1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

PETITION! - WHY no available moonroof with Advanced Tech package? LISTEN UP TOYOTA!

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Main Forum' started by mbucklein, May 14, 2009.

  1. mbucklein

    mbucklein Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    14
    10
    7
    Location:
    South Orange County
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Toyota made some very bad choices when they planned the option packages for the 2010 Prius release. Please reply to this if you agree with me. I am strongly considering cancelling my pre-order because I really can't get the car I thought I would be able to get. The idea of levels I, II, III, IV, and V is great for the more frugal buyer, but that's about where the greatness ends.

    I'm really disappointed that an excuse as lame as a "weight/engineering challenge" is the reason you cannot get a Prius V package with Advanced Technology and a solar moonroof. Isn't a solar roof advanced technology? If anything, a solar roof should be part of that package level! That the weight played into the equation makes absolutely no sense - how much weight can the sensors for the LKA, IPA, or Dynamic Cruse Control REALLY take up? And LED lights with fogs? That's standard car equipment - how on earth does that raise the weight beyond an acceptable measure? Further - weight aside - what kind of "engineering challenges" are encountered placing sensors and light bulbs that are nowhere near the moonroof? Let's get real here - entire cars are engineering challenges. They are amazing machines. Yet Toyota can't figure out how to put LED bulbs in when there's a sunroof on the top of the car? Hard to believe. Hard to stomach.

    I don't like to sound cynical or be cynical, but this all reeks of a car that has either been released too early, or a car that is planned for re-release with better options as a profit strategy on Toyota's part. Am I alone on this? It makes me wonder if the first wave of releases may even be recalled if the former is true. If it is the latter, I would sooner never purchase from Toyota again.

    I don't know if any other hopeful third generation Prius owners are as disappointed as I am about this. I even noticed that you can no longer get a black Prius with a tan interior, according to the 2010 Prius website. Black with tan has been a popular choice for a lot of buyers, and it doesn't make any sense to me why Toyota would do away with that kind of exterior/interior color motif.





    Hey Toyota... if you're wondering why you might be seeing sales drop, here's why.
     
    2 people like this.
  2. dawtips

    dawtips New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    9
    0
    0
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    I'm the kind of person who will buy the best of the best if it is available. If the moon roof was available for an additional cost, I would buy it.
     
  3. Lafferty

    Lafferty Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    163
    67
    0
    Location:
    Pacific Palisades
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    PETITION! - Please don't use that font ever again. :)
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,854
    8,158
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    What's up with the giant letters?

    :p sorry ... I had to be funny.
    oh! and welcome to PC. Toyota certainly knows their own markets, and what they'll bear. I know there's always exceptions. For example, they don't sell a baby poo yellow green Prius. So if you want one, you have to do it yourself:


    [​IMG]

    But Toyota knows roughly how many they'd sell. Similarly, if you over 'gizo' a car, it'll cost a ton more. so you have to do it your self. Let us know how that goes for you when you get it done.
     
  5. greylar

    greylar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    283
    38
    0
    Location:
    Montana
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Hill that car is awesome! It makes me laugh every time I see it. Have you seen it yet this year? G
     
  6. accordingly

    accordingly Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    268
    63
    0
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    I do agree, not offering a true 'fully loaded' model was a bad business decision. It's obvious Toyota realizes this car attracts a lot of people who usually shop for a luxury car, and that's great. Let's face it, the advanced tech package would not be considered for a second by anyone shopping for a $22,000 car if it were available on the base model. It costs 20% of what the car does for things that are of questionable utility but unquestionable coolness. Those interested in keeping pace with the luxury barges like the A8 and S class are not as concerned with price.
    These people expect a roof in their cars as much as they expect leather seats. It's not going to go over too well at the country club that Toyota makes you choose between the moonroof and the radar cruise control. I'd stick with my German car and not compromise. Somebody will make a true luxury hybrid that is popular soon enough.
    I also agree the 'engineering' excuse does not make sense at all. You're already forcing people to compromise efficiency with the 17" wheels (which look way way better than the 15s incidentally) and like I said, those shopping the 'fully loaded' prius are not going to care they spend $20 more a year on gas because they lose out on 2 mpg. If the car can't handle 100 extra pounds safely as built, that's a pretty serious issue. Should I not buy this car if I have overweight relatives that may ride in it?
     
  7. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,854
    8,158
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    I try not to go that rout ... in fear that I may :D
     
  8. bedrock8x

    bedrock8x Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    1,483
    137
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    The weight issue is not as simple as you think.
    I believe the added wieght of the solar moonroof will cause the 10 Prius exceeded the weight classification to be classified as a different weight class. That means for the EPA mileage test, more dynamic drag will be added resulting a lower EPA FE rating. I think Toyota does not want to have two mileage ratings for the Prius or the EPA would not allow this.
     
  9. dogfriend

    dogfriend Human - Animal Hybrid

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    7,512
    1,185
    0
    Location:
    Carmichael, CA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    What about the signal mirrors? Why no signal mirrors? Toyota owes us some signal mirrors! :madgrin:
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. mbucklein

    mbucklein Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    14
    10
    7
    Location:
    South Orange County
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Sorry.. it was my first post and I didn't think a font size of "2" would show up. I fixed it.
     
  11. Midpack

    Midpack Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    461
    43
    0
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    It's inevitable (and they know it) that some will disagree with their choices no matter what, but I suspect the marketing/sales/financial wizards at Toyota are incredibly skilled at pricing their cars and bundling options to optimize volume, $ sales and profitability over the life of the vehicle build (they may withhold some combinations for later years as mentioned above). I want a sunroof without the solar package or nav, but I don't see a need to shout about it (large font). I will either pony up $3600 (unlikely) or just buy a plain IV - the world will still spin on it's axis either way.
     
  12. mbucklein

    mbucklein Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    14
    10
    7
    Location:
    South Orange County
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Such a good point!!!

     
  13. mirak

    mirak New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    127
    13
    0
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    So, can I reply if I disagree? Look: Toyota says there are some engineering constraints. Maybe there are. More likely, I think Toyota decided it couldn't produce and sell a $35k Prius in economically viable numbers.

    Don't worry. If money is no option, I'm sure you'll be able to get you solar sunroof or AT added eventually. I bet someone will offer it after-market eventually.
     
  14. Politburo

    Politburo Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    971
    208
    0
    Vehicle:
    2009 Prius
    I don't know about the 2010, but the Gen2 has a recommended load limit of 810 lbs. This is not a secret.. it's all on the door jamb label. Make your decision accordingly.
     
  15. accordingly

    accordingly Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    268
    63
    0
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Engineering impossibility. Either that or signal mirrors are so last century.

    It that with or without fog lights and navigation installed? What if I have XM radio and the heavy rubber floormats?




    I think it is important for consumers to know what exactly the engineering issue is that prevents a moonroof from being installed on a car with more high tech electronics than normal. Is it somehow unsafe for Larry the car audio guy to solve this engineering problem in a few hours for $1000?
     
  16. a priori

    a priori Canonus Curiosus

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    3,083
    407
    23
    Location:
    Chicagoland (West)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Here are the two reasons that make the most sense to me. The first one is completely understandable and reasonable. The second one I can understand, but it doesn't have quite the "weight" as the former.

    Reason #1:
    Reason #2:
     
  17. eglmainz

    eglmainz New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    887
    141
    0
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V

    This is not even a technological issue, as this configuration is allowed in Europe. I would imagine the extra weight could have prevented the car from getting the 50 mpg rating with the 17" wheels, and the solar roof.

    Bottom line is that it will not be available in the US with this configuration for the 2010 model year. With enough perceived demand to offset the engineering costs that may need to be overcome for the US market, Toyota may reconsider this for a later model year.
     
  18. Steve Cebu

    Steve Cebu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    523
    59
    0
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I think this is a tempest in a teacup. Yes, Toyota does not offer a fully loaded Prius, at this moment, on it's initial release date. I seriously doubt they will keep it that way. I'm sure as they see demand for a fully loaded model grow they will provide it. But with 2009's cluttering up the lots and the economy is still at the bottom, the economic sense of a fully loaded Prius at launch makes no sense.
    Give Toyota 6 months and then see what they offer. My best guess is they will "Find" some way to produce a car with all the gadgets and price it accordingly.
     
  19. Tideland Prius

    Tideland Prius Moderator of the North
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    44,901
    16,127
    41
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    A little late to the party, eh? We've been through this many times (even though the packages have only been out for a month or two).


    The issue isn't LED vs. Moonroof (and for whatever reason, people keep thinking it is). It's 17" alloy vs. moonroof. There are countries that will get LEDs and the SPM but with 15" alloys.


    So can we please set the record straight. It's the weight of the 17" ALLOYS vs. the Moonroof. Those will weigh more than a couple of extra wires, computer chips and a radar and a camera (ok I'm simplifying but you get the idea).
     
  20. V8Cobrakid

    V8Cobrakid Green Handyman

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2004
    3,790
    152
    0
    Location:
    Park View, Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    .. i don't get it.. how come a guy with only 9 post is trying to make a petition on something he odviously knows nothing about?....

    it's a weight issue... everyone can argue this as much as they want.. you have to have allocated passenger weight carrying capacity.. adding in extra computers makes it a 4 person car instead of 5 with luggage... add more things and it turns into a car with the weight limit of 3 people... so forth.. so on... unless you want to pay more for a beefed up suspension that is re engineered to hold more weight comfortably... but everyone wants to save money.. and this is how they're doing it for now.

    it isn't like toyota doesn't listen. in 04 there were all kinds of complains that they all modified by 06... so.. petition... not necessary.. just add to the forums that are already here and working just fine. btw.. toyota knows.. they've known since the release that it's a "problem".. mainly because a lot of employees want things mixed up too..

    i would say you can't have your cake and eat it too... but it's a prius.. you've had your cake.. stop taking second. :cool: