1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

IIHS: Prime > Volt, i3, Model S

Discussion in 'Prime Main Forum (2017-2022)' started by Insirt, Feb 4, 2017.

  1. Insirt

    Insirt Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2016
    50
    59
    0
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus


    Quick video shows that the BMW i3 and Tesla Model S have good but not top-notch safety. The Volt and Prime, however, are both Top Safety Picks with the Prime being slightly better due to the standard TPPS with front crash prevention.

    I didn't get my Prime because of safety and thought maybe the higher weight might make the Prime less safe, but I happily stand corrected.
     
    JoePriusPrime and Lee Jay like this.
  2. mr88cet

    mr88cet Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    2,306
    1,330
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    FWIW: I don't have the URL offhand, but I recall having see IIS video showing that the Leaf did rather badly.
     
    Insirt likes this.
  3. 'LectroFuel

    'LectroFuel Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2016
    880
    673
    0
    Location:
    San Juan Capistrano, CA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    How are the Prius gen 4 headlights changed for the 2017 year? IIHS rates them as Poor for 2016 and Acceptable for 2017. Did they make the headlights shine even higher into oncoming traffic???

    The gen 4 and Prime seem to be some of the safest cars IIHS has tested. They never mention a risk of injury to any body part. I've never seen that before.(y)
     
  4. EV-ish

    EV-ish Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    602
    278
    0
    Location:
    SW US
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    I have learned to read these crash tests and grades with some skepticism. As new tests are added the old models tend to do poorly on them until the next model revision. This test inflation makes the old models look bad (rather than slightly less good,) and masks the more fundamental safety differences between models.
     
    'LectroFuel and bwilson4web like this.
  5. 'LectroFuel

    'LectroFuel Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2016
    880
    673
    0
    Location:
    San Juan Capistrano, CA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Well, they have to update their tests sometime. It makes sense because the newer cars are generally safer than the older platformed cars. TNGA seems to do very well.
     
  6. EV-ish

    EV-ish Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    602
    278
    0
    Location:
    SW US
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    I wasn't implying that increased test demands are bad per se, only that the ensuing report card gets skewed until the next car revision.

    In general, the new tests are improving safety at the margin but each test holds equal weight in the report card which does not reflect the overall safety of the car. I presume the report card is handled this way to pressure the manufacturers to address the test. Like NCLB, the test becomes the target.

    Result ? Read the report card with a skeptical eye.
     
    'LectroFuel likes this.