Two U.S. POW's Murdered

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 02:06 PM) [snapback]275437[/snapback]</div>

Name calling how Liberal and mature. Got anything to say regarding the topic? Your welcome to "Cut N' Run" just like last time.

Wildkow

 

The term chickenhawk describes a "hawk" who has never been in combat (Wikipedia®). Are you disputing that this is an accurate description of you?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 03:16 PM) [snapback]275475[/snapback]</div>

IsrAmeriPrius you have the mental ability of a . . . [attachmentid=3878] dodo
and the morales of a . . . [attachmentid=3882] vulture.

Still nothing concerning the subject of this topic? Yet you scream and whine and kick your heels about terrorist with pictures of women's panties on their heads or posing with US service women naked but nothing concerning this torture. Your own silence condemns you. . . I may be a chickenhawk sir but you are pure chicken.

Wildkow

p.s. God help the military if they ever let someone like you serve. You did serve right. . .?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 06:16 PM) [snapback]275475[/snapback]</div>

yeah, and let's hear about your heroic anti-war efforts... last i heard, cindy sheehan was making the news, not you, or any other ardent anti-bush/anti-war/chickenhawk calling soul on pc...



which reminds me, hey mikey, let's see some anti-war protest CV.... :lol:

 

Here we go again :angry: The right wingers come out slandering and lieing about anyone who holds a different viewpoint from you, then when someone digs back at you it's "Waa waa waa.. you liberals are insulting me" As In my first post on this thread, I thanked fshagan for being able to post viewpoints contrary to mine without the name calling lies and slander.

As I mentioned earlier why do you need to slander people who fought for this country and are continuing to fight just because they have a different political affiliation than you. You know, if someone lays his life on the line for this country, chances are he is on our side. You may drive a blue Prius, I drive a red one, you may like shrimp, I get a ride to the hospital if I eat one, we all have different tastes, preferences and desires. We each have our own ideas on how best to fight terrorism. Disagree, fine no problem, but accusing someone of being pro-terrorist because he or she has a different viewpoint, big problem. You call congressman Murtha "jihad jack" and then say he wants to redeploy our troups to Okinawa, as you guys like to holler show me the proof. Here is where Mr Murtha wants to redeploy the troups:

The full text is here: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/pa12_...a/pr060407.html

Not to get nit-picky, but I think these places are a tiny bit closer than Okinawa, but then again I suppose faux news and Ann Coulter have a better idea than he.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Jun 22 2006, 06:27 PM) [snapback]275565[/snapback]</div>

Expressing my horror at this barbarity will add nothing to this discussion which has not already been expressed by others. However, one wrong does not justify another. I never suggested that there is a moral equivalence between these two events, as your post would libelously imply. Besides, I thought we had the moral high ground.

When I debate, I do so on my own terms, not yours. Thank you for playing and showing your true hypocritic self.

I am done with this topic.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 08:08 PM) [snapback]275612[/snapback]</div>

"Cut n Run"

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 03:16 PM) [snapback]275475[/snapback]</div>

It is also considered an insult, is it not? Or, as Wikipedia puts it, a "political epithet"? They further explain it as a "perjorative political epithet" on the linked page explaining what a "political epithet" is.

Do you really think someone would agree that it is an "accurate description" of them?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tleonhar @ Jun 22 2006, 07:39 PM) [snapback]275601[/snapback]</div>

Speaking of liar's look what the cat drug in . . . So which lie are you accusing the right wingers of tlieohar?

Folks here is the "Whole Truth" something the "Cut n Run" Bush Bashing Left tries to hide.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13296235/page/2/

MR. ROVE: Congressman Murtha said, “Let’s redeploy them immediately to another country in the Middle East. Let’s get out of Iraq and go to another country.†My question is, what country would take us? What country would say after the United States cut and run from Iraq, what country in the Middle East would say, “Yeah. Paint a big target on our back and then you’ll cut and run on us.†What country would say that? What country would accept our troops?

MR. RUSSERT: What’s your response?

REP. MURTHA: There’s many countries understand the importance of stability in the Middle East. This is an international problem. We, we use 20 million barrels of oil a day. China’s the second largest user. All these countries understand you need stability for the energy supply that’s available in the Middle East. So there’s many, many countries.

MR. RUSSERT: Who?

REP. MURTHA: Kuwait’s one that will take us. Qatar, we already have bases in Qatar. So Bahrain. All those countries are willing to take the United States. Now, Saudi Arabia won’t because they wanted us out of there in the first place. So—and we don’t have to be right there. We can go to Okinawa. We, we don’t have—we can redeploy there almost instantly. So that’s not—that’s, that’s a fallacy. That, that’s just a statement to rial up people to support a failed policy wrapped in illusion.

MR. RUSSERT: But it’d be tough to have a timely response from Okinawa.

REP. MURTHA: Well, it—you know, they—when I say Okinawa, I, I’m saying troops in Okinawa. When I say a timely response, you know, our fighters can fly from Okinawa very quickly. And—and—when they don’t know we’re coming. There’s no question about it. And, and where those airplanes won’t—came from I can’t tell you, but, but I’ll tell you one thing, it doesn’t take very long for them to get in with cruise missiles or with, with fighter aircraft or, or attack aircraft, it doesn’t take any time at all. So we, we have done—this one particular operation, to say that that couldn’t have done, done—it was done from the outside, for heaven’s sakes.


I especially like this part when Russert pins him to a major "Flip-Flop" from his own book. . .

MR. RUSSERT: But in 2004, you had a view that was much different than you had now, and this is what you wrote in your book: “A war initiated on faulty intelligence must not be followed by a premature withdrawal of our troops based on a political timetable. An untimely exit could rapidly devolve into a civil war, which would leave America’s foreign policy in disarray as countries question not only America’s judgment but also its perseverance.†Aren’t you now advocating that?

Murtha accuses the Right of political motivations regarding their decision making in Iraqi. Well now what are Murtha's motivations? Let's see . . .

REP. MURTHA: Well, “stay the course†is “stay and pay.†This is the thing that has worried me right along. We’re spending $8 billion dollars a month, $300 million dollars a day. And to give you some perspective of what that means, Gates said, “I’m going to quit the corporation, or I’m going to—less time with the corporation.†Well, you weigh $30 billion dollars. That’s four months of the cost of this war. This port security, if you want to spend more money, it’d would take 47 years the way we’re spending it. Education, the No Child Left Behind, a couple months of the war would pay for that. Whose going to, whose going to pay for this down the road? Our children and grandchildren are paying for this war. And then you have the, the, the emotional strain, the, the, the people who are being hurt.

Huh? :blink: A more politically muddled reply I have not heard it doesn't even make sense. Laughable and too boot he tosses in money as a reason. HA! What!?! sell off security for America because of the cost! Boot this guy back to the briar patch PA voters! Not even his own party wants this worthless idea enough to vote for it.

Wildkow

tlieohar just to show no hard feeling when you falsely accused people that don't agree with you of being liar's we have taken up a collection and would like you to send your address to a neutral party at priuschat so that we may send a reconciliation gift of one pound of fresh shrimp.

BTW it's appox. 5000 miles to Okinawa from Iraq at jet speeds it would still take over 8 hours to arrive on station.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Jun 22 2006, 08:08 PM) [snapback]275612[/snapback]</div>

You thought you had the high ground BaHaHaHaHa [attachmentid=3887] Not only are you a another pathetic Far Left Sheeple [attachmentid=3886] but everyone knows that your ilk have no concept of moral's.

Sure your done with this topic cause you have no reply to justify your outrageous statement's another "Cut n Run" liberal cut from the same cloth as Jumpin Jihad Jack "Murtha" Thank God the Democratic Party still has adherents far better than you.

Good Riddance to you . . . [attachmentid=3888]

Wildkow

 

[attachmentid=3946][attachmentid=3945][attachmentid=3945]<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tleonhar @ Jun 22 2006, 10:39 PM) [snapback]275601[/snapback]</div>

Its not Jihad Murthas job to redeploy anyone - he isn't the Commander-in-Chief! Its his job to back Bush's plan and shut up.

 

Deleted. Garbage posts like the one above deserve no future attention from any self-respecting PCers.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mirza @ Jun 27 2006, 12:07 AM) [snapback]277198[/snapback]</div>

Obviously you can't handle the truth!

 

Blind faith is unpatriotic.