1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Discrepancy in Average and Calculated MPG

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Fuel Economy' started by perry470, Oct 17, 2016.

  1. 05PreeUs

    05PreeUs Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2016
    1,097
    563
    0
    Location:
    MSP
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Speeo and odo errors certainly can be opposite, in the case of our Fusion (yuck), the odo is so close to actual it's not worth the effort to factor it for FE calculations. The analog Speedo reads almost exactly 1 MPH SLOWER than the digital dash indicated speed.
     
  2. dolj

    dolj Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    7,504
    3,771
    0
    Location:
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Speedo discrepancy is not so much error as deliberate misrepresentation brought on by legislation and liability mitigation.

    Also, it varies depending on the destination market. In the UK, for example, the error is typically 10% overstated between 20 and 80 mph. So if the speedo reads 77 mph, you're actually going 70 mph. This was the case with my UK Prius.
     
    fuzzy1 likes this.
  3. ozmatt

    ozmatt Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    571
    234
    0
    Location:
    australia
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    One
    2.80/galon ahh no way man! you guys suck lol :)
     
  4. 05PreeUs

    05PreeUs Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2016
    1,097
    563
    0
    Location:
    MSP
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Don't know where you get that idea from, may be true in the EU, but not here.
     
  5. perry470

    perry470 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2016
    13
    8
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Just did a fill-up today. Consumption screen said 55.6 MPG and calculation shows 54.6 MPG. Less than 2% discrepancy. Pretty happy with this. Though, I can't say the same when this car goes on an incline though. Took the car to San Francisco over the weekend and I got pretty bad fuel efficiency when going uphill.
     
  6. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,115
    10,044
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    He probably got that idea from a website called PriusChat, where it has been posted many times to many threads over the span of my membership.

    Three decades ago, I got the idea from a usenet group called rec.autos.*.
     
    dolj likes this.
  7. dolj

    dolj Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    7,504
    3,771
    0
    Location:
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Welcome to life in the hills.
     
  8. 09Prius2

    09Prius2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2016
    201
    88
    0
    Location:
    FL
    Vehicle:
    2009 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    I'd picked up on this probably 25 years ago when I had longtime subscriptions to car and driver magazine, motor trend etc. I don't remember which one, but in one version of the roadtest they would show the displayed speed vs actual at varied speeds. It was always 1mph under actual speed.
     
  9. Terrell

    Terrell Old-Timer

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    326
    169
    3
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I keep a spreadsheet, and find that the actual mileage calculated by dividing fuel into miles is about 6.5% LOWER than the MPG indicated on the screen. Here are some of my more recent readings:
    Screenshot 2016-10-25 22.24.56.png
     
    Mendel Leisk likes this.
  10. ozmatt

    ozmatt Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    571
    234
    0
    Location:
    australia
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    One
    hi just wanted to ad what I noticed this week

    filled car to full (until bowser clicked off just once)

    drove 200km exactly at highway speeds of 110kph very hilly terrain some hills were up to 10km long and moderate grade, my battery (reasonable condition not perfect but not dead either, excellent around the city) hovered around 1 bar for 50% of the trip, I wont use my prius on this route ever again I couldn't even keep up with the traffic on some hills, everyone flying past smiling at me :) small children sticking their finger up and poking tongue out, could almost hear their parents saying "look kids idiot in prius cant even get up the hill" anyway that's another story lol ....

    MFD displaying 5.5L/100 avg for the 200km trip

    stopped at same brand gas station as previous fill with same overhead line type fuel bowser, filled car to full again until bowser clicked off just once

    total fuel for re-fill was 12.0L

    that's a 1.0L discrepancy (if both gas pumps are calibrated and working similarly)
     
  11. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    54,703
    38,242
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    I make it 0.5 discrepancy?

    There's no reason to drive exactly 200 kms to do a calculation, btw. You need two values: distance (any distance will work) since last fill up, and volume of gas pumped when you fill up. Put those two values into a ratio equation with 100, and the fourth value is your liters per 100 km.

    As an example with your values:

    IMG_5769.jpg

    You're basically saying 200 is to 12 as 100 is to what. And the drill for determining "what", using your values for example, is: 12 times 100 divided by 200.

    You can do this with a spreadsheet to automate it, but by hand works fine too.

    Also, I wouldn't be concerned with discrepancies introduce by pump variations, they're relatively minor, and are pretty much cancelled out by even just two fill ups. Every subsequent fill up makes for more accuracy.
     
    #31 Mendel Leisk, Oct 29, 2016
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2016
  12. ozmatt

    ozmatt Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    571
    234
    0
    Location:
    australia
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    One
    Hi Mendel Leisk


    I didn't, 200k is just what the trip ended up being that day.


    Sorry I mean there was a 1L discrepancy for the full 200k trip, not 1L/100 .. so yes 0.5L per 100

    as 100 is to 5.5 as reported by the MFD

    11L vs 12L -for the full 200k trip

    cheers :)
     
  13. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    54,703
    38,242
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    I suspected I was preaching to the converted. Thanks for letting me off easy.
     
    ozmatt likes this.
  14. 05PreeUs

    05PreeUs Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2016
    1,097
    563
    0
    Location:
    MSP
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Update: Got to take Prius on a mini trip yesterday, just shy of 100 miles and so I took the opportunity to check the ODOmeter accuracy. Now, I did notice a very slight difference EB v WB on I-20, so clearly even the State of Texas cannot get this EXACT :(

    The odometer error with the currently installed ( Continental Control Contact Touring A/S 88t BSW ) tires is 1% HIGH > The odometer records 10.1 miles for each 10.00 driven.

    Note: Those were already installed on the used car, we simply replaced the one bad, one worn with like tires.
     
  15. Terrell

    Terrell Old-Timer

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    326
    169
    3
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I find that strange. When I go uphill (like in the Rockies of Colorado, or mountains in California), I pass everyone. Sure, the Prius is making a lot of noise, and my mileage drops, but I don't care. You must have some awfully steep hills, or else something else is wrong.
     
  16. ozmatt

    ozmatt Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    571
    234
    0
    Location:
    australia
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    One
    Multiple 10+ mile moderate to high grade mountain hills with 110km/h speed limit, battery has just enough time to recover around 4 bars then your at the bottom of another 10 mile mountain hill.. Prius runs out of energy in no time .. mfd shows battery at1 purple bar after 4 or 5 minutes then the prius has a job to hold 90km/h

    I notice your car is a 2010 they have a bigger engine and they also squeeze more limits from the battery, gen3 may be more useful in tough conditions than my old 2008
     
  17. Terrell

    Terrell Old-Timer

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    326
    169
    3
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    The speed limit here is 65-75 mph (depending where you are), which is 104-120 km/h. But you are quite correct, the 2010 does have a bigger engine. When I heard that they were starting to put a larger engine in starting with the 2010, I waited. :)
     
    ozmatt likes this.
  18. ozmatt

    ozmatt Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    571
    234
    0
    Location:
    australia
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    One
    :) the gen3 cars also push the limits of the hv battery a bit harder! something like 15-20% more available battery capacity than gen2

    "I think" in Australia hybrid Camry would be a much better choice if you use highways a lot but Prius wins hands down for a city commuter ..
     
  19. Joe-G

    Joe-G Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    243
    99
    0
    Location:
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Just got an email about this thread in my weekly "tapatalk" feed.

    Though my car is a gen 3, 2010 FWIW I've been tracking actual vs indicated mileage for 40,000 miles and the system is 4.2% more optimistic than the actual mileage. 51.17 indicated, 49.13 actual.

    My fuelly mileage shows higher because I stopped posting to it a while ago. It's ridiculous enough that I bother to track mileage in a spreadsheet, I don't need to track it on a website also!
     
    05PreeUs likes this.
  20. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    54,703
    38,242
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    I started out with just a spreadsheet, then decided to join fuelly. I found by dropping my existing values into a new spreadsheet tailored to fuelly format, I was able to import it all into fuelly in one step. Food for thought if you want to bring your fuelly account up to date.

    Now, I basically enter the info in my spreadsheet, then immediately over to fuelly, repeat. We're only filling up about once a month though, lol.

    My dash vs calculated error is 7.5% btw. Might have something to do with our 17" tires. But I kind of doubt it. And I run 195/65R15 snow tires every winter.