... from the same people who declare that the Universe is only about 6000 years old: "In the beginning about 6,000 years ago, Jesus Christ created the heavens and the earth out of nothing, or ex nihilo, ..." The Final World: Renovation or New Creation? | The Institute for Creation Research Creation Ex Nihilo Through Jesus Christ | The Institute for Creation Research https://www.icr.org/article/our-young-solar-system/ I.e. the Institute for Creation Research hasn't changed its primary message since the days of Henry Morris and Duane Gish. Sorry, but I haven't been able to believe anything they claim since reading a bunch of their materials in the late 1980s. Far too much of their "science" for which I have independent knowledge (mostly physics, astronomy, and cosmology) is seriously distorted, misstated, twisted out of context, and displaying many others sins.
When I was a grad student, there was a local guy who was a university employee—he worked in facilities maintenance, but being an employee was enough to be the "staff adviser" of a student creationist group, and about once a semester they would reserve a lecture room and he would give a public lecture using pretty much ICR talking points. (I hadn't heard of ICR before, but discovered them as I traced his talking points back.) Mostly undergrads would attend, but there would usually be some curious grad students in the back of the room, and I remember some entertaining moments, like when he used a talking point about something biological science was still nowhere near figuring out, and some bio grad student in back raised his or her hand and said "we have an undergrad bio class where we assign the students to do that in one of their labs, which I grade, and most of them do just fine".
No meaningful health impacts from exposure to wind turbines: No meaningful health impacts from exposure to wind turbines | EurekAlert!
We have discussed birds before. Urban window crashes and feral cats are largest causes. Wind turbines and power distribution systems are a bit lower. The Eurekalert link above was not about birds.
Supersonic flight research: Japan completes Mach 5 hypersonic engine test for 2-hour Pacific travel They aim at commercial flights, but I doubt that would be first application.
The Ocean Observatories Initiative, a deep-ocean observation system, is being dismantled, with more than 900 deployed instruments being pulled up this month. This system has been continuously collecting real-time science data for more than a decade, and had been intended to run another 10-15 years, but doesn't fit into this Administration's "strategy". https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/trump-administration-to-dismantle-ocean-monitoring-system/ "(NYT) The Trump administration is dismantling a $368 million deep-ocean observation system that was put in place a decade ago to monitor coastal environments, marine ecosystems and powerful currents that affect the global climate. The National Science Foundation said it would send ships in June to begin removing more than 900 deep-sea instruments anchored off Oregon, Washington state, Alaska, North Carolina, and an area between Greenland and Iceland known as the Irminger Sea. Scientists have used data from the system to understand how the ocean is absorbing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, how changes in ocean temperature such as marine heat waves might affect fisheries or signal bigger shifts in the climate, and coastal flooding along the East Coast. ..." The EU is expanding their own system, but that won't help the people who were using the U.S.-zone data for monitoring fisheries. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/eu-invests-in-ocean-monitoring-as-us-cuts-funding/ "BRUSSELS (AP) — With underwater drones and ocean-focused satellites, the EU is expanding its monitoring network of Earth’s seas as climate change fuels heat waves and stronger storms and the Trump administration plans severe cuts to a similar system in the United States. With an investment package of 92 million euros ($107 million) called OceanEye announced on Wednesday, the EU will be able to take the helm of global efforts to explore the depths of the planet’s vast oceans, said Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission. ..." P.S. See also: Trump administration takes aim at crucial ocean monitoring network | Scientific American Trump administration takes aim at crucial ocean monitoring network The Ocean Observatories Initiative has been collecting data on physical, chemical, geological and biological conditions in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans for the past decade
Call it the version 1 system. Use the operational experience to replace it with a better one. Yes, I regret the short term data loss but we’re dealing with vandals from the dark ages: Bob Wilson
In (journal) Science 2026 May 28, more gloom on Trump vs. Science was presented: https://www.science.org/content/article/white-house-seeks-tighten-political-oversight-grantmaking Presenting some new things. Old includes that new funding proposals mentioning “diversity” are disfavored, even though biodiversity research is not what Trump Inc. would seem to want deleted from US science. Quoting therefrom “The proposed regulation would also give additional legal weight to several Trump executive orders last year that banned research to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion in science on the grounds that it favored certain groups and slighted others. It says tighter oversight by political appointees is needed to prevent research agencies from “promot[ing] a woke policy agenda that did not reflect the values of the vast majority of the American public.” Trump has directed federal agencies to ban such research and ensure that all funded projects are “aligned with the administration’s priorities.” Ginexi and other critics say that approach distorts a process that is supposed to reward the best scientific ideas.” Quoted because US Exec Branch has not before to my knowledge required ‘alignment’ with an Administration’s priorities. Scientific research is not only apolitical, it transcends politics. It purely seeks better understanding of how things are. It does require money, but happily, much less than Defense however that might be defined. -- For any gloom this might invoke, let me say I expect that US science funding will recover soon, and US science dominance will not be surrendered to China or Euro.
I often bemoan the short time between the dark ages and today's vandals. Except they have yet to achieve (and beyond me how) a species wide vandalism. The age of enlightenment rose inspite of the Dark Ages even though it has been (and remains) a struggle. Fortunately, there are other countries that have some insulation if nothing else, the language barrier. For example, Trump and few of his minions do not speak French, Japanese, or Latin which I have studied (not mastered but enough.) So if deniers wish to post something that eliminate any doubt of their folly, cite the facts and data and move on. If they persist, use the "squelch" and move one. Proverbs has a lot of good advice for dealing with a "fool." Bob Wilson
I would paint Priuschat contributors differently. We have here computer programmers, medical professionals, A&P mechanics, scientists, and others only bound by Toyota's experiment. None of us knows everything, but there is always a chance to learn something new. If only we look. If we call each other dumbasses, we are not looking.
You speak the truth regarding how we are bound together. It might be summed up as a type of search for excellence. Nobody wants to realize their oncologist, or attorney or brain surgeon, or Pilot was given preference (over skill/knowledge/performance) because of their religion - or gender or sexual preference or cultural beliefs, or ethnicity or politics or nationality etc. Using any or combinations thereof - your provider may very well in fact be number 50 or 100 (or worse) on the 'qualifying skills scale' The persons standing to take a bow at the Metropolitan Opera - or on top of the Olympic platform, even 2nd & 3rd place, got there because they are the crème de la crème .....
Learning something new is good. However, not everyone always comes to the same conclusions. It's perfectly normal for people disagree in life. That said...dumbass can be spelled many different ways. So, don't dish it out if you can't take it.