1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Tank MPG

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Fuel Economy' started by Indyking, Sep 10, 2009.

  1. a priori

    a priori Canonus Curiosus

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    3,083
    407
    23
    Location:
    Chicagoland (West)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Careful, Indy!!

    I'm not certain where you get the argument that you are "doing better." Sure, you have a higher average speed, but Wayne's FE is still considerably better. Ask him about his commute -- miles, stop lights/signs, traffic -- and then see if you could find a way to better it!

    We all yearn for a bit better. I've said more than once: Oh! What I'd Do to get a Longer Daily Commute!
     
  2. a64pilot

    a64pilot Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    771
    62
    0
    Location:
    Albany Ga.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    700 div by 60 = 11.6 700 tank is easy. 800 is beyond my reach, I'm sure.
     
  3. Indyking

    Indyking Happy Hyundai owner...

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    1,280
    90
    0
    Location:
    I don't know... Indy, Chicago, Madison (WI)... it
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    It depends. Yes, you are partially right about the average MPH, but if someone averages say around 30-35 in a full tank, we both know that it likely represents real-life commuting with mixed city and hwy driving with some stop lights and stop signs. Who in the world will drive 40 MPH on cruise control for a full thank just to get a record MPG? In theory your point is well taken, but let's think about what really happens out there in the real world. The report of 70+ MPG from Wayne, for instance, is not surprised because he was commuting at 20 MPH on average, so he was using the ICE a lot less, or do you think he actually set the cruise at 20 MPH and drove a full tank on that speed? I don't think so...
     
  4. a64pilot

    a64pilot Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    771
    62
    0
    Location:
    Albany Ga.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    That's why I made this statement. Lower speed is a BIG factor in high mileage in my opinion, maybe the biggest.
     
  5. Indyking

    Indyking Happy Hyundai owner...

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    1,280
    90
    0
    Location:
    I don't know... Indy, Chicago, Madison (WI)... it
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I can guarantee if I drive my same commute right now at lower speeds, (20 MPH like Wayne) I would get 70+ or maybe 80+ of tank MPG easily. The problem is: I don't want get late to work and I go home at lunch time in a very thigh schedule... so, not happening.

    There is no question that MPG numbers at 20 MPH is somewhat useless...
     
  6. Indyking

    Indyking Happy Hyundai owner...

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    1,280
    90
    0
    Location:
    I don't know... Indy, Chicago, Madison (WI)... it
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Exactly... Ask wayne about it... :cool:
     
  7. a priori

    a priori Canonus Curiosus

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    3,083
    407
    23
    Location:
    Chicagoland (West)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Unless, of course, that is the kind of commute someone drives.:D
     
  8. Indyking

    Indyking Happy Hyundai owner...

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    1,280
    90
    0
    Location:
    I don't know... Indy, Chicago, Madison (WI)... it
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Just as a important note:

    I'm not trying to compete with anyone here regarding MPG readings, although being able to hypermiling and see good results is rather satisfying. We are all WINNERS just by being Prius owners.

    My point is: people recording MPG data should take into consideration other factors like: tank vs. short trip mileage, MPH, weather conditions, cargo load, etc.

    We have to do our best to avoid false impressions of outstanding MPG readings, so newbies or those still learning hypermiling don't get frustrated with our numbers. That's all I care.
     
  9. Indyking

    Indyking Happy Hyundai owner...

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    1,280
    90
    0
    Location:
    I don't know... Indy, Chicago, Madison (WI)... it
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Very true...
     
  10. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,363
    15,508
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    In engineering we call it 'managing user expectations' and that is why I've tried to focused on the baseline vehicle performance.

    Bob Wilson
     
  11. TheDJ

    TheDJ New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    3
    0
    0
    Location:
    FdLWis
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I've been lurking here for several months and have found it to be interesting. I picked up my Gen III July 2nd and have rolled up 4500 miles so far. I just filled up this afternoon with 589 miles using 9 gallons. The display reads 69.2mpg's and I calculate at 65.4. I've seen a 5.5% gap on each fill. But who's complaining.

    This is a mix of all kinds of driving where I take it easy and some times not so easy. I love to hear the squeal of the tires now and then. I've never got below 58mpg's.
     
  12. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    That's interesting. Most people see the 5% the other way around.

    Tom
     
  13. angelrob

    angelrob New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    94
    12
    0
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait just a minute here..:confused:..I've been assuming that because I've only been able to put 9.5 gallons in, that the "empty" indicator was firing early and that I still had ~2 gallons in the tank.

    You're telling me that it's the TOP of the tank that is empty when I "fill" it to the first click off, even when going at a low flow rate??? :shocked:Why does the gauge read full then? (as a practical matter, if I were designing it, I'd want it to err on the side of the user having MORE fuel than they think they have...but that's just me :)

    Ms. Glass Half-Full :tea:
     
  14. Celtic Blue

    Celtic Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    2,224
    139
    0
    Location:
    Midwest
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    What's the point of posting photos of the MFD display? The G3 MFD is so far off that what they should really be taking pictures of is their manual mpg calculations.
     
  15. jburns

    jburns Senior Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    829
    111
    0
    Location:
    Archdale, NC
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    I wonder how much the extended warranty would be.
     
  16. Econ

    Econ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    329
    26
    14
    Location:
    East of the Berkshires - MA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    you remember how to do this ... RIGHT?

    top off you gas tank.... to the rim or until you can't get another drop in the tank. Don't spill a drop

    Take the mileage down or write the mileage on the ODO.
    Do your thing.. drive drive and drive til the refuel light comes on.
    Top off you gas tank to the rim or to the point you can't get another drop in the tank

    How many gallons did you take to fill the tank?

    Then do the math. miles traveled divided by the gallons used. Well ah.... MPG

    PS:
    this first click or shut off is not the true top off. I can get a gallon and a half more in the tank after the first click off. You need two absolute top offs to get the real MPG. On my CR-V the first click off is very close to the absolute top off.
     
  17. Econ

    Econ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    329
    26
    14
    Location:
    East of the Berkshires - MA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    fireing early is good. Gives you 100 mile to get fuel
     
  18. a64pilot

    a64pilot Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    771
    62
    0
    Location:
    Albany Ga.
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    I believe I have put at least two gallons more than the first click, Do so at your own peril of course. My personal observation of other cars that I have removed the tanks from is that there is a bump on top of the tank where the vent is connected, and your not filling fuel up in that bump, the shape of the tank prevents that. I would assume the Prius is the same way. But I do believe it's possible to damage the system by filling the tank completely full of cool fuel and allowing it to sit in the sun and expand. I see aircraft venting fuel on the ground all of the time from this.
    I have seen documentation that GM intentionally has their fuel indicating systems calibrated so that by the time the gage is indicating 1/2 much more than 1/2 of the fuel has been used. They do this because most people refuel with a lot of indicated fuel remaining and therefore they are not getting as much use of the tank as they could. I assume this may be an industry standard? All vehicles that I have exhibit this.
    I know a person that is convinced that her Tahoe gets worse mileage in the last half of the tank, so in order to get better mileage she refuels before the gage indicates 1/2. :rolleyes: You can't make that up, it's too stupid, but she is convinced.
     
  19. TheDJ

    TheDJ New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    3
    0
    0
    Location:
    FdLWis
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    The air gap in the top of the tank is called ullage. It's designed into the tank to allow for thermal expansion.
     
  20. a priori

    a priori Canonus Curiosus

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    3,083
    407
    23
    Location:
    Chicagoland (West)
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    ? I think most of us have the similar situation where the MID numbers are about 5% or so higher than the calculated mileage. Right?