1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Why is the Hummer hated?!

Discussion in 'Other Cars' started by PriusOwner004, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. MegansPrius

    MegansPrius GoogleMeister, AKA bongokitty

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    2,437
    27
    0
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sarge @ Sep 13 2007, 12:31 PM) [snapback]511964[/snapback]</div>
    The 3% seems a slight paraphase of the source below:
    April 20, 2004, WSJ
    The Wall Street Journal, "U.S. May Set Criteria For Seat Belts in Rollovers"
    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is looking at establishing a performance requirement for seat belts in rollover crashes. Currently there are none.
    Mr. Tyson's comments came in response to a new report from Public Citizen charging that seat belts aren't adequately protecting people in rollovers. Some 2,000 belted occupants are dying in rollover crashes a year, with about half of them partially ejected from the vehicle, the report says. The primary benefit of a seat belt in rollovers is to prevent ejection. The report blames poorly designed and performing seat belts.
    The Public Citizen report comes as it and other consumer-safety groups are trying to keep pressure on Congress to enact new auto-safety measures as part of the massive highway bill. The Senate version of the bill included numerous safety provisions, such as new standards for roof-crush and seat-belt performance in rollovers. Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen and a former NHTSA administrator, said rollovers should be highly survivable crashes, because the force is spread out over several seconds, compared with the quick smash in, say, a frontal collision. But because of antiquated roof-crush standards and poorly designed seat belts, they have become a particularly lethal type of crash. Rollovers account for 3% of accidents, but one-third of occupant fatalities.
    reproduced at http://www.vehicle-injuries.com/suv-safety-news-2004.htm

    Though my favorite article on the misperception of SUV safety (which I learned of from a Priuschat posting by NuShrike) is the Big and Bad article by Blink author Malcolm Gladwell
    http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_01_12_a_suv.html
     
  2. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(patsparks @ Sep 13 2007, 07:18 AM) [snapback]511841[/snapback]</div>
    Wow, I'm utterly impressed with the might of the Australian military and economy!! You guys rock! Tell us more!!! And maybe one day we can be like you.
     
  3. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(patsparks @ Sep 13 2007, 07:18 AM) [snapback]511841[/snapback]</div>
    Wow, I'm utterly impressed with the might of the Australian military and economy!! You guys rock! Tell us more!!! And maybe one day we can be like you.
     
  4. member

    member New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    197
    1
    0
    I don't like the color.
     
  5. member

    member New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    197
    1
    0
    I don't like the color.
     
  6. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IAO @ Sep 13 2007, 08:08 AM) [snapback]511858[/snapback]</div>
    I've PM-d you. If I post the video here, it'll turn into a long discussion about me and that wasn't the purpose of this thread. So check your inbox and enjoy!
     
  7. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IAO @ Sep 13 2007, 08:08 AM) [snapback]511858[/snapback]</div>
    I've PM-d you. If I post the video here, it'll turn into a long discussion about me and that wasn't the purpose of this thread. So check your inbox and enjoy!
     
  8. viking31

    viking31 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    515
    22
    0
    Location:
    West Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(patsparks @ Sep 13 2007, 08:18 AM) [snapback]511841[/snapback]</div>
    Hmm, what if Australia went into a conflict with the very country supplying a critical military component? I would be concerned.

    The primary purpose of sourcing most components of our nations military is to ensure the reliable supply of the components (and their corresponding spare parts) in the event of a major worldwide type of military operation (such as WWII). Oh sure, politics plays a big role in landing military contracts too (think Ted Kennedy, Lynn MA, jet engines...both Republicans and Democrats will grab that pork faster than a starving dog). Just a few generations ago we were enemies with Japan and allied with Russia. Now the converse is true.

    The world situation is always in flux (has been that way ever since recorded history) and it is considered unwise to rely on other countries for most of your military hardware.

    Case in point. Just a few decades ago Iran was considered an ally to the US. We sold to them many advanced F-14 fighter jets. Now that Iran is seen as more of a threat to the US as each day passes, the US has made considerable strides to destroy all US based F-14's (now considered an obsolete fighter for the US) which were in "mothball" reserve to prevent the supply of spare parts reaching Iran necessary to operate Iran's remaining F-14's.

    I used to fly military and I can assure you a ready supply of spare parts is critical to keeping complex military aircraft flying and mission operable. The day will come soon when Iran will be lucky to even start its last F-14 without the necessary supply of spare parts much less launch any sort of operational offensive.

    Rick
    #4 2006
     
  9. viking31

    viking31 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    515
    22
    0
    Location:
    West Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(patsparks @ Sep 13 2007, 08:18 AM) [snapback]511841[/snapback]</div>
    Hmm, what if Australia went into a conflict with the very country supplying a critical military component? I would be concerned.

    The primary purpose of sourcing most components of our nations military is to ensure the reliable supply of the components (and their corresponding spare parts) in the event of a major worldwide type of military operation (such as WWII). Oh sure, politics plays a big role in landing military contracts too (think Ted Kennedy, Lynn MA, jet engines...both Republicans and Democrats will grab that pork faster than a starving dog). Just a few generations ago we were enemies with Japan and allied with Russia. Now the converse is true.

    The world situation is always in flux (has been that way ever since recorded history) and it is considered unwise to rely on other countries for most of your military hardware.

    Case in point. Just a few decades ago Iran was considered an ally to the US. We sold to them many advanced F-14 fighter jets. Now that Iran is seen as more of a threat to the US as each day passes, the US has made considerable strides to destroy all US based F-14's (now considered an obsolete fighter for the US) which were in "mothball" reserve to prevent the supply of spare parts reaching Iran necessary to operate Iran's remaining F-14's.

    I used to fly military and I can assure you a ready supply of spare parts is critical to keeping complex military aircraft flying and mission operable. The day will come soon when Iran will be lucky to even start its last F-14 without the necessary supply of spare parts much less launch any sort of operational offensive.

    Rick
    #4 2006
     
  10. iaowings

    iaowings New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    450
    0
    0
    ok got the video and ok I called BS and you proved it not to be. don’t get to upset. I will admit it looks like you didn’t take damage I agree and yes hummers are tuff. that truck wasn’t going all that fast and to take that kind of damage makes me wonder about the trucks quality. it didn’t look like the truck took a lot of damage but I think that was the camera angle.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MegansPrius @ Sep 13 2007, 02:42 PM) [snapback]512013[/snapback]</div>

    i heard the 33% thing or whatever it was on NPR the other morning.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MegansPrius @ Sep 13 2007, 02:42 PM) [snapback]512013[/snapback]</div>

    i heard the 33% thing or whatever it was on NPR the other morning.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PriusOwner004 @ Sep 12 2007, 03:27 AM) [snapback]511133[/snapback]</div>
    this is really what set me off “dude†watch your own video your right rear wheel lifted off the ground and u didn’t feel the impact??? not trying to start a fight but jeeesh
     
  11. iaowings

    iaowings New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    450
    0
    0
    ok got the video and ok I called BS and you proved it not to be. don’t get to upset. I will admit it looks like you didn’t take damage I agree and yes hummers are tuff. that truck wasn’t going all that fast and to take that kind of damage makes me wonder about the trucks quality. it didn’t look like the truck took a lot of damage but I think that was the camera angle.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MegansPrius @ Sep 13 2007, 02:42 PM) [snapback]512013[/snapback]</div>

    i heard the 33% thing or whatever it was on NPR the other morning.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MegansPrius @ Sep 13 2007, 02:42 PM) [snapback]512013[/snapback]</div>

    i heard the 33% thing or whatever it was on NPR the other morning.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PriusOwner004 @ Sep 12 2007, 03:27 AM) [snapback]511133[/snapback]</div>
    this is really what set me off “dude†watch your own video your right rear wheel lifted off the ground and u didn’t feel the impact??? not trying to start a fight but jeeesh
     
  12. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IAO @ Sep 13 2007, 02:49 PM) [snapback]512064[/snapback]</div>
    The wheel did not lift. The H1 slided a few inches, so the wheels drifted, but did not lift. It would be impossible to lift during such impact.
    I'm sorry, it's hard to see on this video. The original video isn't that great either, as my cameras are set I think to 10 frames per second. In any other vehicle including an SUV I would have hit my head on the side window and as I said, not only didn't I get the slightest bit injured, my body did not even move and I did not feel the impact. Truck driver was in the hospital for neck injuries, his inoperable truck towed, and I continued on my marry way with an inch long crack in the paint.
    Similar accident happened to me in my Miata, except not in my drive way, but on the road. A truck hit it and it made me go over the concrete median and into incoming traffic. I consider myself the luckiest guy alive, as at that very moment there were no cars on this very busy street (because they were all waiting on a red light, thank god!!). The very same accident happened yesterday in Vegas and the lady died because she wasn't as lucky and when the truck pushed her into incoming traffic there were other cars there and they smashed her.
    So you see, two similar accidents, one with an H1, one with a Miata. H1 no damage or injuries, moved a couple of inches due to impact, Miata had the rear destroyed, "flew" over a concrete median and had there been incoming traffic I would have been dead, guaranteed.
    I'm not saying that SUVs are safe. They are not. H1 is not an SUV. If the Miata or possibly even the H1 accident happened in an H2 or any other SUV, the SUV would have very likely rolled over and then even without incoming traffic, death could have found me. It happens all the time. I feel SAFER in my Prius than in any SUV out there. I feel INVINCIBLE in the H1 (strong word, but that's how I feel and there is a reason for it). Now, if I were in Iraq, I would be scared sh*tless with all the IEDs, etc, but in Vegas things are different :) Plus since my H1 is lightly armored (bullet proof windows, etc), I can pass through the bad neighborhoods without worrying about getting car-jacked ;-)
    So again, I'm not advocating owning H1s. I would hate it myself if there were too many of them on the roads. I'm just stating some facts.

    And by the way, this thread wasn't supposed to be about H1's safety or off-roading capabilities. It was supposed to be about the fact that the handful (12,000) civilian H1s ever built have no noticeable impact on global warming or global polution in general, especially since many of us now are converting to alternative fuels, such as biodiesel, straight veggie oil, etc. And there is no no need to hate a limited production "Weekend Toy" vehicle or its owners or stereotype them.
     
  13. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IAO @ Sep 13 2007, 02:49 PM) [snapback]512064[/snapback]</div>
    The wheel did not lift. The H1 slided a few inches, so the wheels drifted, but did not lift. It would be impossible to lift during such impact.
    I'm sorry, it's hard to see on this video. The original video isn't that great either, as my cameras are set I think to 10 frames per second. In any other vehicle including an SUV I would have hit my head on the side window and as I said, not only didn't I get the slightest bit injured, my body did not even move and I did not feel the impact. Truck driver was in the hospital for neck injuries, his inoperable truck towed, and I continued on my marry way with an inch long crack in the paint.
    Similar accident happened to me in my Miata, except not in my drive way, but on the road. A truck hit it and it made me go over the concrete median and into incoming traffic. I consider myself the luckiest guy alive, as at that very moment there were no cars on this very busy street (because they were all waiting on a red light, thank god!!). The very same accident happened yesterday in Vegas and the lady died because she wasn't as lucky and when the truck pushed her into incoming traffic there were other cars there and they smashed her.
    So you see, two similar accidents, one with an H1, one with a Miata. H1 no damage or injuries, moved a couple of inches due to impact, Miata had the rear destroyed, "flew" over a concrete median and had there been incoming traffic I would have been dead, guaranteed.
    I'm not saying that SUVs are safe. They are not. H1 is not an SUV. If the Miata or possibly even the H1 accident happened in an H2 or any other SUV, the SUV would have very likely rolled over and then even without incoming traffic, death could have found me. It happens all the time. I feel SAFER in my Prius than in any SUV out there. I feel INVINCIBLE in the H1 (strong word, but that's how I feel and there is a reason for it). Now, if I were in Iraq, I would be scared sh*tless with all the IEDs, etc, but in Vegas things are different :) Plus since my H1 is lightly armored (bullet proof windows, etc), I can pass through the bad neighborhoods without worrying about getting car-jacked ;-)
    So again, I'm not advocating owning H1s. I would hate it myself if there were too many of them on the roads. I'm just stating some facts.

    And by the way, this thread wasn't supposed to be about H1's safety or off-roading capabilities. It was supposed to be about the fact that the handful (12,000) civilian H1s ever built have no noticeable impact on global warming or global polution in general, especially since many of us now are converting to alternative fuels, such as biodiesel, straight veggie oil, etc. And there is no no need to hate a limited production "Weekend Toy" vehicle or its owners or stereotype them.
     
  14. Duffer

    Duffer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    271
    15
    0
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    The father of the H1 was designed for the military and their needs as they saw them. The Hummer is wide so that it is stable and can run in the same tracks as the M1 Tank and the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. The Hummer can fill many roles that the military had needs for; TOW missile launcher, Anti-Aircraft, Ambulance, Command Center, scout vehicle, ect. Road side bombs and calling on them to operate without heavy armor backup has gotten our men killed, the Hummer is not perfect.
    The average Joe has no need to drive a H1 on our public roads, driving one is an exercise in dealing with all of its shortcomings; too wide, interior room intruded on by the drivetrain tucked up into it, poor handling on the road, poor acceleration, poor highway performance, the list goes on and on. You chose to purchase it for what ever reason you had at the time and if you still love it today then great for you! Running your Hummer on Biodiesel is like farting in the wind negatives, very little is changed by your efforts, you said that "you don't put that many miles on it anyways."
    The Austrailian Military vs the U.S. Military; lets just say that we are friends, don't get into a pissing contest.
     
  15. Duffer

    Duffer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    271
    15
    0
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    The father of the H1 was designed for the military and their needs as they saw them. The Hummer is wide so that it is stable and can run in the same tracks as the M1 Tank and the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. The Hummer can fill many roles that the military had needs for; TOW missile launcher, Anti-Aircraft, Ambulance, Command Center, scout vehicle, ect. Road side bombs and calling on them to operate without heavy armor backup has gotten our men killed, the Hummer is not perfect.
    The average Joe has no need to drive a H1 on our public roads, driving one is an exercise in dealing with all of its shortcomings; too wide, interior room intruded on by the drivetrain tucked up into it, poor handling on the road, poor acceleration, poor highway performance, the list goes on and on. You chose to purchase it for what ever reason you had at the time and if you still love it today then great for you! Running your Hummer on Biodiesel is like farting in the wind negatives, very little is changed by your efforts, you said that "you don't put that many miles on it anyways."
    The Austrailian Military vs the U.S. Military; lets just say that we are friends, don't get into a pissing contest.
     
  16. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PriusOwner004 @ Sep 12 2007, 07:53 PM) [snapback]511662[/snapback]</div>
    Let me say I love the the idea of biofuels, but its naive to think that this is a miracle cure for a dirty diesel engine. For the most part, running SVO is better than dino-diesel, but less clean than biodiesel emissions wise which we've already shown are much less clean than a hybrid.

    Reduction relative to dino-diesel:
    ----------CO---------HC-------NOx------PM
    B100----48%-------67%-----+10%--- 48%
    V100----23%-----10.7%------2.8%----0%?

    source for biodiesel: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/analysis/biodsl/p02001.pdf
    source for SVO: http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/01/30/na...ie-oil-emissio/

    So other than a slight improvement in NOx, SVO (V100) seems to be significantly dirtier than straight biodiesel (B100). I believe this gets worse when you talk about WVO, as even after filtering and settling there is a fair amount of impurity in the oil due to fine grain residual particles and molecular changes in the oil itself after sustained high temperature exposure.

    This brings us to CO2. Some claim biofuels are "carbon nuetral", some claim they are not. Myself I really like the idea, but I'm very concerned about the environmental consequences of large scale adoption. As an example, when it comes to buying fuel, most people are going to pick the cheapest source available. The cheapest way to get veggie oil is from foreign palm plantations. Palm oil production is quickly turning a number of developing nations into yet another environmental disaster area: http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0425-oil_palm.html

    Cutting down or burning 10s of millions of acres of rain forest that would have continued taking CO2 out of the air for 100s or 1000s of years, planting it with palm trees, abusing the heck out of the land and leaving it dead and depleted after 25 yrs doesn't sound very neutral to me. Despite the scale of the these operations, the current annual production of palm oil from Indonesia would satisfy the current US oil demand for 4 days. Given that palm oil is 100 times more area efficient than soy, and 300 times than corn, you can quickly start to get a sense of just what kind of massive consumption of resources would be required to shift our current consumption to vegetable oil. There are relatively clean, sustainable ways to produce biofuels, but there is currently no economic incentive to use them. This issue probably tosses the economic security back into play as well. Whose going to pay US growers $3 a gallon for corn or canola oil when you can buy palm oil from SE Asia for $1.30? There's a nice stable part of the world to be dependant on :blink:

    To call SVO, WVO, or even biodiesel "carbon nuetral" seems to me to be pretty misleading. Right up there with buying carbon offsets :) (not green energy credits, the we'll plant a tree somewhere in the amazon and offset your entire carbon footprint for $10 kind). Its probably still better carbon wise than gasoline, but does it make up for all its other problems with enough margin to justify driving a 15mpg vehicle?

    I'm glad that on some level you realize this and drive your Hummer as little as possible B) Now I just have to figure out what to do about my D#mn Land Rover :rolleyes:

    Rob
     
  17. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PriusOwner004 @ Sep 12 2007, 07:53 PM) [snapback]511662[/snapback]</div>
    Let me say I love the the idea of biofuels, but its naive to think that this is a miracle cure for a dirty diesel engine. For the most part, running SVO is better than dino-diesel, but less clean than biodiesel emissions wise which we've already shown are much less clean than a hybrid.

    Reduction relative to dino-diesel:
    ----------CO---------HC-------NOx------PM
    B100----48%-------67%-----+10%--- 48%
    V100----23%-----10.7%------2.8%----0%?

    source for biodiesel: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/analysis/biodsl/p02001.pdf
    source for SVO: http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/01/30/na...ie-oil-emissio/

    So other than a slight improvement in NOx, SVO (V100) seems to be significantly dirtier than straight biodiesel (B100). I believe this gets worse when you talk about WVO, as even after filtering and settling there is a fair amount of impurity in the oil due to fine grain residual particles and molecular changes in the oil itself after sustained high temperature exposure.

    This brings us to CO2. Some claim biofuels are "carbon nuetral", some claim they are not. Myself I really like the idea, but I'm very concerned about the environmental consequences of large scale adoption. As an example, when it comes to buying fuel, most people are going to pick the cheapest source available. The cheapest way to get veggie oil is from foreign palm plantations. Palm oil production is quickly turning a number of developing nations into yet another environmental disaster area: http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0425-oil_palm.html

    Cutting down or burning 10s of millions of acres of rain forest that would have continued taking CO2 out of the air for 100s or 1000s of years, planting it with palm trees, abusing the heck out of the land and leaving it dead and depleted after 25 yrs doesn't sound very neutral to me. Despite the scale of the these operations, the current annual production of palm oil from Indonesia would satisfy the current US oil demand for 4 days. Given that palm oil is 100 times more area efficient than soy, and 300 times than corn, you can quickly start to get a sense of just what kind of massive consumption of resources would be required to shift our current consumption to vegetable oil. There are relatively clean, sustainable ways to produce biofuels, but there is currently no economic incentive to use them. This issue probably tosses the economic security back into play as well. Whose going to pay US growers $3 a gallon for corn or canola oil when you can buy palm oil from SE Asia for $1.30? There's a nice stable part of the world to be dependant on :blink:

    To call SVO, WVO, or even biodiesel "carbon nuetral" seems to me to be pretty misleading. Right up there with buying carbon offsets :) (not green energy credits, the we'll plant a tree somewhere in the amazon and offset your entire carbon footprint for $10 kind). Its probably still better carbon wise than gasoline, but does it make up for all its other problems with enough margin to justify driving a 15mpg vehicle?

    I'm glad that on some level you realize this and drive your Hummer as little as possible B) Now I just have to figure out what to do about my D#mn Land Rover :rolleyes:

    Rob
     
  18. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rob Smith @ Sep 13 2007, 03:49 PM) [snapback]512124[/snapback]</div>


    All I can say is: Algae! Look it up.

    Anyway, I'm not sure what percentage of commercial and military traffic is diesel dependent, but must be in the 90s. Biodiesel is the cleaner alternative to that. If they all convert to biodiesel, the planet will be cleaner. That whole Biodiesel powered Hummer is cleaner than Prius thing is silly. I like saying it, but whether or not it's true I don't know. Probably isn't. But nevertheless, biodiesel is a good alternative. One of many. Viva the Hybrid, Viva Biodiesel, Viva the EV, Hydrogen, etc. All good stuff and when they are all implemented instead of dirty petrol, things will be good for everyone, except for Chavez, Ahmadinejad and Cheney (Oops, now I'm really gonna get in trouble).
     
  19. PriusOwner004

    PriusOwner004 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    191
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rob Smith @ Sep 13 2007, 03:49 PM) [snapback]512124[/snapback]</div>


    All I can say is: Algae! Look it up.

    Anyway, I'm not sure what percentage of commercial and military traffic is diesel dependent, but must be in the 90s. Biodiesel is the cleaner alternative to that. If they all convert to biodiesel, the planet will be cleaner. That whole Biodiesel powered Hummer is cleaner than Prius thing is silly. I like saying it, but whether or not it's true I don't know. Probably isn't. But nevertheless, biodiesel is a good alternative. One of many. Viva the Hybrid, Viva Biodiesel, Viva the EV, Hydrogen, etc. All good stuff and when they are all implemented instead of dirty petrol, things will be good for everyone, except for Chavez, Ahmadinejad and Cheney (Oops, now I'm really gonna get in trouble).
     
  20. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    BTW, just to show I feel your pain....

    Despite all the concerns voiced above, if LR ever got off their rear ends and reintroduced the Defender tdi over hear, I'd have a _really_ hard time not buying one and running it on biodiesel. :unsure:

    http://www.landrover.co.uk/gb/en/Vehicles/...er_overview.htm

    There were serious rumors going around about a 2008 relaunch, but I have a feeling the new diesel requirements may have killed it (although it looks like the new model does have a crd vs tdi.....).

    Rob