1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Greenspan says Iraq war largely due to oil...

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by burritos, Sep 17, 2007.

  1. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296938,00.html

    What a friggin idiot. Doesn't he know that it was largely due to WMD's. Oh wait I mean for spreading democracy. Oh wait it was because we hate their freedom, no wait that's them. Unfortunately this tool has been running the fed for what? 18 years? How'd he get away with this?
     
  2. hycamguy07

    hycamguy07 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    2,707
    3
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    (Sigh) Trolling again.... :(
     
  3. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(hycamguy07 @ Sep 17 2007, 11:27 AM) [snapback]513746[/snapback]</div>
    While Greenspan might look a bit like a troll, I doubt he was trying to troll.
     
  4. boulder_bum

    boulder_bum Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    1,371
    38
    0
    Location:
    Castle Rock, CO
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    It's interesting at times to see how the overseas press reports on the issues. I remember reading one BBC story interviewing some fairly important Washington oil types who spoke pretty freely about oil's influence on the war. The American press doesn't really touch those sort of interviews/stories.

    Has anyone seen the movie "The Insider"? It's actually a pretty alarming portrayal of how American media can be manipulated by corporations. It's about a former big tabacco executive who interviewed with 60 Minutes just to have his story censored for fear a multi-billion dollar lawsuit that threatened the sale of CBS to Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

    Essentially, 60 Minutes was asked to sacrifice its journalistic integrity for money's sake, at least until building pressure and a change of circumstances allowed them to air the story.

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/smoke/cron.html

    Anyhoo, if we went to war over the threat of WMD's we would have went to war with North Korea instead, and if the war were about freedom and justice our soldiers would be in Darfur.
     
  5. Darwood

    Darwood Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    5,259
    268
    1
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    "about oil" is just too broad of term to make as a blanket statement though.

    It was more about our own use of oil, then about Iraqi oil per say.
    As in, we either power down our use of the stuff, or we find a way to militarily maintain a presence in the middle of the world's oil patch. Without some presence (since the Saudi's don't want us based there anymore) we would quickly lose control of the oil markets and lose our happy motoring utopia.

    Option A (reduce consumption) never seems to sell too well and option B (keep gun pointed at spigot) cannot be stated public, so they obfuscate it. The folly was that 100's of billions of dollars could have gone a long way to ensuring our energy independance at home. An investment that is inevitable either way.

    Instead, the middle east, the military, and the corporations that sell to them get to continue the gravy train and the oil companies can keep the status quo...For a little while.
     
  6. EricGo

    EricGo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    1,805
    0
    0
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM (SouthWest US)
    Right, Darwood. The only thing I will add is that continuing meddling by the US into internal affairs of the oil patch adds fuel [sic] to the fire of local extremism, that then is directed at the US.
     
  7. huskers

    huskers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    2,544
    2,486
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    A lot of people have been saying that over the years...when Greenspan speaks people listen !!! What a mess we have gotten ourselves into. Someone needs to study history.
     
  8. priussoris

    priussoris New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    1,005
    4
    0
    Whats going to happen is this as it has in the past...
    The government will bail out the loan companies since people are defaulting etc.. The republicans are crying were losing money, and a Democrat will win the presidential election and then the republicdumbs will say "see you can't do any better." Leave us the mess they made.

    But the fact is and was IT WAS BETTER BEFORE ANY BUSH got in.

    Even Greenspan knows it and he still votes republican I guess all things/people don't get better with age
     
  9. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Greenspan also said the tax cuts should NEVER have been extended/renewed.

    Greenspan is a Libertarian Republican. He is critical of Bush II and forgiving of Clinton. Why? Because he's only looking at fiscal matters and the economy.

    Greenspan faults Bush over spending.

    "He says he began to write the book on Feb. 1, 2006, the day his successor — Ben Bernanke — took over. A caption under a photo of Bernanke's swearing-in has Greenspan saying he was "very comfortable leaving the post in the hands of such an experienced successor."

    The ex-Fed chief writes that he regrets the loss of fiscal discipline under Bush.

    "`Deficits don't matter,' to my chagrin, became part of Republicans' rhetoric."

    Greenspan long has argued that persistent budget deficits pose a danger to the economy over the long run.

    At the Fed, he repeatedly urged Congress to put back in place a budget mechanism that requires any new spending increases or tax cuts to be offset by spending reductions or tax increases.

    Large projected surpluses were the basis for Bush's $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax cut approved in the summer of 2001.

    Budget experts projected the government would run a whopping $5.6 trillion worth of surpluses over the subsequent decade after the cuts. Those surpluses, the basis for Bush's campaign promises of a tax cut, never materialized.

    "In the revised world of growing deficits, the goals were no longer entirely appropriate," Greenspan noted. Bush, he said, stuck with his campaign promises anyway. "Most troubling to me was the readiness of both Congress and the administration to abandon fiscal discipline.""
     
  10. Swanny1172

    Swanny1172 New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    666
    1
    0
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Well no s**t, Sherlock.
     
  11. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Swanny1172 @ Sep 18 2007, 11:48 AM) [snapback]514059[/snapback]</div>
    Thankyou, I was going to write exactly that but have been copping some heat for language, you saved me rewording that.

    Greenspan only said what we already knew. Government public reasonings weren't fooling anyone.
     
  12. wbuttler

    wbuttler New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    85
    0
    0
    I have a hard time with individuals
    who write books expressing the truth
    AFTER THEY RETIRE!!
    There's been several individuals involved
    in/with/around this administration in one way or another who are
    now suddenly speaking honestly...where was this honesty when we
    needed it......it reminds me of chuck colson "finding" jesus on his way
    into the pen after watergate....

    Keep your retirement truth books, i refuse to buy them
    I'd have like to have heard the truth while these people were in power.

    Froley
     
  13. priussoris

    priussoris New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    1,005
    4
    0
    Well put Froley!!!

    We will never really hear the truth until it's too late
     
  14. bigmahma

    bigmahma New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    226
    0
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    It will not be the last time we goto war to protect american interests, American Economy and American Families.


    I hope we have the balls to do it again and again in the future... Lest we become a 2nd or 3rd rate country.
     
  15. Darwood

    Darwood Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    5,259
    268
    1
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    bigmahma
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    J


    Here fishy fishy....
     
  16. fshagan

    fshagan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    1,766
    4
    0
    Location:
    Noneofyourbusiness, CA
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Froley @ Sep 19 2007, 08:06 PM) [snapback]515088[/snapback]</div>
    Re-check your facts on Chuck Colson. He "found" Jesus back DURING Watergate, prior to his prison sentence, and has since devoted his life to his Prison Fellowship ministry. He is a winner of the Templeton Prize for advancement in religion, and donated all of it to Prison Fellowship.

    "Finding Jesus" didn't spare Colson anything. He paid the full price, didn't contest it, and remains faithful to his conversion today, nearly 40 years later. Using him as an example of a "deathbed confession" is disingenious; he has done more for his fellow man since his conviction than most people.

    And, he never wrote a "tell all" about Watergate.
     
  17. n8kwx

    n8kwx Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    236
    1
    0
    Location:
    Arlington Heights, IL - NW Chicago Suburb
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(priussoris @ Sep 20 2007, 06:47 AM) [snapback]515185[/snapback]</div>
    I haven't bought his book, but from a lot of the quotes I've read, it sounds like he DID speak his mind to the Presidents in office during his time as Fed Chairman.

    It is just that the Bush's in particular didn't like to hear what he had to say. And didn't do as he suggested. Clinton was smart enough to just go along for the ride. (and to be fair, he didn't have a recession to worry about).

    I don't think it is fair to group him with those would "didn't speak the truth until they retired".
     
  18. skruse

    skruse Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    1,454
    97
    0
    Location:
    Coloma CA - Sierra Nevada
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
    The old myths have not yet died, and the new myths are not yet fully accepted.
     
  19. mojo

    mojo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    4,519
    390
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    Greenspan intentionally burst the tech bubble and crashed the stock market by relentlessly raising interest rates .He timed the crash to perfectly to coincide with the 2000 elections.
    IMO he was manipulating the election for Bush.
    Then after Bush was elected we got record low rates .
    I have a feeling Bernanke is now easing rates to help prop the shaky Bush economy just to pay the piper after the next election.
     
  20. Darwood

    Darwood Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    5,259
    268
    1
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mojo @ Sep 20 2007, 06:24 PM) [snapback]515503[/snapback]</div>
    I dont' agree with that. The tech bubble got overbloated by Y2K work that had to be done. When Y2K came and went without much effect, all that work that was being done for the Y2K fixed evaporated, letting the air out of the bubble. This had far more effect on the tech industry than interest rates.