Similar to what I saw on TopGear

CrAz3D · Jul 1, 2009

Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the dead zones around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles.

The plant is the source of all the nickel found in a Prius battery and Toyota purchases 1,000 tons annually. Dubbed the Superstack, the plague-factory has spread sulfur dioxide across northern Ontario, becoming every environmentalist's nightmare.

The acid rain around Sudbury was so bad it destroyed all the plants and the soil slid down off the hillside, said Canadian Greenpeace energy-coordinator David Martin during an interview with Mail, a British-based newspaper.

All of this would be bad enough in and of itself; however, the journey to make a hybrid doesn't end there. The nickel produced by this disastrous plant is shipped via massive container ship to the largest nickel refinery in Europe. From there, the nickel hops over to China to produce nickel foam. From there, it goes to Japan. Finally, the completed batteries are shipped to the United States, finalizing the around-the-world trip required to produce a single Prius battery. Are these not sounding less and less like environmentally sound cars and more like a farce?

Wait, I haven't even got to the best part yet.

When you pool together all the combined energy it takes to drive and build a Toyota Prius, the flagship car of energy fanatics, it takes almost 50 percent more energy than a Hummer - the Prius's arch nemesis.

Through a study by CNW Marketing called Dust to Dust, the total combined energy is taken from all the electrical, fuel, transportation, materials (metal, plastic, etc) and hundreds of other factors over the expected lifetime of a vehicle. The Prius costs an average of $3.25 per mile driven over a lifetime of 100,000 miles - the expected lifespan of the Hybrid.

The Hummer, on the other hand, costs a more fiscal $1.95 per mile to put on the road over an expected lifetime of 300,000 miles. That means the Hummer will last three times longer than a Prius and use less combined energy doing it.

So, if you are really an environmentalist - ditch the Prius. Instead, buy one of the most economical cars available - a Toyota Scion xB. The Scion only costs a paltry $0.48 per mile to put on the road. If you are still obsessed over gas mileage - buy a Chevy Aveo and fix that lead foot. One last fun fact for you: it takes five years to offset the premium price of a Prius. Meaning, you have to wait 60 months to save any money over a non-hybrid car because of lower gas expenses.
Click to expand...

I've looked at a Prius, but after reading stuff like that, I cant imagine why I'd ever buy one. Thoughts?

efusco · Jul 1, 2009

CrAz3D said: ↑

I've looked at a Prius, but after reading stuff like that, I cant imagine why I'd ever buy one. Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Yea, this is 5 year old debunked "News".
You oughta consider a little more in depth research.
http://priuschat.com/forums/gen-ii-prius-main-forum/26050-prius-myths-their-rebuttals.html

efusco · Jul 1, 2009

Oh, other thoughts are that you're probably a troll, so I'm locking the thread.

Similar to what I saw on TopGear

CrAz3D New Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member

About PriusChat

Quick Navigation

Like us on Facebook

Buy us a beer!

Useful Searches

Similar to what I saw on TopGear

CrAz3D New Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus Staff Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus Staff Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member

efusco Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member