1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

New Ford Focus commercial targets Prius

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by Rybold, Jun 15, 2008.

  1. morpheusx

    morpheusx Professor Chaos

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    1,555
    81
    0
    Location:
    Akron, OH
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    and no one has mentioned that with the Focus that it comes with an air pump instead of a spare tire standard. The spare is an option.
     
  2. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    New base model Prius here costs $37,400 RRP and has since the 2004 came out. I paid $24,900 for my 2004 about a year ago with 61,000 kilometres on the odometer. My 2004 Prius gets as good or better fuel economy as a 2007 or 2008 model and it cost $12,500 less and my price includes on road costs but the new price I quoted does not so add another $1,500ish to that.
     
  3. Winston

    Winston Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    614
    20
    0
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, California
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    There are just too many subjective factors to make it strictly a financial decision. However, as noted, to be most accurate all costs should be brought forward to determine a "net present value". I think the Prius is "The best midsize car" sold, by a long shot. BUT it doesn't handle like an Audi A4 Quatro in the snow, I cant park it as easily as a SMART car, it's initial cost is much higher than a Focus (especially in the current market), and on and on. The financials and TCO is only one part of the equation. Getting an accurate TCO requires a lot of assumptions, and everyone can argue about every assumption.
     
  4. cobraz

    cobraz Prius Pirate

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    81
    26
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius
    Model:
    III
    It's a FORD ... "Fix Or Repair Daily"

    I have owned many in the past... they lost me as customer years ago - until they meet or reach Toyota's reputation.

    Proud Prius owner... they forgot to also mention the time the Focus will be off the road with maintenance and repairs..vs the Prius.

    Hands down Prius wins... as for the $ 7,000.00 difference.. let's see who's car in 5 years is worth more a Ford or a Toyota...

    I rest my case... "In Toyota we trust"
     
  5. rpiereck

    rpiereck Regenerator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    289
    3
    0
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    I remember my dad's old Lincoln Continental (basically a luxury Ford): he bought it in 1990 when Lexus was new and it was all the rage, so everybody who had luxury cars were selling them to buy Lexus. My dad bought the used 1989 Lincoln for 50% of the price of a brand one at a Lexus dealership. The car had a 5 year warranty, and my dad did all the required maintenance, but it was like a time bomb: in 1994, one or two months after the warranty expired EVERYTHING started going bad the Continental: transmission, engine, power steering, the electronic suspension, the power seats, etc. Talk about planned obsolescence, Ford has it down to a science! My dad ended up taking it to a Toyota dealership and traded it for a Toyota Avalon, and kept that car until 2004, no major problems. That was the worst experience we had with American cars, but others came close. By the way, the Toyota dealership gave him $4000 for his 5 year old Lincoln. He got over $6000 when he traded his 10-year old Avalon.
     
  6. TonyPSchaefer

    TonyPSchaefer Your Friendly Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    14,816
    2,498
    66
    Location:
    Far-North Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    As long as we're comparing numbers, take a look at this:

    Improving a 10MPG vehicle to a 12MPG vehicle is a 20% improvement. Averaging 12,000 miles annually, you reduce your consumption by 200 gallons. (12,000/10 = 1,200 versus 12,000/12 = 1,000).

    Improving a 30MPG vehicle to a 35MPG vehicle is a greater mileage improvement but still only a 16% savings. In one year, you only reduce your consumption by only 57 gallons (12,000/30 = 400 versus 12,000/35 = 343).

    But that's not fair, Tony, you are saying. It's not fair because I didn't improve the 30MPG car by 20% like I did the guzzler. So I'll bump the 30MPG by 20% to make you happy. A 20% improvement on a 30MPG vehicle is 36MPG. (12,000/30 = 400 versus 12,000/36 = 333) This is a reduction of only 67 gallons.

    Hands down, every time, if you truly want to reduce the amount of gasoline consumed you only need to bump the guzzlers a few percentages. A very similar argument was made by the illustrious Bob Lutz to illustrate why GM is taking the more responsible path to oil reduction by improving the mileage of their guzzlers by minor increments.
     
  7. Bryan5

    Bryan5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2007
    40
    0
    0
    Location:
    MS
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    I thought Ford reliability issues had been resolved. I remember a commercial not too long ago by Ford saying "Our quality is now equal with Toyota's." I'm assuming quality meant reliability. Well, I'm glad people are choosing small cars over SUVs that they won't fully utilize most of the time.
     
  8. pdhenry

    pdhenry It's HEEERE!

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    406
    15
    0
    Location:
    PA
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    I'd think quality = fewer build defects (doors, hoods aligned correctly, etc) more than it means long-term reliability.
     
  9. rfruth

    rfruth Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    394
    8
    24
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Ford's initial quality may = Toyota but give um time ... (FORD = driver returns on foot ((backwards)))
     
  10. Squint

    Squint New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    66
    0
    0
    Initial or apparent quality is only important when you're renting a car.
     
  11. donee

    donee New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    2,956
    197
    0
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Hi All,

    I basically like Ford cars. But, they just let the purchasing people get out of hand. The crap parts they are putting in these cars is going to be their downfall. They need better specifications on everything. Which is why a Ford hybrid might break with the past. No more who can make the cheapest alternator, lets buy that one! It ll be a custom MG1 that does that job, and there will be no wheelin dealin to see who has the least service life part to put in the car.

    My Tempo had the alternators going every 9 months. And the steering rack was mounted on a part that slotted (too think sheet metal) due to the back and forth action of the steering loads. The trans needed work at 75 K miles, and that cost 2K back in the 1990's.
     
  12. 71Corolla

    71Corolla New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    17
    1
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    No matter what the stats say, all you have to do to see the REAL quality of a car is work on it. Having worked on many, many cars I can say without a doubt that Ford is no where near Toyota. It's not even close. The quality of design is not there in just about every component in the vehicle, major and minor. There is no contest, and it is easy to see why the older a car gets, the more reliable a Toyota becomes compared to other cars.

    And this goes back many, many years. Even in the early 70's, looking at the fit and finish of a Toyota vs. Ford, GM and Chrysler. The fit of the body panels, the gaps between the body and the doors, trunk lid etc. The american cars very often had shims and spacers, and absolutely horrific variations in gaps between body panels. The Toyota's had very very good tolerances, comparatively. Same goes for the engine, the tolerances on the Toyota engines were far, far exceeding the american cars. Not to mention the use of semi exotic materials at the time, forged pistons, crank and rods. The downfall was the poor quality steel Toyota used, it was not refined correctly and rusted like mad as a result.

    Granted, technology has improved tremendously in American cars in many respects, but quality runs in the DNA of a car maker. Ford and others are still no Toyota. And the sure way you can tell which vehicle is #1 is how many times the competitor puts their name in advertising. The Prius has to be the most obvious target, all you hear is, better than the Prius, when it comes out it will better than The Prius. Only problem is the Prius is a moving target, by the time you get close the new model will be out and the cycle will start all over again.
     
  13. Testm0nkey

    Testm0nkey New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    44
    0
    0
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    One of the family's other car is a Ford Focus hatchback, manual transmission absolutely equipped with NOTHING (the way to go to get full efficiency in a vehicle imo). I mean it doesn't have cruise control, power windows, its baseline baseline. The new Focus comes with some nice touches like the Bluetooth etc.

    I can't even remember what we paid for it $8,000? Maybe closer to $9 after taxes/warranty brand spanking new. BESIDES the 08 Prius (what we do not have yet) the focus is my favorite car. I like it more than the 05' Prius we also have. I like the zippy feeling that comes from an incredibly light, small, manny. Driving the way I *like* to drive - they get relatively the same FE.

    I've never had a problem with cars/breakdowns/need for replacement parts in the long line of Fords, Chryslers and Pontiacs we've owned. It really is how well you take care of a vehicle, even the typically crappier American cars. I've driven a Chrysler New Yorker (typically crappy cars) into the ground and at over 200,000 miles it's made the initial cost well worth it.

    If the current focus was a hybrid hands down would have gotten it. But as of now the Prius is the most interesting car on the market! Just waiting for American car companies to catch up and make the race more interesting!
     
  14. tenderloin

    tenderloin New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    1
    0
    0
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    CA Focus have a PZEV engine which as you know is very clean burning
     
  15. jammin012

    jammin012 The man behind The Man

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    510
    6
    0
    Location:
    Cali
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius

    Euro versions always look better. Take the Puma and the Cougar for instance. Puma MUCH nicer.
     
  16. MsDaisy

    MsDaisy Goddess of Green-land

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    121
    0
    0
    Location:
    Birmingham AL
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius

    Yep...Jim Skinner Ford, another reason for never owning a Ford.
     
  17. Yak18

    Yak18 Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    92
    2
    0
    Location:
    Southeast
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    All one has to do is read consumer reports car issue.
     
  18. cobraz

    cobraz Prius Pirate

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    81
    26
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Yes, in general I would have to agree... but remember - advertisers sometimes get favorable reviews even in Consumer Reports.
    Editors and writers can be bought.

    It is best to do your own research and talk to fellow owners and threads on the item on the Internet.

    "History can be created, but it can never be re-created." John Stiles 1947
     
  19. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    As far as I recall Consumer Reports does not accept advertising. They are funded solely on subscriptions, the intent being to keep the reviews as fair as possible.

    FWIW here are the CR/EPA numbers:

    Combined Interior Volume (cuft, highest to lowest):
    Prius:- 112
    Fit:--- 111
    Focus:- 107
    Aveo:-- 103
    Cobalt: 100

    Base MSRP (lowest to highest):
    Aveo:-- $12,020
    Fit:--- $13,950
    Cobalt: $14,225
    Focus:- $14,395
    Prius:- $21,500

    Cost to Own over 5 years (lowest to highest):
    Fit:--- $26,750
    Aveo:-- $26,750
    Prius:- $28,500
    Focus:- $31,750
    Cobalt: $31,750

    CR Overall Score: (highest to lowest):
    Prius:- 68
    Fit:--- 65
    Focus:- 65
    Cobalt: 50
    Aveo:-- 33

    Owner Satisfaction (highest to lowest):
    Prius:- 92
    Fit:--- 81
    Focus:- 55
    Cobalt: 45
    Aveo:-- 44

    CO2 Output (tons, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 4.0
    Fit:--- 6.3
    Focus:- 6.6
    Cobalt: 7.1
    Aveo:-- 7.1

    Annual Fuel Costs (lowest to highest):
    Prius:- $1328
    Fit:--- $2111
    Focus:- $2185
    Cobalt: $2356
    Aveo:-- $2356

    CO output US/CA (g/mi, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 0.1/0.1
    Fit:--- 0.3/0.3
    Aveo:-- 0.54/0.54
    Focus:- 0.8/0.3
    Cobalt: 1.2/0.6

    Nox Output US/CA
    (g/mi, lowest to highest):
    Focus:- 0.00/0.00
    Prius:- 0.01/0.01
    Cobalt: 0.02/0.00
    Aveo:-- 0.039/0.039
    Fit:--- 0.04/0.04

    NMOG Output US/CA
    (g/mi, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 0.009/0.009
    Focus:- 0.021/0.007
    Cobalt: 0.032/0.006
    Fit:--- 0.044/0.044
    Aveo:-- 0.052/0.052

    IMHO the focus is not a bad car. If I had to buy a small American car, that would probably be it. Other than that, I can't see it as any real choice compared to a Prius.

    Rob
     
  20. miscrms

    miscrms Plug Envious Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    2,076
    523
    5
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Of course its probably more fair to compare the Prius against mid-sized vehicles:

    Combined Interior Volume (cuft, highest to lowest):
    Fusion: 117
    Matrix: 116
    Prius:- 112
    Malibu: 111
    Avenger:110
    Jetta:- 107

    Base MSRP (lowest to highest):
    Matrix: $16,190
    Jetta:- $16,990 ($21,990 '09 TDI)
    Fusion: $18,135
    Avenger:$18,910
    Malibu: $19,345
    Prius:- $21,500

    Cost to Own over 5 years (lowest to highest):
    Prius:- $28,500
    Matrix: $32,500
    Malibu: $33,500
    Fusion: $33,750
    Jetta:- $36,250
    Avenger:$43,500

    CR Overall Score: (highest to lowest):
    Malibu: 77
    Matrix: 72
    Jetta:- 72
    Fusion: 69
    Prius:- 68
    Avenger:46

    Owner Satisfaction (highest to lowest):
    Prius:- 92
    Malibu: 81 (Aura)
    Fusion: 69
    Jetta:- 65
    Matrix: NR
    Avenger:NR

    CO2 Output (tons, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 4.0
    Matrix: 6.8
    Jetta:- 7.3 (6.4 '09 TDI)
    Malibu: 7.3
    Avenger:7.7
    Fusion: 8.0

    Annual Fuel Costs (lowest to highest):
    Prius:- $1,328
    Matrix: $2,264
    Malibu: $2,448
    Avenger:$2,552
    Jetta:- $2,586 ($2,132 '09 TDI)
    Fusion: $2,662

    CO output US/CA (g/mi, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 0.1/0.1
    Matrix: 0.3/0.3
    Jetta:- 0.37/0.37
    Fusion: 1.0/0.2
    Avenger:1.4/0.3
    Malibu: 2.5/2.5

    Nox Output US/CA
    (g/mi, lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 0.01/0.01
    Avenger:0.01/0.00
    Malibu: 0.01/0.01
    Jetta:- 0.029/0.029
    Matrix: 0.03/0.03
    Fusion: 0.06/0.01

    NMOG Output US/CA
    (g/mi, US lowest to highest):
    Prius:- 0.009/0.009
    Fusion: 0.014/0.007
    Matrix: 0.023/0.023
    Jetta:- 0.029/0.029
    Malibu: 0.036/0.036
    Avenger:0.044/0.006

    Rob