1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Shell calls food-crop biofuels 'morally inappropriate'

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by AnOldHouse, Jul 6, 2006.

  1. AnOldHouse

    AnOldHouse Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    677
    1
    0
    Location:
    Middlesex County, Connecticut
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6091132.html

    Shell calls food-crop biofuels 'morally inappropriate'
    Reuters
    Published on ZDNet News: July 6, 2006, 7:49 AM PT

    Royal Dutch Shell, the world's top marketer of biofuels, considers using food crops to make biofuels "morally inappropriate" as long as there are people in the world who are starving, an executive said Thursday.

    Eric Holthusen, a fuels technology manager for the Asia-Pacific region, said the company's research unit, Shell Global Solutions, has developed alternative fuels from renewable resources that use wood chips and plant waste rather than food crops that are typically used to make the fuels.

    Holthusen said his company's participation in marketing biofuels extracted from food was driven by economics or legislation.

    "If we have the choice today, then we will not use this route," Malaysia-based Holthusen said at a seminar in Singapore.

    "We think morally it is inappropriate because what we are doing here is using food and turning it into fuel. If you look at Africa, there are still countries that have a lack of food, people are starving, and because we are more wealthy, we use food and turn it into fuel. This is not what we would like to see. But sometimes economics force you to do it."

    The world's top commercially produced biofuels are ethanol and biodiesel.

    Ethanol, mostly used in the United States and Brazil, is produced from sugar cane and beets and can also be derived from grains such as corn and wheat. Biodiesel, used in Europe, is extracted from the continent's predominant oil crop, rapeseed, and can also be produced from palm and coconut.

    Holthusen said Shell has been working on biofuels that can be extracted from plant waste and wood chips, but he did not say when the alternative biofuel might be commercially available.

    "We are not resting. We are doing what everybody needs to do. We have worked overtime on an alternative to get away from food, and this is what we call the second generation of biofuels," he said.

    He said Shell, in partnership with Canadian biotech firm Iogen, has developed "cellulose ethanol," which is made from the wood chips and nonfood portion of renewable feedstocks such as cereal straws and corn stover, and can be blended with gasoline. Ethanol is typically extracted from sugarcane or grain.
     
  2. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(AnOldHouse @ Jul 6 2006, 12:40 PM) [snapback]282110[/snapback]</div>
    The follow up question for Shell is to ask if spending money non essential luxuries when it could be spent on food also morally inappropriate?
     
  3. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    That and only a small amount of US corn actually feeds people. The vast majority is used to feed cattle and University of Nebraska football players. Distillers' grains, which are a by product of the ethanol production process, are sold as cattle feed. Of course, American corn ethanol isn't scalable much beyond what we've got now and corn, in general, is a pretty environmentally harsh agri-product. Shell is correct that cellulosic ethanol is the better way to go, for a variety of reasons.
     
  4. gschoen

    gschoen Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    343
    3
    0
    Location:
    Chicago/Wrigleyville
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Using waste products to make energy is always the best, of course.

    But "morally inappropriate" is just rhetoric at its best. Starvation and famine are due to economics and war disrupting distribution and interfering with production. The world capacity for growing food exceeds demand. If developed countries would eliminate farm subsidies, it would do more to help developing countries agriculture competitive and sustainable.

    World peace would be helpful too, but eliminating farm subsides would be a good first step.