1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

A Disturbing Absence

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by airportkid, Oct 4, 2007.

  1. McShemp

    McShemp New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    371
    4
    0
    Location:
    SA, TX
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    The prominant numbers that I've seen thrown around online were: 1) $85k as the upper income limit and 2) children up to 25 years of age would be covered.
     
  2. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(PA Prius @ Oct 5 2007, 11:56 AM) [snapback]521773[/snapback]</div>
    No problem, thank you for the apology. i tend to be sensitive about that name seeing how its has been abused over time - its so well worn it has affected lots of peoples reasoning.

    Have a nice weekend.

    David
     
  3. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Bottom line? There is never enough money for health or education of US citizens. There seems to be no limit to how much we can spend in destroying or financially aiding OTHER countries.

    Hell... what's so important about having healthy and educated kids? I mean... how do they contribute to the bottom line this quarter?
     
  4. roryjr

    roryjr Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    227
    0
    0
    Location:
    Warrenton, NC
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(McShemp @ Oct 5 2007, 12:40 PM) [snapback]521817[/snapback]</div>
    Thank you. Even the $63,000 mentioned earlier is far from poor. And if you are 25 and don't have health insurance, here's a hint. McDonald's is always hiring and and they have insurance available.

    The cigarette tax. It doesn't matter if an industry or the consumers of that industry are hurt if liberals don't like that industry. Someone said that it would not cost taxpayers anything. Are smokers not tax payers, too? Then it was said that the tax may reduce smoking. Wonderful. As smoking declines, so does the revenue from the new tax. The program will not reduce (government programs never do). Now where will the funding come from. From tax payers (smokers and non smokers alike).

    Ya just gotta think things through.
     
  5. airportkid

    airportkid Will Fly For Food

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    2,191
    538
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    There are many legitimate criticisms of the bill: income ceiling too "high", funds come from taxation of a "sin" commodity, etc.

    But name ANY bill in legislative history that didn't have some stench in its wrinkles; they ALL stink in some particular. What's that wise adage again about never wanting to see how sausages and laws are made? We learn to hold our nose and look at the larger picture (if we're man enough to set aside partisan pretense), and generally set our aim toward noble and humanitarian outcomes, even if the methods aren't how WE would have designed the levers and cogs of execution.

    This bill would have increased access to medical care for children. So long as it accomplishes this end without bombing cities, or dispatching bands of assassins, or impoverishing anyone (and it's hard to see how this bill even so much as inconveniences anyone, even smokers), quibbling over the flaws of its methods is churlish, to say the least.

    What carries the churlishness to heights of extreme, immoral outright obscenity, is that the administration that finds this bill so egregious it resorts to exercising a privilege it has only used THREE times previously in SEVEN years, is the same administration that continues to profligately waste hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of treasure in a failed endeavor that has NO attainable noble or humanitarian outcome, nor ever had one.

    The worst satan the human imagination could ever contrive would be a trifling amateur next to the pros that presently occupy and defile the Oval Office.

    Mark Baird
    Alameda CA
     
  6. EricGo

    EricGo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    1,805
    0
    0
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM (SouthWest US)
    Isn't this the same bozo and political party that gave us Medicare part D, lest consumers try to shop for cheaper medicines outside the US ?
    Anxiety over socialized medicine my nice person.

    And in other news, bozo wants another 200 billion US$ to pursue his wartime pleasures.
     
  7. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roryjr @ Oct 6 2007, 10:42 PM) [snapback]522346[/snapback]</div>
    Oh good lord, you don't live in the same country as I do do you?

    $85k with kids can be tough to find full coverage for health insurance and those kids fall into a gap and can't get care.

    Cigarette Tax...yes smokers are sometimes (though certainly not always in my experience) tax payers, but unless you're completely obtuse you'd realize that the 'tax' I was refering to was income tax...thus not penalizing people for doing a good thing (working for a living) but penalizing those who choose to do an unhealthy and unnecessary thing (smoking)...a complete luxury.

    And if smoking does decline and revenue does as well then I'll applaud the day b/c it'll mean that fewer kids are being treated for illness related to secondary smoke exposure (do a little research on allergies, otitis media and asthma and its costs due to 2nd hand smoke exposure), not to mention the fact that future health care costs that we tax payers will be responsible for due to heart disease, lung disease, vascular disease, strokes and even lung and GI cancers will be dramatically reduced and those savings will FAR exceed any lost tax revenue from the cigarettes.
     
  8. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roryjr @ Oct 6 2007, 08:42 PM) [snapback]522346[/snapback]</div>
    McD has health insurance "available"? Meaning, they will sell it to you? And if a McD's burger-flipper takes them up on that and buys their health insurance, how much of his salary does he then take home? $50 a week?

    Health insurance is "available" to anyone with the money to pay for it. The whole point is that on a minimum-wage job like McD's (or Walmart!) you don't have enough money to pay for it.

    I actually agree that the cigarette tax is the wrong way to pay for health care. Cigarettes should be outlawed, just like cocaine. While tobacco's mood-altering effects are unlike those of cocaine, its addictive properties are equal or greater, and its overall damage to society is greater. Alternatively, tobacco should be taxed at an astronomical level to stop people from using it, and health care should be funded from general revenues, and should be universal.

    But that is not a reason to veto the bill. The bill should be signed into law. And then the prez should pressure Congress to expand it and change the funding to a sustainable source.

    Vetoing this bill was the act of a barbarian.
     
  9. EricGo

    EricGo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    1,805
    0
    0
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM (SouthWest US)
    A politician said s(he) was amazed at how much it is going to cost for this program, and I must agree. I don't mention this as ammunition against SCHIP per se, as much as further evidence that US healthcare is so, so backwards.

    I just wish the money was spent on preventive health, reinstatement of compulsory athletics and removal of junk food from our schools, rather than psychiatric bandages and obesity.
     
  10. paulccullen

    paulccullen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    276
    3
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Even Jon Stewart was left speechless. When commenting on this issue, all he could say was "... Pass"
     
  11. rudiger

    rudiger Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    696
    45
    0
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daniel @ Oct 7 2007, 09:04 AM) [snapback]522410[/snapback]</div>
    Anyone who wants healthcare can get great medical treatment at their local VA by joining the military and fighting in the 'war on terror'. Bush sure isn't going to veto any funding in that area.

    Healthcare for poor American non-military slackers? Piss on 'em. As someone else already pointed out, they can get all the healthcare they need by paying for it at their minimum-wage McJobs.
     
  12. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rudiger @ Oct 7 2007, 09:37 AM) [snapback]522428[/snapback]</div>
    Yea, all those children will be signing right up...great plan.

    And there is no way you can work at McDonalds, pay health insurance for your family while feeding and sheltering them in anything more than a shanty house and oatmeal. Now that's the American dream.
     
  13. rudiger

    rudiger Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    696
    45
    0
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 7 2007, 10:40 AM) [snapback]522429[/snapback]</div>
    Exactly. And just think, those that sign up will be the strongest since the weak will already have died off long ago. The US will have the best <strike>Aryan</strike> military, ever.

    And who needs medical healthcare, anyway? Isn't Bush's whole constituency rooted in the ideology that modern science is bunk? It should come as no surprise that Bush is going to veto anything that even remotely supports the idea of modern medical science. Faith-based initiatives, you know.

    Maybe if there was a bill that advocated returning to applying leeches for medicinal purposes, Bush might consider signing that one.


    In a medieval, feudal class society comprised of lords, freemen, and serfs, that is the dream. See above comment about leeches...
     
  14. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rudiger @ Oct 7 2007, 07:37 AM) [snapback]522428[/snapback]</div>
    Where you been living lately? Health care at the VA is a travesty! The VA is the worst health care system in the country. And the Bush administration has consistently denied it funding. Apparently, once you've served your country and are out of active service, you can die in the gutter for all G.W.B. cares.

    I had a friend in Fargo who is a Vietnam-era veteran. (Yes, he fought in Vietnam as a grunt.) Two or three years ago (when I was still living in Fargo) he and I both had flexible sigmoidoscopy (sp?) procedures within a few months of each other. I had mine at Meritcare, the local private (not-for-profit, I think) hospital. He had his at the Fargo VA. For mine, there was a specialist MD present throughout the procedure. The procedure is uncomfortable, but not too painful if done properly, as mine was. For my friend, at the VA, there was only a P.A. (physician's assistant) present. They screwed up the procedure and he wound up in the emergency room and nearly died. There is no excuse for screwing up this relatively straightforward procedure.

    The VA is one very good reason why nobody in his/her right mind should ever join the armed forces.
     
  15. JSH

    JSH Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    2,605
    140
    0
    Location:
    PDX
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(roryjr @ Oct 6 2007, 10:42 PM) [snapback]522346[/snapback]</div>
    You have no idea of reality do you? I will repeat it again, the cap of $63,000 does not apply to all families and all states. That would be the maximum a family of 4 in a high cost of living state such as California could make and still be eligible for SCHIP.

    Lets take California. When I looked at transferring to the San Bernardino area in 2000 the average rent for a 1 bedroom apartment was $1200 per month. That was 7 years ago. When I visited my sister-in-law in LA this year I looked online at reality prices. The cheapest single family house I found was $425,000 and is was 800 square feet, 2 bedrooms, 1 bath and listed as a good fixer-upper project. Someone with a McJob in California is McPoor and will not be supporting a family let alone buying McDonald's insurance.

    Someone living in North Carolina may do just fine making $63K per year. In fact my brother lives in Raleigh and I believe his 3 bed, 2 bath, 1400 square foot house (new construction) was only about $120,000.

    The cap of 25 years old is for dependents that are enrolled in college, just like many private insurance providers currently allow. For example, my wife and I were both covered under our respective parents employer provided insurance until we graduated from college at the age of 23.

    Paying for this by upping the cigarette tax is stupid. However, this is a bi-partisan bill and that was the only way that house Republicans would sign onto the bill. It was Bush's own party that insisted that this new spending be covered by a new sin tax instead of coming out of the general fund as supported by both parties in the Senate and House Democrats.
     
  16. EricGo

    EricGo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    1,805
    0
    0
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM (SouthWest US)
    Why ?
     
  17. rudiger

    rudiger Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    696
    45
    0
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daniel @ Oct 7 2007, 12:29 PM) [snapback]522446[/snapback]</div>
    Ask any Bushie and they'll tell you that treatment at the VA is the best care available, anywhere. All those VA horror stories are just 'isolated incidents'. Ergo, no need for Bush to sign a healthcare bill for all those indigent, thieving, welfare bastards when they can simply join the military for their great, 'free' VA healthcare. They even get free clothes, food, and housing. And they get paid (with big bonuses), on top of all that. Such a deal.

    Of course, they also get to go fight their questionable wars for them, too, which isn't really such a great thing, but, hey, they knew what they were doing when they signed up.
     
  18. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jhinton @ Oct 5 2007, 10:24 AM) [snapback]521744[/snapback]</div>

    Well, there you go.

    New York and California didn't vote for him. He said he'd make sure they paid the price.

    Petty Vendictive Dictator.

    Although I prefer to use the term Moron since his mental faculties are so limited he can't see the big picture. The man DOESN'T READ. Not books. Not newspapers.

    BTW why did you feed Doh-Berman? You gave him what he wanted. If he's really a Doctor he can find the answer himself. In fact, if he was really a Doctor he should have known exactly what this bill entailed before it even got to the President's desk. I'm a teacher and I know what the education bills entail when they get to the President's desk. And if he vetoes any, I know the reasons.

    Just another reason I think Doh-Berman isn't a Doctor and is jerking all of your chains.
     
  19. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(EricGo @ Oct 7 2007, 09:39 AM) [snapback]522449[/snapback]</div>
    A cigarette tax is a bad way to finance health care because we should be eliminating tobacco, not depending on the people addicted to it for revenue.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rudiger @ Oct 7 2007, 09:42 AM) [snapback]522452[/snapback]</div>
    I see. You were being sarcastic. I missed that the first time around. Sorry about that. And thanks for the clarification.
     
  20. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daniel @ Oct 7 2007, 08:00 PM) [snapback]522560[/snapback]</div>
    I agree that that would be an ideal solution, but it's also an unrealistic goal in the short term...I think you'd agree with that.
    We can pine for a utopia, or we can work in a step-wise progression and actually accomplish something.