1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Calculated MPG vs. Indicated MPG of the c - Please post your results

Discussion in 'Prius c Fuel Economy' started by F8L, Mar 11, 2012.

  1. Ashley7

    Ashley7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    545
    222
    0
    Location:
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2019 Prius
    Model:
    XLE
    Forgive me if this was discussed earlier in this thread (or a million times elsewhere in these forums), but...

    People keep talking about using the calculated mpg to gauge how "accurate" the display is, or talking about how the display is "off" by however much. Isn't it more likely that the display is much more accurate than our calculations? I haven't looked into what technology is used to calculate the displayed mileage, but I imagine the car has a way of knowing how much gas was actually used. Whereas when we calculate it ourselves, there are so many variables that could cause it to be inaccurate. The hand calculations seem like a good, close estimate, particularly if the car doesn't calculate it for you. But I just can't believe that the car doesn't have a more accurate way of measuring mileage than our basic math. This would also explain why the difference between display and calculation isn't always the same.

    However, I'm willing to be proven wrong, if there's a reason we doubt the accuracy of the displayed mileage.
     
  2. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    No, so long as you use a couple tank weighted average and fill the tank up to 'full' (first off-click) each time.
    The odometer is well within 1% accuracy, probably 99.5% accurate
    The fuel station pump has 3 sig digits, implying a 1/10,000 accuracy (99.99%) for a 10 gallon fillup.

    I don't know about the Prius 'c', but the G3 Prius meter is ~ 4 - 5% optimistic.
     
  3. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    This has been the general consensus. I have seen as much as a 5.7% error but I usually wait until the second click which can add even more error.
     
  4. Ashley7

    Ashley7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    545
    222
    0
    Location:
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2019 Prius
    Model:
    XLE
    But don't pumps vary with regards to when exactly they click off? So even if you stop at the click each time, you might get more or less gas each time you fill? Or is this negligible? I did come across another thread where the consensus seemed to be that the display is more accurate for a single tank, but the calculation is more accurate long-term. Mine haven't been that far different, so it isn't all that important...just curious :)
     
  5. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Yep; that is why advice is given to combine a few consecutive tanks together. In effect this makes a BIG tank, and only one click to off variation for imprecision.

    Have a look at ~ 4000 miles of consecutive fill-ups in my CTh. Average calculated to meter inaccuracy is 4.7%, while individual tanks vary from ~ 3.7 - 5.7% off. If you take any four consecutive tanks, you get quite close to the expected 4.7%.

    Put another way: Keep track of ~ 40 gallons of fuel before you calculate, and your accuracy will be excellent. Start with a 'full' * tank, and end with a full* tank. The addition amounts in between do not have to be to 'full', just keep track of the amount.

    * 'full' -- meaning first click to off.
     
  6. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Whatever Works

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    1,430
    277
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Using pure gas (no ethanol), I've achieved my best tank yet in spite of triple digit heat and a rather liberal use of the A/C as a result:

    Date: 6-26-12
    Miles driven: 600.1
    Gallons Pumped: 9.52
    Hand-Calculated MPG: 63.0
    Displayed MPG: 63.4
    Average Speed: 27
    Tire Size / Wheel size: 15
    Tire Brand / Model: stock
    Tire PSI (Front / Back): 42/40
    Seasonal Conditions: Dry and hot, A/C usage as already stated

    The cost premium of ethanol-free fuel is not worth the increase in mileage (though it might have been even greater if not for the arid heat wave). This is my second 600-mile tank, and it looks like I had, at the very least, half a GALLON in the tank remaining. This time, displayed versus calculated were very close. I am not using the same pump on any fillups, and I am overfilling it only once on each fillup (i.e. stopping after the second pump release). Yes, a rather low average speed, but there was minimal highway driving, so it worked in my favor.
     
  7. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Vinnie, I'm not sure about your half a tank guess. At 62mpg I put 554 miles and filled up with 8.96ga. I was showing 1 bar left. Given the c has a smaller gas tank I don't see how you could have had even close to half a tank left. I even had a 60.7mpg tank that went 598miles on a flashing bar. That fill up was 9.8ga. all numbers above are calculated.

    Regardless those are awesome numbers so congrats!
     
    vinnie97 likes this.
  8. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Whatever Works

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    1,430
    277
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    erm, I meant half a gallon. ;)

    & thanks.
     
  9. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    LOL good call.

    I,m thoroughly impressed with your numbers and the c in general.

    I need a few of you to verify the accuracy of the c speedo with GPS. Is it off by 1.5-2mph like the GenII and III? It appears the indicated mpg is more accurate than the Previous models as well. If the speedo is accurate than that means the c is much more efficient overall since us Prius folk are driving 2mph slower than we think we are. ;)
     
  10. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Whatever Works

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    1,430
    277
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Yea, but your numbers still look better than mine, if only just. :D

    I don't have a GPS installed at the moment on my C2 (I had assumed the display was also 2 mph faster than actual). If they have finally released a dash kit (so I can properly install my JVC head unit), I can jump on that opportunity to verify.
     
  11. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Can you just use your smart phone? I use GPSTest app. When the accuracy is down to at least 15' I start measuring.
     
  12. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Whatever Works

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    1,430
    277
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    lol, well, would you laugh if I said I don't own one? I am going eco(nomical) in that dept as well by owning a cheapie pay-as-you-go phone. In the meantime, someone else could surely fill in.
     
  13. F8L

    F8L Protecting Habitat & AG Lands

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    19,011
    4,081
    50
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA.
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I wouldn't laugh. If you can get by without one then more power to ya. They are expensive as hell to own. :(
     
  14. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    I use a motorola RAZR. I'm not sure how old it is because I bought it used :)

    Since it is for the most part used for short conversations at work, I buy per minute plans through the Verizon MVNO called pageplus at 4 cents a minute. I end up paying about $5/month.
     
  15. dlgilles

    dlgilles New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    2
    0
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Does the Prius save and calculate "total mpg" over time, or does the trip mpg get deleted everytime we turn the car off? Seems like a cummulative mpg would be easy to calculate and store?
     
  16. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Whatever Works

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    1,430
    277
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    Very frugal, Sage. Our govt. (both parties) would be wise to achieve similar frugality. Won't hold my breath, though.

    Digilles, the only cumulative mpg it stores is via the trip function. I have left trip A untouched since shortly after purchase to get a near lifetime MPG reading to see how it stacks up against the calculations.

    After 2808 miles, it claims an MPG of 63.5 mpg.

    After calculating for 2866 miles, Fuelly shows the actual is 61.0.

    This amounts to a 4% difference between displayed and calculated favoring the former, not accounting for the first 58 miles unaccounted for by trip A. If anything, they would likely bring the average down since the first fillup yielded the poorest mpg (59.6) of all so far.
     
  17. eldersciii

    eldersciii C3PO

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    32
    1
    0
    Location:
    Sacramento
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius c
    Model:
    Three
    I just filled up for the very first time. 47.4mpg on fuelly vs. 46.7 by the car. We are just leaning how to "glide" and all these Prii terms but we also used the A/c the whole time as its 90* + here in NorCal. And on the trip home have 2, 1 mile long hills at a 8% grade. I live in a very hilly area though. We did drive across town to Roseville ca, about 40 min from my home and we averaged 68.7mpg for that trip. 53 mpg on the way back. Our trip to SF and back got us 50.3 with the a/c on the whole way doing 65 to 70 and 1 hour of rush hour SF traffic. No ac needed in SF. It was a wonderful 60* on the coast.
     
  18. SquallLHeart

    SquallLHeart The Techie Guy

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    826
    247
    5
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    before a stupid tech accidentally reset BOTH my trip meters for my last maintenance..

    i had my trip B reading about 59mpg for the 10022 miles i had on it..
    manually calculating over that time... hmm about 58 mpg.

    where as most people think the vehicle's numbers are slightly optimistic... (typically from tank to tank)... after seeing how close those numbers were.... you know... i think the car knows what it's doing for the most part.. lol.
     
  19. Ashley7

    Ashley7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    545
    222
    0
    Location:
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2019 Prius
    Model:
    XLE
    Do you know what the techs are doing that leads to them resetting the trip meters? Is there some sort of info they get from the display screen? And then they hit(/hold) the wrong buttons? Just curious.
     
  20. SquallLHeart

    SquallLHeart The Techie Guy

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    826
    247
    5
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius c
    Model:
    Two
    the process of reseting the maintenance data requires you to push the trip meter 3 times and hold it the third time... it's a timing thing when you first start up the car... it's explained in the owner's manual.

    he messed up.... obviously more than once..