1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Toyota & Ford end hybrid truck effort

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by Jeff N, Jul 23, 2013.

  1. Jeff N

    Jeff N The answer is 0042

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    2,382
    1,304
    0
    Location:
    California, USA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Chevy Volt
    cwerdna likes this.
  2. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    That's too bad.
    Ford Splits With Toyota, Plans Own Truck Hybrid System - Bloomberg


    It sounds like they did not work and play well together, which is sad. We could have used a good hybrid rwd and 4wd system before the end of the decade.
     
  3. dipper

    dipper Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    1,242
    252
    0
    Like our resident GM hater... "A little bit too late... for Toyota." More hype than results outside their Prius.
     
    fotomoto likes this.
  4. Jeff N

    Jeff N The answer is 0042

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    2,382
    1,304
    0
    Location:
    California, USA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Chevy Volt
    What's technically wrong with GM's two-mode hybrid system in a pickup truck? I think GM wasn't willing to sell them at a loss in small volumes and truck customers just don't want hybrids. Any not aware of any technical flaw in GM's system that is substantially responsible for the sales failure.
     
  5. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A

    What bmw said, and they were one of the partners, that it was too expensive. I would say the hybrid system in toyota's 4wd Lexus LSh, also appears too expensive, or at least Lexus is pricing it as such. It was hoped that toyota and ford would come up with something that cost less than 2-mode and at the same time saved more gas.
     
  6. Jeff N

    Jeff N The answer is 0042

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    2,382
    1,304
    0
    Location:
    California, USA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Chevy Volt
    I'm not sure why it should inherently be more than a few hundred above the cost of a Volt transmission. It shares about 3/4 of the parts and the transmission casing and basically just adds another planetary gearset but supports added towing capacity and fixed gears for more efficient highway hauling (at least in theory).

    GM paired it with a large V8 engine but still got ~30% efficiency improvement from it even though it was a performance-oriented hybrid. I wonder how much better mpg they might have done by pairing it with a smaller V6?

    I agree that two-mode is overly complex and expensive for ordinary passenger cars. I think GM should bring out a full-hybrid clutch-less one-mode (prius-like) transmission for that market. I *think* that is something that john1701a and I agree on but he's never specifically confirmed it.
     
  7. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A

    From an efficiency/power point of view a turbo -6 would definitely be better.
    Compare Side-by-Side
    EPA says you save about $2000 in 5 years on the chevy hybrid versus the ford turbo 6. If you can sell it for $6000 more you might get some market share, but GM did not come close to offering it at that price. You had to buy it with certain options and starting at a much higher price.

    2009 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra Hybrid - First Drive Review - Car Reviews - Car and Driver
    It sounds like its kept all the costs of the regular transmission then adds 2motor hsd, but for a higher torque application, and low volume. That is going to cost money as bmw said when it dropped the system.
     
  8. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney EditProfOptInfoCustomUser Title

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    2,287
    460
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Not necessarily. They're competitors. So they'd work together to do basic research until one or both of the companies reach a point where they think they can go it alone.
     
  9. LDPosse

    LDPosse Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    35
    27
    0
    Location:
    Hershey, PA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Well, this doesn't really hurt my feelings too much. I would love a reasonably priced hybrid pickup, but I don't want something built on a POS F*rd chassis.

    Now the GM Hybrid setup... They just need to put that in a 2500HD series pickup and I'll be considering a purchase.
     
  10. TheEnglishman

    TheEnglishman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    180
    57
    0
    Location:
    Southeastern United States
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Many, many truck drivers are the type of people who think:

    A. Hybrids are for big-government-loving-pot-smoking-hippies.
    B. Hybrid batteries die after 3 years and cost $10,000 to replace.
    C. Spending less than $100 to fill up a passenger vehicle is unnatural.

    Anyone remember the Ford Ranger EV's? They were sold only to fleets and their small weight helped the systems worked. Toyota/Ford must each start with compact pickups as they started with compact cars. Don't jump right into making a hybrid F-150 or Tundra -- that's just stupid.
     
    markabele likes this.
  11. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,146
    15,404
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    To me this reads like they decided to pursue different architectures. There is more than one way to make a hybrid pickup.

    Bob Wilson
     
    usbseawolf2000 and Scorpion like this.
  12. Scorpion

    Scorpion Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2013
    440
    162
    2
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    They will simply have to market them with some word other than "hybrid".
    I agree "hybrid" produces knee-jerk reaction in the truck crowd, but I'm not sure about (C).
    I'm pretty sure most truck drivers would love to see improved city mpg, with some sort of regen braking setup.

    Speaking of which........is Ford serious about putting "hydraulic hybrid system" into production?
     
  13. dipper

    dipper Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    1,242
    252
    0
    If KERS is used, would those truck drivers think it is some feminine products since they know only NASCAR and not F1?
     
  14. Scorpion

    Scorpion Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2013
    440
    162
    2
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    IV

    It is my understanding that when it comes to maximizing regen:
    - KERS is best for light vehicles capable of braking from a high speed (Porsche 911, F1 cars, etc.)
    - Hydraulic Hybrids are best suited for heavy vehicles braking at relatively lower speeds.....SUVs, trucks, etc.
    - Standard battery hybrids are good for all other class of vehicles, including the above two (though bit pricier)
     
  15. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    The tow rating is only 6000lbs. Yeah, only, when the base V6 can pull 5400 and the largest V8 can do 9100. Without being forced into a crew cab. The city mpg of the hybrid was great, but for those looking for a work truck, it wasn't enough to move them from a far cheaper ride that could actually do more work.

    The HSD has the same problem with towing. I know people have used their Prius for towing, but there is a reason Toyota doesn't rate it for towing. That reason could vary well be a CYA legal BS one, but it's there whatever it is, and it will keep the HSD out of a truck.
     
  16. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A

    The reason many of liked the joint venture is because developing this technology is risky and expensive. It is likely it will cost in the range of $2B, and both Toyota and Ford need the technology to meet the 2025 cafe standards. Ford and Toyota seemed like a good partnership to invest in this, with Toyota being the leader in hybrids, although not doing well with rwd hybrids, and ford being the leader in profitable full size pickup trucks. If they produced a good working system it would help ford reduce costs, and toyota to gain market share in the highly profitable truck market.

    Something must have gone wrong since the CEOs met in 2011 and decided to work on the problem together. Even with the partnership, Ford was free to experiment with hydraulics. Ford seems to be hiring a large number of new workers to work on hybrids, but they all still need to be trained. That is likely to further delay ford having hybrid trucks. I have no idea what toyota's timetable is now.
     
  17. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,676
    8,070
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    You may THINK it's too expensive, but I'm loosing track of all the HyHi's and RX hybrids around So Cal.
     
  18. seftonm

    seftonm Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    408
    78
    2
    Location:
    Winnipeg, MB
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Maybe it was hard to get the towing performance and so on that they needed. The Ram EcoDiesel can tow way more than the 2-mode trucks. It may be tough to get enough battery capacity to ensure good performance with a heavily loaded truck going up long grades. For city commuters who don't do much hauling with their trucks, the hybrid would probably work well.
     
  19. Scorpion

    Scorpion Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2013
    440
    162
    2
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Still not sure why no automaker has designed hybrid system to take advantage of massive low-end torque. It seems it is the limitations of the particular system (2-mode, HSD) rather than battery capacity.
    Would be interesting to know if Voltec scaled up with beefier motor would work well in a truck.
    Given that ICE efficiency of Volt is similar to Cruze, we could expect same performance in a truck: no gasoline for 1st x miles, with decent mpg thereafter.
    100% torque at 0 rpm should allow it to outperform any diesel as far as towing is concerned.
    Of course, in order for it to succeed in the marketplace, the word "hybrid" should not be found anywhere in the name.

    Perhaps noting the similarities to locomotives and submarines would help with the truck crowd....
     
  20. Jeff N

    Jeff N The answer is 0042

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    2,382
    1,304
    0
    Location:
    California, USA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Chevy Volt
    From all I can tell this is basically a marketing issue. The choice to limit hybrid sales to crew cabs obviously is not a transmission limitation...

    The tow rating on trucks is heavily dependent on their rear wheel axle reduction gear ratios. For example, with the same V8 engine and conventional transmission the GMC Sierra 1500 pickup has a maximum tow rating of 4,700 pounds with the 3.23 ratio axle and 7,200 pounds with the 3.73 ratio axle. The hybrid version of this truck comes with a larger engine and a 3.08 ratio axle and is rated for about 6,000 pounds towing.

    I'm guessing they could have marketed the hybrid version of the truck with a regular cab and with choices of higher alternative axle ratios for increased towing capability like they do for their conventional trims but for whatever reasons they chose to limit the hybrid to one trim and configuration. This was probably done, in part, due to the low volume sales of the vehicle.