Tax".
     
  14. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    You obviously can not read, or can not understand things. Medicare and social security are part of the unified budget.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/socsec.pdf
    All the budget papers from congress and the whitehouse have social security as part of the unified federal budget.

    You can find other budget documents there, or look at the summary I provided from another source
    Policy Basics: Where Do Our Federal Tax Dollars Go? — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

    Yelling things are not true, without checking them out, is pure ignorance. Please old dog, try to learn a new trick and read some sources instead of making up your own stuff. I would rather have you spreading facts than your ignorance.

    Do you have some source of this ignorance that makes you think the social security is not part of the unified budget?[/quote]
     
  15. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Not really due to the fact of separate and independent tax bases. They are prescribed entitlements not appropriations budget items.

    The key, as always, is that Social Security and Medicare taxes have run a collective $2T surplus over the last 30 years and have not contributed to the deficit or $14T debt accumulated over last 30 years.

    Which brings us to the topic of "Cost of Military Budget" which is 70% ($1.4T out $2.6T) of Federal budget using 2011 as example but applicable for last 30 years.

    With the oil wars, 10 years of preparation and 20 years of fighting them, being the bulk of US military spending, especially in the area of VA health care costs as wars run up huge costs in human terms and these run, literally for lifetimes. We can assign the cost of US military oil wars as 70% of current US budget, 70% of US deficit and 70% of the $14T debt. Time to belly up to the bar and for oil and gas to pay back their military cost with a $7 gallon tax on oil use.
     
  16. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Chuckle...the "unified budget" was done to HIDE the fact that SS and Medicare were running surpluses while the Federal budget was running deficits. Ironically this was first done by LBJ during the Vietnam War to hide the military costs and the fact it was military and war cost that were causing deficits.

    Same as now. Here's the history of the "Unified Budget" scam.
    Going forward...note that 1990 was when the oil wars began and continue to this day.
    So back to topic...with SS and Medicare running $2T collective surplus over last 30 years, not contributing to current deficits or the $14T current debt run up over the last 30 years of the Oil Wars era, we can clearly state that oil war military costs of $1.4T per year are the basis of US deficit and debt.

    Pay up.
     
  17. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,574
    4,113
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    You looked like you were learning something in the first paragraph, and then poked the pooch. Sorry I can't get to the next tiny point if you don't understand the unified budget, so I'm done with you. You may want to check with the gao and see if that 1990 or 1983 law actually changed anything on the budget? You may also want to investigate the term ironic. Its not ironic at all that a president would change accounting to not raise taxes while running a large deficit, its what they do. We also have had unified budgets for over 40 years, which means.....
    For all those years and all those presidents cold, war, stagflation, berlin wall, etc the payroll taxes have been paying the general fund expenses. In return the treasury has given the trust funds an IOU. There is no cash only a promise, and the treasury bills are non-negotiable, meaning congress is the only one that convert them to cash.

    If you caught up, you will see there is about $2.6T of promises in the trust funds, along with much higher obligations. Starting last year expenses exceeded payroll taxes which means instead of hiding the deficits these things are starting to enlarge them. Its small now, but its going to get bigger, and the money to pay for those IOUs comes from the general fund. See, no real line or lock box, just a law that doesn't separate anything. I expect taxes to go up and those of us at the bottom of the pyrimid to pay. There is no real surplus. But stick to your ignorance.

    CQ | Social Security’s Planned Shortfall Raises Concerns
    Social Security’s trustees predict that by 2020, the trust funds will top $3 trillion and then start to decline. By 2033, Treasury will have paid back all the loans it received from Social Security and the fund balances will be zero. From that point forward, Social Security will be able to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits, based on projections of payroll tax receipts.​
     
  18. ProximalSuns

    ProximalSuns Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    1,877
    21
    27
    Location:
    PNW
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    I thought this explained the "unified budget" perfectly. It was created as a legal artifice to show the Social Security and Medicare programs as part of the Federal budget, which they are not really being entitlements and having their own separate tax bases, in order to hide the deficits of the Vietnam War just as it is now used to hide the deficits and debt of the oil wars.
    As it further noted in the link above, this artifice was cleared up.
    Again keep your eye on the prize. The military cost of oil. Since we know that SS and Medicare have run a collective $2T surplus over the last 30 years, they have not contributed to the deficits or the $14T in debt created over the last 30 years.

    With military spending at 70% of the US Federal Budget and oil wars being the bulk of US military spending for the last 30 years, the oil wars have run up $14T in debt and are $1.4T of current US Federal Budget of $2.04T (2011 budget numbers).

    We have to get $14T in past costs and $1.4T per year out of oil use since this is how much it has cost and is costing in military expenses...the military cost of oil.