1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

GM moves nearly 2,000 hybrids in September

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by cwerdna, Oct 4, 2008.

  1. JSH

    JSH Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    2,605
    140
    0
    Location:
    PDX
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    This merger actually makes quite a bit of sense. Cerberus owns 51% of GMAC, GM owns the rest. GM swaps GMAC for Chrysler. GM sells Jeep and the Dodge Ram to Renault/Nissan. GM keeps the minivan. (Chrysler minivans lead the market and make up 40% of total minivan sales while GM eliminated their minivan to concentrate on SUV's) It also shuts down a competitor. A merger may also allow GM to renegotiate terms with their dealer network and consolidate from separate dealerships to combined "GM" dealerships.

    It makes absolutely no sense if the government gets involved a makes the combined company keep 30K employees that aren't needed.
     
  2. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    "Somewhere in Flyover Country"
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    the only thing that makes any sense for GM in all of this is if they get all of GMAC back or sell it all and can start another captive. GMAC is worse than a normal bank right now.
     
  3. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Its unclear to me whether the two-mode is just inherently less efficient, or because its so complicated and expensive they have to cut corners everywhere else reducing overall efficiency. Either way I'm not very impressed with the 2-mode Vue.

    Vehicle --------------- Pas Vol ----- Cargo Vol --- Total Vol
    2009 Saturn Vue Hybrid -- 97.7 --------- 29.2 ------- 126.9
    2009 Saturn Vue ---------
    97.7 --------- 29.2 ------- 126.9
    2009 Toyota RAV4 ------- 108.2 --------- 36.4 ------- 144.6
    2009 Honda CRV --------- 103.8 --------- 35.7 ------- 139.5
    2009 Toyota HiHy 4WD --- 145.4 --------- 10.3 ------- 155.7
    2009 Ford Escape Hyb ---- 99.5 --------- 27.8 ------- 127.3

    Vehicle --------------- EPA Comb -- Annual Fuel -- Annual Cost
    2009 Saturn Vue Hybrid --- 28 --------- 536 ------- $1608
    2009 Saturn Vue ---------
    - 22 --------- 681 ------- $2043
    2009 Toyota RAV4 --------- 24 --------- 625 ------- $1875
    2009 Honda CRV ----------- 23 --------- 652 ------- $1957
    2009 Toyota HiHy 4WD ----- 26 --------- 577 ------- $1731
    2009 Ford Escape Hyb ----- 32 --------- 469 ------- $1407

    * Assumed 15,000 miles per year @$3 per gallon.

    Vehicle --------------- Curb Weight ---- GVWR ---- Max Payload
    2009 Saturn Vue Hybrid -- 4265 --------- 4900 ------- 635
    2009 Saturn Vue ---------
    3825 --------- 4825 ------- 1000
    2009 Toyota RAV4 -------- 3300 --------- 4730 ------- 1430
    2009 Honda CRV ---------- 3389 --------- 4560 ------- 1171
    2009 Toyota HiHy 4WD ---- 4508 --------- 5935 ------- 1427
    2009 Ford Escape Hyb ---- 3669 --------- 4720 ------- 1051


    Vehicle ------------------ HP ----- Weight/HP -- Torque
    2009 Saturn Vue Hybrid - 172@6500 ---- 24.8 --- 167@4500
    2009 Saturn Vue --------
    169@6200 ---- 22.6 --- 161@5100
    2009 Toyota RAV4 ------- 179@6000 ---- 18.4 --- 172@4000
    2009 Honda CRV --------- 166@5800 ---- 20.4 --- 161@4200
    2009 Toyota HiHy 4WD --- 209@5600 ---- 20.5 --- 212@3600
    2009 Ford Escape Hyb --- 153@6000 ---- 24.0 --- 136@4500


    Vehicle ----------------- MSRP ---- CR Reliability -- CR Owner Satisfaction
    2009 Saturn Vue Hybrid - $27,930 --------- NA ------------- NA
    2009 Saturn Vue --------
    $23,050 --- worse than av -------- 57
    2009 Toyota RAV4 ------- $21,500 - much better than av ---- 73
    2009 Honda CRV --------- $21,095 - much better than av ---- 76
    2009 Toyota HiHy 4WD --- $34,700 - much better than av ---- 76
    2009 Ford Escape Hyb --- $29,305 --- better than av ------- 73

    Compared to the RAV4 and CRV, the regular VUE appears to be smaller, heavier, more under powered, less fuel efficient, less reliable, less popular with its owners and more expensive. The hybrid model makes it the most fuel efficient, but adds almost $5k to the cost. It saves ~$270 per year over the RAV4, but costs ~$6500 more and is still smaller, heavier, and slower. It also loses a lot of payload capacity, 635 pounds is pretty anemic. With 4, 175 pound adults and no cargo you will be over GVWR. The Ford Escape Hybrid is a little more expensive ($1375) than the Vue Hybrid, but for a similar size its lighter, less underpowered, more reliable, has more payload capacity and is much more popular with its owners as well as much more fuel efficient.

    Rob
     
  4. spwolf

    spwolf Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    3,156
    440
    0
    Location:
    Eastern Europe
    I have tested Opel version of Saturn Vue, and it is by far the worst small SUV on the market... It is Daewoo product and that can be seen and felt everywhere. Not even german media likes it...
     
  5. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Thats very interesting, I didn't know that. I knew the Aveo was a Daewoo, but didn't realize the Vue was as well. Wiki just shows it as a rebadged Opel, which I assumed was Euro GM designed. You have to go to the Opel Antara's page to see that its designed by Daewoo. Figures. I wonder how many of the people who buy the Vue despite all its shortcomings and higher price because they want to buy American know that its designed in Korea and made in Mexico?

    Opel Antara - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Saturn Vue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Rob
     
  6. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,865
    8,168
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
  7. zenMachine

    zenMachine Just another Onionhead

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    3,355
    300
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Why Ford Needs The GM-Chrysler Deal Done - Forbes.com

    In the talks between General Motors and Chrysler, no one has more at stake than Ford Motor...

    ...Now Ford Credit is a key to Ford Motor's survival. Unlike GM, which sold a 51% interest in GMAC to Cerberus in 2006, Ford steadfastly refused to sell its finance company, which it considers a strategic asset.
    An automaker's finance arm is more than just a bank that lends money to consumers and dealers, says Andrew Shapiro, managing partner at Casesa Shapiro Group. "At the end of the day, it's a marketing tool" that can be used to help manage inventory, he says.
    GM lost that opportunity when it ceded control of GMAC to Cerberus. It paid the price recently when Cerberus--likely seeking to pressure GM into a deal for Chrysler--announced GMAC would no longer provide loans to consumers with credit scores below 700. That choked off sales at GM dealerships, forcing the automaker to spend precious millions on a national advertising campaign to reassure consumers that credit was still available (through other lenders) for GM vehicles.
    The moral of this story is don't lose control of your captive finance company. When sales of a certain model turn soft, for instance, Ford can turn to Ford Credit for subsidized incentives to woo buyers and make way for better-selling models.