1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Chrysler refuses to payback $3.7bln in TARP funds

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by efusco, Dec 22, 2009.

  1. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,191
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Chrysler Says It Won't Pay U.S. (Us) Back

    If you're keeping a list of who's been naughty or nice, you might want to sharpen your pencil for Chrysler and GM.

    In a special message of holiday cheer, Chrysler announced through filings last week that its pre-bankruptcy self doesn't appear to want to make good on its $3.7 billion loan from U.S. taxpayers. The money went to the old Chrysler (now called, officially, the "OldCar Co") through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in April of 2009 when the company announced its "fast track" Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

    Counter that against the letter then-CEO Bob Nardelli wrote to stakeholders before the money came through:

    "Our viability plan demonstrates that Chrysler will repay the U.S. government loans in full, with a premium beginning in 2012," Nardelli wrote. "As we have indicated all along, shared sacrifice is necessary for Chrysler's survival."

    Nardelli, long gone, doesn't have to answer why, but we hope he blushes when he looks at himself in the mirror in the morning. The announcement also appears to fly in the face of TARP's marching orders, which counted recoupment as a major factor in its passage through Congress. The thinking was that no TARP funds would ever add to the national debt. At least from what we've heard from Chrysler, that doesn't appear to be the case.
     
  2. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    464
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    surprise, surprise.
     
  3. risingsun

    risingsun seeker of the way

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    186
    30
    6
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Chrysler sux.
     
  4. Felt

    Felt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    1,624
    603
    0
    Location:
    Mountain West
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Maybe that is not all bad. Congress has diverted other loan repayments and squanders it on graft, corruption and political favors.
     
  5. dogfriend

    dogfriend Human - Animal Hybrid

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    7,512
    1,185
    0
    Location:
    Carmichael, CA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Don't worry. Karma will catch up with Chrysler. Its just a matter of time now. If the gas prices spike like they did in 2008, Chrysler will be history. I don't think Fiat designed products are going to be popular with North American customers; they weren't 30 years ago.
     
  6. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Obama did it apparently!
     
  7. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    320
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Unless TARP is a special case, when a person or company files for bankruptcy, GOVERNMENT debts are not erased. If you owe huge sums of money to private entities and you owe back taxes and government loans, and you file for bankruptcy, everything is erased BUT NOT government back taxes and loans.

    Is the TARP program "special" or something ????
     
  8. GreenGuy33

    GreenGuy33 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    534
    29
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    I have always hated Chrysler products. This is just one more reason to hate Chrysler.
    From being the only car company without a 5-star safety vehicle to being gas guzzlers and poor quality vehicles, we car start digging their grave now.
    The previous poster was right about Karma.:rockon:
     
  9. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,068
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I'm pretty sure the "OldCar Co" is the Cerberus owned company. Personally, I think it would be a good thing to bring Cerberus 'back to the table.'

    As near as I can tell Cerberus is just another corporate dismantler that works on the principle of borrowing money to buy a company and then selling off the pieces ... often to other dismantlers. I suspect Cerberus got 'caught'. They are trying to evade responsibility and leave Chrysler with 'the bill.'

    As for whether or not Chyrsler should continue as a car manufacturer, I have no great love lost for them. They worked hard to get where they are today and still lack imagination beyond the PowerPoints they issued earlier this year and late last year.

    Bob Wilson
     
  10. dogfriend

    dogfriend Human - Animal Hybrid

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    7,512
    1,185
    0
    Location:
    Carmichael, CA
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Yes, back in the 80's, they were known as LBO (leveraged buyout) firms. Now they are known as Private Equity firms but they work the same way. I don't understand why Chrysler qualified for TARP funds when they were privately owned. I suppose they (the gov't) didn't want to lose the Chrysler jobs. They were just delaying the inevitable.

    If the gov't wants to stop the loss of jobs, they need to start regulating the Private Equity / Leveraged Buyouts to keep these greedy a-holes from destroying productive companies.

    Joshua Kosman, Predicting The Next Credit Crisis : NPR

    Cerberus Drags Private Equity Firms into Spotlight : NPR
     
  11. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    The simplest way to discorage this is the future is to not award Chrysler any government fleet sales until it is paid back.

    I am betting fleet sales is all that keeps them afloat, no individual would choose a Chrysler product if there were other alternatives.
     
  12. boppo

    boppo Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    799
    138
    0
    Location:
    Owego, NY
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I wouldn't buy any US car. The last time I had a US car was in 1976 and traded it for a honda. I hope everybody stops buying Chrylers until the pay us back.
     
  13. DaveFDEMS

    DaveFDEMS New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    97
    12
    0
    Location:
    WI
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A

    The figures may have changed over the last 2 years but prior to that chrysler had less than 5% of all fleet sales in the nation. Ford owns the fleet sale market in the US
     
  14. paprius4030

    paprius4030 My first Prius

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    2,077
    295
    0
    Location:
    Ormond Beach,Fl.
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    At least in Pa. if you see a new Dodge Avenger it has Pa. goverment plates and it seems all the Police Depts. are switching to dodge Charger's since Ford quit making the Crown Vic. Why did Ford quit making the Crown Vic. when they had the Taxi cab and Police market pretty much to themselves.
     
  15. cycledrum

    cycledrum PSOCSOASP

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    8,245
    1,202
    0
    Location:
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    I might consider a Ford *if* I needed and could easily afford a 2nd new car. I see Ford as the best of the three, but I had a strange encounter with a longtime Ford employee, a rep at an auto show who was a Ford engineer for years. He claimed a Ford Escort emits less pollution per mile than a Prius. And he also claimed that 4-door hatchbacks are inherently unsafe because they will crush if hit in the rear quarter panel, and that Ford does not like to build cars with that format. He claimed that sedans are the safer format for small-mid cars. O.K?
     
  16. Chuck.

    Chuck. Former Honda Enzyte Driver

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    2,766
    1,510
    0
    Location:
    Lewisville, TX (Dallas area)
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Many think Ford's increase in market share were former GM and Chrysler customers hissed they took TARP money....this bad PR might cost Chrysler more than it saves. ;)

    Pity - I wanted to see them crank out this...

    [​IMG]
     
  17. DaveFDEMS

    DaveFDEMS New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    97
    12
    0
    Location:
    WI
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Ford still makes the Crown Vic and police interceptor. The difference is they are available to the fleet sales market only since 08.

    The chargers are gaining popularity because you can fully outfit one for under 20k at the moment. However many departments in my area that have bought them Have a love hate relationship with them. They say they are great cars but as far as arrest transports they prefer the crown vic. Once you put the cage/divider in the charger there is zero room in the back seat
     
  18. Prianista

    Prianista Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    245
    13
    0
    Location:
    Seattle
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    That's why Ford has just announced that it will recall all Focus ZX5's and buy them back from their owners at the original purchase price. Yeah, right.
     
    1 person likes this.