Double impeachment gains momentum

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 7 2007, 01:48 PM) [snapback]401809[/snapback]</div>

Would it be as big a distraction as waging war with, and invading, a tiny country on the other side of the planet based on inaccurate "intelligence", spending years and billions of tax dollars and allowing thousands of our kids to die fighting for the right of the oil companies to ....ah never mind.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Mar 8 2007, 12:44 PM) [snapback]402265[/snapback]</div>

Nope, not really. You were just commenting that we were all like rabid dogs wanting to feed on the President. I was just pointing out your hypocrisy.

I will tell you with certainty that I NEVER want to know intimate details about a President's sex life, whoever he/she may be. And if someone has the audacity to ask personal details about the President's sex life (provided it's not a CRIMINAL offense), then I have no problems with that same President lying--the question shouldn't have been asked in the first place. And therefore, I wouldn't think impeachment would be warranted. Again, my opinion.

However, compared with lying about the reasons for starting a war...that I can't deal with.

Thinking the constitution is just a GD piece of paper...he took an oath to uphold it, after all...that I can't deal with.

Saying that if treasonous leaks came from his own office or that of his cabinet, he would "deal with it," then not dealing with it at all...that I can't handle, either.

Throwing a surplus away on an unjust war...that I can't deal with.

Losing focus on who the bad guys really are...and letting them remain free...that I can't deal with.

I have no desire for evening the score. Hell--it isn't even the same game, so it's impossible to do so. I DO have a desire to ensure this Prez goes down as one of the worst in the history of this great country. Adding impeachment to his other "legacies" would help this cause.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(livelychick @ Mar 8 2007, 12:04 PM) [snapback]402287[/snapback]</div>

Is there anything you can handle? Doesn't look like it, but just checking.

You're not getting your impeachment. You heard it here, it's not going to happen. Foam about the mouth about it all you want... Just not gonna happen.

Hahahahhaa.... and I think that's GREAT!!! No impeachment for you or yours... LOL.... SWEET!!!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Mar 8 2007, 01:08 PM) [snapback]402291[/snapback]</div>

take a deep breath, daron, let it out slowly...

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Doberman @ Mar 8 2007, 01:58 PM) [snapback]402275[/snapback]</div>

Oh My God! Doberman has a follower! Welcome to Priuschat, Doberman! Should we call them Doberman1 and Doberman2; or Doberman and mini-Doberman? :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(larkinmj @ Mar 8 2007, 01:23 PM) [snapback]402302[/snapback]</div>

Hey! Don't be lumping me in with that yappy poodle! He's been giving me a bad name for too long.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have a cat chase scheduled for 1:30.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Mar 8 2007, 12:23 PM) [snapback]402303[/snapback]</div>

No Impeachment for you either!!!

:lol:

You ain't gettin one... nah nah na na naaaaa....

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MarinJohn @ Mar 8 2007, 12:52 PM) [snapback]402271[/snapback]</div>

fortunately you lost everyone there at "can:" :lol:

 

How about a censure? Can we get a censure for Bush & Cheney, I would be happy with that.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(etyler88 @ Mar 8 2007, 01:48 PM) [snapback]402321[/snapback]</div>

no you cant
stop being so self centered :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daronspicher @ Mar 8 2007, 10:30 AM) [snapback]402308[/snapback]</div>

Moderators: Isn't there an age requirement that posters to Priuschat have to be more than 4 years old?

Just wondering.

Mark Baird
Alameda CA

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(etyler88 @ Mar 8 2007, 01:48 PM) [snapback]402321[/snapback]</div>

Lets skip impeachment and go directly to a war crimes trial .
I accuse Bush Cheney Rumsfield with the targeting and murder of journalists in Iraq.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(airportkid @ Mar 8 2007, 03:03 PM) [snapback]402376[/snapback]</div>

obviously not
heck they even let people from CA onto this BB :blink:

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mojo @ Mar 8 2007, 03:19 PM) [snapback]402383[/snapback]</div>

They obviously have bad aim :lol:
How could they have missed the NY Times building and run into the WTC's?
And the mistook the Pentagon for the WaPo HQ - jeez.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(airportkid @ Mar 8 2007, 03:03 PM) [snapback]402376[/snapback]</div>

I volunteer a lot in my community. On behalf of all the 4 year-olds I've ever met, I demand an apology ofr your comparison! :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(etyler88 @ Mar 7 2007, 01:05 PM) [snapback]401815[/snapback]</div>

I agree with the guy saying this would be a waste of time. It's VERY late in the game - spending the money, media focus and congressional time to handle this would produce no beneficial end result for the USA except more hits on the economy, Wall Street uncertainty, etc. The 'feel good' element of having done it would not be worth the cost.

I initially was in favor of Clinton being impeached at the time due to my anger at his lies and his past corruption (and Hillary's), but in the end, that too was a total waste of time. Nothing good came of it.

The time for impeaching Bush would've been, oh, the last election. Or before, when found that our military was thrust into the Quest for WMD's that weren't there... Or any number of other scams: Halliburton, Bin Laden family being ushered out of the country right after 9/11, etc.