1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Bird deaths by human agency

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by tochatihu, Apr 28, 2019.

  1. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Large risks to birds are sometimes attributed to wind turbines, so I bring together some annual estimates, specific to US. It there is interest these could be shored up with actual research citations.

    Total number US birds: 10 to 20 billion (that’s a lot of tweets).

    Free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3 to 4.0 billion birds per year

    Building crashes kill as many as 970 million birds annually (windows should be decorated!).

    175 million birds die by flying into power lines or at those towers.

    Legal hunting exceeds 100 million.

    72 million are poisoned by misapplied pesticides.

    Vehicle collisions: 50 to 100 million.

    Communication towers bird deaths: 4 to 10 million

    Oil and gas industry fluid waste pits: as many as 1 million birds

    Hay cutting 1 million (listen better, little birdies).

    Land-based wind turbines killed as many as 573,000 birds in 2012. Furthermore, by 2030 or before, a 10-fold increase in turbines is expected to boost annual bird mortality to 1.4 to 2 million.


    ==

    Those wind-turbine fatalities include estimated 83,000 raptor (large predatory bird) fatalities, which are often emphasized. I cannot find source for this estimate. Other sources indicate raptors are from 3 to 15% of wind-turbine bird kills, which would extrapolate to 19,000 to 86,000. Raptors (including owls) were 59% of bird fatalities at California’s famous Altamont Pass, but wind turbines are not being built like that anymore. Another way to approach this would be with estimated 0.033 raptors killed per turbine per year, multiplied by number of turbines. Turbine fleet of 60,000 works out to 2000 raptors.

    Before continuing, need to take a shot at estimating raptor populations. Very difficult (especially as Wikipedia has disappeared here). I’ll say 4 million in total, dominated by hawks, vultures and owls. Perhaps 50,000 eagles (golden and bald). Kinda fluffing on eagle populations in Alaska, but they are not at risk for causes mentioned below (except perhaps poisoning).

    Power lines and towers 1 kill million raptors per year??? This is a very uncertain estimate based on extrapolation from small-scale studies. There have been strong efforts to design equipment to minimize risks to large birds, and it is thought to have lowered fatality rates. If total raptor population is about 4 million, this 1 million estimate seems very unlikely. Big birds do not reproduce rapidly enough to keep up with that.

    Except for burrowing owls, one would suppose feral cats eat few raptors (more likely the converse!). Perhaps some chicks fall and end that way, but they’d probably be doomed even in a cat-free world.

    There is little legal hunting of raptors in US (you can get a vulture permit).

    Raptors apparently are only a small fraction of building crashes.

    Raptor fraction in vehicle-collision studies range from “none” to “most”.

    Indirect poisoning from rat poison or lead shot is a risk unique to raptors (including carrion feeders). I find no mortality estimates here either, but high (>50%) proportions of sick raptors taken to ‘sick-bird places’ have dangerous blood levels of rodenticides or lead.

    ==
    Summary.

    For birds in general, wind turbines are far down the list of killers.

    For raptors it is very difficult to know, because no cause of death is adequately measured. If this is something people want to know, studies could be supported. In absence of defensible all-cause estimates, it makes no sense to claim wind turbines are the largest.

    Any guessing that I'd be in favor of studies to place raptor/turbine deaths into a quantitative framework would be correct.
     
    bisco likes this.
  2. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,713
    49,401
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    which human agency is killing them, is it a new one formed by trump?:mad:
     
    #2 bisco, Apr 28, 2019
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2019
  3. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,323
    3,591
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    What's your source on oil waste pit bird kill? Never heard that one. Sounds like someone is making up all this data to say wind turbines are not so bad.
     
  4. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,317
    10,166
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I believe our very own JimboPalmer has some direct experience with this, or something very very similar.
     
  5. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
  6. iplug

    iplug Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    2,455
    1,703
    0
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    Vehicle:
    Other Electric Vehicle
    Model:
    ----USA----
    You beat me to the Australia news posting. U.S. needs to follow on this, unfortunately will not happen. Emotion >> Logic.:(
     
  7. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    There are feral-cat control programs elsewhere that could be mentioned. Actually a global examination of this could have much merit. More than birds are on the menu...

    ==
    I will give sources for oil-pond numbers. Please allow some time for me to find the best work. I suppose such ponds are all subject to direct observation, and that bird mishaps do not quickly disappear. For those reason, observational data is probably more accurate there than at cell towers, power lines, or wind turbines.

    External to US focus, Alberta oil sand activities seem to 'collect' a lot of birds. But making this a global discussion would take a lot of effort.

    ==
    Have suggested before that stilling wind turbines as bird migrations pass through could avoid some Cuisinart (TM) action. I know that happens in Israel but ??? anywhere else.
     
  8. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    22,052
    11,517
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Not a big hurdle, but any cat kill programs in the US would need address the safety to bobcat and lynx populations. This gets more difficult in other parts of the world were the local, endangered wild cats can easily be mistaken for a house cat. Australia doesn't have such an issue.

    Large scale TNR won't help out birds immediately, but will over time.

    Really, people just need to keep their cats indoors. The bird killers aren't all ferals.
     
  9. iplug

    iplug Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    2,455
    1,703
    0
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    Vehicle:
    Other Electric Vehicle
    Model:
    ----USA----
    Agree, feral cats would require more nuanced eradication techniques in the U.S..

    TNR is a bit better than our current U.S. ~nothing plan, but trap and euthanize would be substantially more effective. TNR is still a danger to birds when released as the cats go on killing. TNR assumes an outdoor cat life is more important than a native bird. Would hope to change opinion on that.

    Agree, domestic cats (Felis catus) as outdoor pets are killers beyond the feral ones and outdoor cats feed into the feral cycle. Requiring mandatory registration and tagging, trapping outdoor cats, notifying registered owner and posting captured cats to a database, and levying fines to the owners who come to claim them would go a long way to fixing this problem.
     
    Trollbait likes this.
  10. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,317
    10,166
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    According to local wildlife agencies, euthanization is not effective for certain other (wild-ish) species in the suburban area, such as coyotes. Killing some of them, particularly the local alpha breeders, sets off a reproductive race among the betas, often causing a population boomlet and increasing their predations. If the habitat is there, some animals will fill it.

    Doesn't some of this apply to feral cats too? Killing the older dominate animals and emptying the habit boosts the reproductive rate of the younger un-captured non-neutered animals.
     
  11. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Strong dominance of cats as de-birding agents suggests that even incomplete efforts at cat population control could have substantial leverage.

    ==
    Mostly separate from topic here, cats in the bird food chain can move bird diseases around. All cat predators can do that, but only indoor/outdoor cats vector the goodies back to you.

    Completely separate from topic here, cats taking rabid bats are serious things.
     
  12. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,713
    49,401
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    we need more cats around airports
     
  13. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Unleash the betas@10. I know of no information on that subject. My eco-sense is that it should matter more for species with hierarchical clan structure. Coyotes and kitties being polar opposites in that regard.

    Genetic sequencing from hair and feces is getting very inexpensive. Should be feasible to sample an area (where cats are important predators) and find out who's boinking whom. Then trap out a selection of cats and see how population responds.
     
  14. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Airport cats@12. If it's effective and if bird-control companies are not doing it. That would be strange.

    A new career for bisco...
     
  15. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,713
    49,401
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i'm retired, and like birds more than airplanes
     
    Zythryn likes this.
  16. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,713
    49,401
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i wouldn't mind a windmill though
     
  17. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,317
    10,166
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Cats tend to go mostly for little songbirds, not the big geese and ducks that are most risky to commercial aircraft.
     
  18. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,713
    49,401
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    need bigger cats?
     
  19. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,317
    10,166
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    What size cat is big enough for Canada geese, but too small to take human children?
     
  20. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,046
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    I like birds also. They have an array of 'natural' predators and it's difficult to gripe about that. But human population increase has altered the landscape. Both in literal and metaphorical senses. That's just the way things are eh?

    But in many areas of human agency, effects on bird populations can be dialed down without sacrificing civilization's goodies. This is why we talk about cat population control, decorating big glass windows, increasing spacing between power line 'phases', controlling release of rat poison and lead pellets to the environment. And even painting wind-turbine blades funny colors so those birdbrains notice.

    ==
    I omitted an 'elephant' from this room initially. It is habitat modification, and birds including migratory ones notice :eek:

    That situation will not be undone, but bird boxes and other bandaids can help a little. Bird feeders are a perplexing subject though. Unusually high bird and poop density seems to promote disease transmission at least in some cases.
     
    #20 tochatihu, Apr 29, 2019
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2019
    iplug likes this.