SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19)

It's an intriguing line of research that will likely continue
.

 

The actual study is here; CIMB | Free Full-Text | Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line | HTML

They explained their choice of concentrations in the discussion, "The choice of BNT162b2 concentrations used in this study warrants explanation. BNT162b2 is administered as a series of two doses three weeks apart, and each dose contains 30 µg of BNT162b2 in a volume of 0.3 mL, which makes the local concentration at the injection site at the highest 100 µg/mL [31]. A previous study on mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses using a similar LNP delivery system showed that the mRNA vaccine can distribute rather nonspecifically to several organs such as liver, spleen, heart, kidney, lung, and brain, and the concentration in the liver is roughly 100 times lower than that of the intra-muscular injection site [38]. In the assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by Pfizer, the pharmacokinetic distribution studies in rats demonstrated that a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total dose distributes to the liver [26]. We therefore chose to use 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL of vaccine in our experiments on the liver cells."

In corporate mRNA might be too strong. The study did show the cells reverse transcribing the mRNA into DNA, but did not find evidence of that DNA then being incorporated into the cell genome.

 

It is a Nigerian operation:

Address: 14 Edem Ekpenyong Street By Akim Timber Market, Calabar, Cross River State 540241 Nigeria

That article starts with:
"ER Editor: The report from The Epoch Times below ..."

Does everyone here remember previous discussions of The Epoch Times?

 

Is there a study showing the relative impact of COVID on the DNA of the dead DNA versus the living?

If you live with DNA modifications but die without ... I'll take living.

Bob Wilson

 

Here are three videos from Dr. Been that explains the research using some colorful pictures that I found easier to understand:

1st: Pfizer Vaccine Becomes DNA in Liver Cells. (In-vitro Swedish Study)
2nd: DETAILS - Pfizer Vaccine Becomes DNA in The Human Liver Cells Huh7. (In-vitro Swedish Study)
3rd: Your Questions About Pfizer Vaccine Becomes DNA in The Liver Cells Study

In the third video, if I understand it correctly, Dr. Been posits that when the immune system detects the foreign integrated spike DNA, repair enzymes will either fix the cell, or a signal will be sent to the cell to kill it. Obviously as this study is in vitro, the immune system is not examined.

So, my questions: is this DNA integration only supposed to be temporary by design? Also, what is the long-term impact of spike-integrated DNA on CD4/CD8? We're not looking at a vax-AIDS pandemic in the future, are we, I mean, it just doesn't seem right to believe that. Still seems like there are too many unknowns here.

 

The study did not show the vaccine mRNA get integrated into the genomic DNA. It was just shown the mRNA got sequenced into DNA. Getting inserted into the genome of the cell is another step, which isn't easy.

Now, the vaccine mRNA should not be getting transcribed into DNA. However, the cell line this study used is far from what you call a healthy normal cell. Huh7 is human liver cancer cells. Its claim to fame is in allowing us to grow hepatitis C virus in lab, which meant the ability to better research cures and treatments for that disease.

Huh7 cells have 55 to 63 chromosomes. Humans have 46. The cells, like many cancer ones, already have wonky DNA. When it comes to seeing if an agent has an affect on a cells DNA coding system, Huh7 probably isn't the best candidate.

https://huh7.com/

 

My posting should have been more clear. I don't see evidence of wide spread modification of human DNA by either mRNA or SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. There is abundant evidence of lung, cardio, and brachial changes from the virus. There are a small number, <1%, of mRNA side-effects: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions | FDA. These are well documented and easily identified and treated.

Misinformation about COVID and treatments remains rampant and is often used by the unscrupulous to fleece the uneducated and foolish. PriusChat has our own collection of false posters ... mostly self-corralled into a pair of threads. Like shooting fish in a barrel, they are exceptionally easy to become the butt of jokes. Speaking of which, I'm impressed by sewage samples mapping COVID hot spots.

Bob Wilson

 

I appreciate the helpful Q&A, since we are all in this together and I myself am learning and trying to understand the implications. I would rather plead genuine ignorance and ask than do what I see some people doing on their websites, “worst fears confirmed…” doesn’t make sense. It does make me wonder though, why the USA has not readily adopted Novavax or Covaxin, since I believe these do not seem to sequence into DNA and instead use a more traditional approach to vaccination. I would imagine a more traditional approach than mRNA would have circumvented the “DNA” concerns and possibly a much lower frequency of reports to VAERS/Yellow Card.

Dr. Been commented in detail on the article itself and on other Qs in a live chat (3rd link). Nothing he said was about vax-AIDS, that was my own “What if” question.

 

839 days are gone,

since this fear was accepted as "my new normal" for some people.

 

Bob Wilson

 

There is no evidence of mRNA vaccines getting converted into DNA in normal cells. This is the first study to show it happening in cancer cells, which do not have normal DNA mechanics to begin with, or they wouldn't be cancer cells.

The US does have a traditional vaccine for COVID available. It is J&J's. It had an elevated risk of blood clots in women, which lead to it being briefly pulled from the market. So the traditional vaccine has a less safe record than the mRNA ones.

 

mRNA vaccine could be designed to transcribe to DNA, if they also code reverse transcriptase. Do they? Shrugs. That's what HIV uses....

REVVL V+ 5G ?