Environmental News

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by tochatihu, Oct 22, 2015.

  1. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,518
    3,676
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    I put my Culicidae marker down and I'm pleased that others have done so as well.

    Food webs of aquatic dragonfly larvae to some extent depend on mosquito larvae. That is the only system that lends itself to experimental manipulation that I can think of. Food switching when some sources become (are made) limited would be a starting point.

    ==
    One could certainly fault the foresight and recognize negative consequences of humans banishing top predators that feed on human food animals. But functional analogies may not be instructive. Mosquitoes being at the bottom of food chain and predators being at top.

    I use food chain and food web as descriptions while recognizing that they are not identical. Hope readers can allow that.

    ==
    "I'm not opposed to DNA editing for zany religious reasons, but I am not confident that we're going to be very good at it"

    How zany figures here I do not know. But 'we' are already very good at it.

    ==
    The main point must be kept in view here. Were mosquitoes not humans' worst killers, nobody would be plotting and planning against them in several ways.
     
  2. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,518
    3,676
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    This week, Science journal offers some gloom. On the factual side, examining budget cuts:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ady5151

    (Vax vs. diseases)

    https://www.science.org/content/article/final-nsf-budget-proposal-jettisons-one-giant-telescope-amid-savage-agencywide-cuts

    (although including “savage” in title goes towards editorial)

    And an editorial:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adz5024

    I quote two sentences from that for comment:

    “Why would world-class researchers stay in US universities under these conditions? Why would the best international students come to institutions under siege when other countries offer stability, funding, and respect for academic expertise?”

    There are reasons for staying. It is home and developed laboratories would take time and effort to re create elsewhere. Unless abandoning US citizenship, world-class researchers will still pay US tax on foreign income above USD$120k (and world-class researchers exceed that). Most importantly and less gloomy, those with long views might expect current US perturbations to not persist.

    In contrast, international students considering US research institutions have shorter time frames. If they are all that smart, they will make rational assessments. Including ‘elsewheres’ that are now shopping.
     
  3. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    112,212
    51,052
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i think that 'what we're not good at' is understanding all the possible ramifications of our decisions.

    an acquaintance runs a research lab at a local hospital. he said that no funding has been cut yet, but he is concerned and preparing by slowing hiring and other future investments.
     
    tochatihu likes this.
  4. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,518
    3,676
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Right you are @bisco but "all the possible" seems overstated and actually not necessary. Knowing food webs well is a big plus.

    Species removals and 'additions' have historically offered a wide range of missteps (for teaching purposes :D) . More recently there having been highly successful parasite introductions against agricultural pests. I have not yet seen them collected into a review article. It would be fun to read.
     
  5. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,518
    3,676
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    bwilson4web likes this.
  6. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    28,265
    15,992
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    An excellent high level view, for tactical information and guidance, I recommend:
    Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined

    Another approach, I prefer to grab skeptics by the wallet. It is significantly cheaper:
    • EVs and PHEV (100 mi range) - saves ~2-3x over our efficient Prius
    • Home solar - in my case, saving +$100/month, non-taxable
    • surfing the weather - relearning how to live with the man-made, changed climate
    Bob Wilson
     
  7. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    112,212
    51,052
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i haven't been able to change any minds or hearts
     
  8. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    20,834
    8,627
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
  9. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    20,834
    8,627
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    Funny you should mention this. I was about to post our 7yr ownership review of the Pacifica plug-in hybrid. Not a light vehicle by any means. The range calculator does its estimates based on 400 mile increments. This being spring, not needing to run the electric heat or air conditioning gives us a much higher readout versus dead of winter well below freezing - causes the ICE to kick in (so things remain at it's Winter's Optimum eficiency;

    20250625_123232.jpg

    Spring driving is the best!
    Their plug-in hybrid pickupis way late to market, but we will be trading this bad boy in for it once they finally get their act together.
    140mi ev range + DC QC

    .
     
    #2710 hill, Jun 25, 2025 at 2:58 PM
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2025 at 3:06 PM
    bwilson4web likes this.