1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

2005 Prius after 100,000 Miles

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Main Forum' started by a_gray_prius, Sep 27, 2009.

  1. a_gray_prius

    a_gray_prius Rare Non-Old-Blowhard Priuschat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    2,927
    782
    0
    Location:
    IL
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    [​IMG]Someone did a cost analysis of their 2005 Prius after 100,000 miles. It was posted on Flickr at [flickr link doesn't want to post correctly].

    "http://www.flickr.com/photos/prescott_small/3948540932/"

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Sandy

    Sandy Hippi Chick

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    860
    53
    0
    Location:
    Ocala,Fl
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Not readable
     
  3. uart

    uart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    4,215
    1,201
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    +1 (Agreed )
     
  4. jdenenberg

    jdenenberg EE Professor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    3,868
    1,866
    1
    Location:
    Trumbull, CT
    Vehicle:
    2020 Prius
    Model:
    LE AWD-e
    Firefox with the ImageZoom plugin allows you to read the graphic. The OP's inplied negative is off base. The grapic indicates that the owner had saved $5500 in gas (compared to a reasonable car - 23MPG) and had low maintenance cost ($350 for leaking strut, plus oil changes).

    I have driven my 2004 158,000 miles and saved almost $9000 in gas. My maintenance costs were a little higher as I take good car of my Prius (ATF changes every 60k, Coolant at 100k, coolant and pumps at 150k) but this is still lower than my previous cars.

    JeffD
     
  5. a_gray_prius

    a_gray_prius Rare Non-Old-Blowhard Priuschat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    2,927
    782
    0
    Location:
    IL
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    1. The flickr guy doesn't have a bigger version (e.g. I have no choise but to post this size)
    2. The implied negative was a byproduct of me not having javascript on (I didn't explicitly pick the thumbs down and now I can't change it). This was meant to be an FYI thread.