1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Another Idiot Reporter

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by IsrAmeriPrius, May 24, 2007.

  1. Presto

    Presto Has his homepage set to PC

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    1,326
    24
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jkash @ May 27 2007, 04:49 PM) [snapback]450764[/snapback]</div>
    I regularly drive like a "crazy person" on my trips to the Interior. A day of pedal-to-the-floor driving, and I was at 37MPG over 1100km. I don't see how any 'normal' driver could do any less then 40mpg on a really bad tank. Maybe with a fully loaded vehicle. 33MPG was probably achieved by moving the car from the street up onto the driveway, and into the carhole. :p
     
  2. Topgas

    Topgas New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    96
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ May 25 2007, 03:48 PM) [snapback]450013[/snapback]</div>
    I think the Prius is seen as a threat to the good old American life style that we are entitled too in this country. The car makers are scared they won't make it with low 20K cars since their fixed over head costs are so damn high. Car buyers don't like the idea of being crunchy and to have to sacrifice their 0-60 mph acceleration. The image of the hippie movement doesn't help either, look at the bumper stickers on the bumpers of Priuses and you'll see why some people don't want the assocation with hybrids. I say "bring it on" , just a quote from my fearless warrior George. 3rd quarter of this year will bring a whole new meaning to hyrbids.
     
  3. Newsmom

    Newsmom Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    21
    4
    0
    Location:
    Laurel, MD
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    In defense of idiot reporters:

    Yes, the best reaction is to contact the reporter directly, AND his/her supervising editor. You would be well-advised to take a very gentle approach to correcting some "misunderstandings" that the reporter passed along. It doesn't do you any good to vent at the reporter, rather you want to urge the reporter to take another look at the data behind the story. You also want to urge them to correct any online versions of the story, lest their mistake (errrr... misunderstanding) be passed along and cited by "the many people who scrutinize these articles for accuracy."

    Stupid, idiotic mistakes happen. I'm sorry, but they do. They're not always an indication of hostility, just carelessness.

    I've been in news a mere 35 years. I got someone's age wrong once. It happens. We're not ALL idiots, but we do have our share.