1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Toyota loses Prius patent appeal

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by JackDodge, May 12, 2008.

  1. JackDodge

    JackDodge Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    2,366
    4
    0
    Location:
    Bloomfield Hills, MI
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    story

    "The U.S. Supreme Court let stand a $4.3 million award against Toyota Motor Corp. for using another company's patented technology in gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, including the top-selling Prius, Bloomberg News reported today.

    "Toyota also may have to pay Paice royalties for future vehicles it produces using the disputed technology. The appeals court told a trial judge to revisit his order that Toyota pay $25 for every Prius, Highlander and Lexus RX400h sold. The appellate panel refused to block sales of the infringing vehicles.

    "The disputed technology involves a microprocessor that accepts torque information from both the internal combustion engine and electric motor."
     
  2. FBear

    FBear Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    355
    23
    0
    Location:
    Maplewood, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Four
    I just finished reading all 41 pages of the findings by the three district judges in Texas. Paice must have had it lawyers shop 'til they dropped to find a sympathetic court to present the original case. Both sides did their best to obfuscate and present what it wanted the jury to hear. I think Paice got more than what it deserved $5.00 per car for basically doing nothing. The case basically revolved around equivalents: Paice saying that Toyota's drive system was equal to what they had described in their patents but not the same. This is why most other countries do not follow our precedents in their courts because we reward people for doing nothing.
     
  3. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    641
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    I agree, unfortunately since most hybrid cars are sold in the US, this will tend to penalize Toyota and reward Paice.

    After wading through the docs, I had a headache
     
  4. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,075
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Our intellectual property system is broken.

    Tom
     
  5. priusenvy

    priusenvy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    1,765
    14
    0
    Location:
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Do a search on Google, you'll find that there is a district in Texas where patent trolls love to file for the following two reasons:

    1) A judge that likes to "fast track" intellectual property cases, and who almost always sides with patent holder
    2) A very large population of retired, poorly educated, elderly people who do not understand technology who end up on the jury

    Here's are a couple links to start: Techdirt: Why Patent Trolls Worldwide Love Marshall, Texas and Technology Review: A Haven for Patent Pirates

    If you work in high-tech you should probably already be familiar with what goes on there.
     
  6. fan-atic

    fan-atic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    59
    0
    0
    Location:
    Holliston, MA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    HTML:
    [quote="priusenvy, post: 614987"]Do a search on Google,
     you'll find that there is a district in Texas where
     patent trolls love to file for the following two reasons:
     
    1) A judge that likes to "fast track" intellectual
     property cases, and who almost always sides 
    with patent holder
    2) A very large population of retired, poorly 
    educated, elderly people who do not understand 
    technology who end up on the jury
    
    Definitely sounds like Hillary country. Maybe she'll retire there.
     
  7. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Is there avenue to appeal?
     
  8. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    The first ones up against the wall have to be the lawyers.
    .
    _H*
     
  9. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    our litigious society on the job!!
     
  10. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,075
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Put them on the B ship.

    Tom
     
  11. Bill Merchant

    Bill Merchant absit invidia

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    4,096
    82
    13
    Location:
    USA | Oregon | Portland area | 97004 |
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Nah, that's Bush country!
     
  12. yosh

    yosh New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    1
    0
    0
    Location:
    DC
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    i didnt read the decision, too tired...but actually having an idea and going through the patent prosecution process to actually be granted a patent does not sound like being rewarded for doing nothing...now whether Paice's patent is broad enough that toyota is infringing...you gotta look at the patent.

     
  13. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    And yet the individual who actually holds ALL major patents on both gasoline and plug-in hybrids has asked for nothing - though EVERY hybrid on the road violates his patents. Patents that he has held, in some cases, since the 1970's.
     
  14. tkil

    tkil New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    158
    2
    0
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    If he has in fact had those patents since the 1970s, then they're all expired anyway (at least in the USA, which has a 17-year (maybe 20-year?) limit on the patent monopoly).

    Not that I'm defending patent trolls, but it's a fine line between rewarding inventors (both individual and corporate), yet keeping development free enough so that the state of the art can progress.

    (I work as a computer programmer, and software patents are an icky icky thing. 17-year lifespans might have made sense when it would take months if not years for an idea to make it from NYC to the west coast; now that it gets there in milliseconds with zero cost for copying, I'm not so sure...)
     
  15. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Only some are from that far back - most are far more current - and the big-selling hybrids (hmmm, what would that be???) didn't just start using the IP today, of course.

    The main reason that nothing has happened in this regard is because he does NOT wish to stifle what is currently happening. It is a tough thing. The stuff he developed didn't come for free, of course. It is basically his life's work.
     
  16. cruizerstylin

    cruizerstylin New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    15
    1
    1
    Location:
    Somewhere in Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
  17. FBear

    FBear Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    355
    23
    0
    Location:
    Maplewood, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Four
    The problem with the Paice's patent was that the application was amended just around the time Toyota came out with the Prius Gen I. Prior to that it was just a general set of statements about car that can run on dual power sources through a single transmission set up. No diagrams, no specifics. They amended it when the car was produced. So as far as I am concerned if I were on that jury, I would have flipped them a nickel for some nice thoughts, as they really did not invent anything but the vague possibility of a hybrid car. I guess the writers from Star Wars and Star Trek should patent their space ships just in case someone make anything similar.
     
  18. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    First dumb question:

    Why can lawyers pick counties and courts to file? If I file a small claims, I have to do it in the jurisdiction of my address. Where does Paice have their corporate offices? They should be filing in the closest court to that address.
     
  19. dogfriend

    dogfriend Human - Animal Hybrid

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    7,512
    1,188
    0
    Location:
    Carmichael, CA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Yes, it is beyond broken when companies can sit on the sidelines and wait for others to produce something tangible, then extor^H^H^H^H^H extract money for having a similar idea. They don't have to attempt to do anything with the idea, they can just wait for someone else to do it.

    Originally, the purpose of the patent laws were to promote sharing of technology while providing some protection for the original inventor. Now the laws are perverted so that companies buy up patents and then wait to ambush other companies when a product is successful. And, if you are a individual inventor, you probably don't have the means to protect your valid patents anyway. So, the lawyers and the patent trolls are the only ones that benefit in the current system.

    The whole thing needs to be scrapped and redone.
     
  20. priusenvy

    priusenvy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    1,765
    14
    0
    Location:
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    It's even worse than that. Often, the company that's suing is not the company that filed the patent. There are companies whose sole business is buying up seemingly worthless patents from other companies who are liquidating their assets, and then go around suing as many companies as they can for infringing on the purchased patent, hoping that one in ten might settle. The result is a nice payday whenever the defendant decides it's cheaper to settle for a few hundred thousand dollars than to go to court.