1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Cost of electricity from "renewable sources"

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by felton, Mar 29, 2006.

  1. felton

    felton New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    72
    4
    0
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    During a lull the other day, it occured to me that perhaps the economics of electricity generation had shifted to the point that "green" power might favor wind or other "renewable" sourced electricity over the juice that is typically provided from the power companies. Here in Texas, we have "options" as to our electricity providers and a fairly easy to understand rate table is provided at http://www.powertochoose.org/. The current cost per kwh is hovering near $.15, give or take. From memory, that is approximately a 50% increase over the rate the last time I checked it.

    I do vaguely recall that, in the past, the cost per kwh of "renwable/wind" power was a bit more, but considerably less than the $.15 per kwh that the "standard" rate is today. In other words, renewable power seems to be offered at a constantly moving premium relative to the standard benchmark rate. I can understand the increase in electricity rates when the fossil fuels that generate it are rising, but why are renewable sourced electrical rates rising?

    Perhaps my thinking is mired in the days when rates were regulated based on costs, but either my memory is faulty or there is a problem with the pricing of wind and renewable electricity. The premium for wind power is not that great, but it seems that asking people to spend any more for anything based on the environmental impact is asking a lot, as we have all seen with the great "will a hybrid pay for itself" debate.
     
  2. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(felton @ Mar 29 2006, 11:22 AM) [snapback]231772[/snapback]</div>
    You nailed it here. For Joe Six-pack, if it doesn't save him money TODAY, then it isn't worth considering. There is no value in "doing the right thing" or protecting the environment. The only value worth considering is "what's in it for me?" At least that's how it looks from the top of MY ivory tower (just trying to head some comments off at the pass) :)
     
  3. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    My guess is that they lack the capacity and probably every kWh of wind energy produced in TX is bespoke already. You guys have just of 2 GW of capacity installed, I believe. That number is steadily increasing. TX is a hot bed for wind development. My guess is that the cost, in this case, is supply (or the lack thereof) driven. Here in CO there's a wait list for the windsource program. Xcel Energy is currently in the process of trippeling the wind capacity in the state to 775 MW. Even then I think there will be a waiting list. This year wind power has actually been cheaper than conventional power because of the shortages of NG. Wind is booming in this country. It's really great to see the industry come of age.

    Here's an interesting link:

    http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=44451
     
  4. tideland_raj

    tideland_raj New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    108
    0
    0
    Location:
    Sunnyvale, CA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ Mar 29 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]231869[/snapback]</div>
    Dude, tripp, you use that spelling all the time?
    watch out standing up too fast, your ego might knock someone over ... :D

    That said, I do think that even without the government subsidies that other power supplies have (like, nuclear, or gasoline), wind and solar power are becoming competetive. Once they become cheaper singificantly, the world is in for a big change... hopefully for the better.
     
  5. felton

    felton New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    72
    4
    0
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ Mar 29 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]231869[/snapback]</div>
    Thanks. That link was very informative. It reinforced my perception that the cost of wind generated power may already be less expensive than the fossil fuel generated electricity, although the demand and capacity issues are having an effect on the pricing. As renewable power costs continue to decline and fossil fuel costs continue to rise, we should start to see some real changes for the better.

    I remember driving through West Texas and seeing some of those wind farms for the first time and was really impressed and pleased with what I saw. Much of that land has very little value for any other use, but there is some serious wind in those parts :)
     
  6. micheal

    micheal I feel pretty, oh so pretty.

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    842
    2
    0
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    No kidding! As much wind as there is here, there is tons of electricity that could be made!

    About six months ago, Lubbock put a windmill in at the windmill museum. I haven't heard much about it since then, but it was supposed to provided enough energy to power the museum and any excess would be sold back to the electric company.
     
  7. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    initial costs for wind in some areas was estimated at between 21 to 45 cpkw. but that was over the first 10 years. after that, the cost drops to less than half of that and continues to drop over the LT of the generator as there is little maintenance costs involved.

    sure the initial investment is high, but the return can far outweigh the cost and easily overcome the initial investment. it only takes time and a bundle of cash at first. that is where low interest government loans should be
     
  8. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    The other important aspect of most renewables is that the price of energy is stable. That's why so many companies are buying into the wind programs and buying green tags and the like. It makes their cost forcasting a LOT easier.

    Raj, you're killing me. I knew I should have looked it up. I think if we can get the cost of solar under $1/Watt the world is in for a huge change. The way that everyone thinks about and uses energy will change radically, I think. The average Joe will have ownership of energy and that will change the way it's (energy) abused.

    Oh, the other really important thing about wind is that it uses VERY little water per kWh generated. Coal and nuclear both use large amounts of water. In fact, 48% of water usage in the US is for power generation. That includes agriculture!
     
  9. felton

    felton New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    72
    4
    0
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(micheal @ Mar 29 2006, 08:14 PM) [snapback]231945[/snapback]</div>

    Having gone to school in Lubbock, I can easily believe that :) The Texas Panhandle was reputed to be the windiest area in the US. I can't attest to all other areas, but I do know that it took me a while to relearn to walk without leaning either forwards or backwards depending on the direction of the wind after I left :)
     
  10. clett

    clett New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    537
    19
    0
    Location:
    Scotland
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Over here in the UK, one of these costs about £1,000.

    [​IMG]

    http://www.renewabledevices.com/swift/images.htm

    Peak at 1.5kW, but typically give a third of rated power over a day on average (so 12 kWh per day).

    Over the 20 year lifetime of the device, that would work out to a cost of about 1.8 cents per kWh.

    The big 8 MW offshore turbines soon to come into service are set to be around that level too.
     
  11. hycamguy07

    hycamguy07 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    2,707
    3
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    The windmills are a cool concept, put one up at your hame and not have to rely on the power copmany.

    Below is a write up on the price increase here in fla.

    The Florida Public Service Commission, the regulatory authority that oversees costs customers pay for electricity, today approved Florida Power & Light Company’s request for a fuel cost adjustment on customer bills beginning in 2006.

    The adjustment reflects the extraordinary expenses for fuel used to generate electricity during a period of skyrocketing global energy costs compounded by the impact of major hurricanes this summer on natural gas and oil production and distribution in the Gulf of Mexico.

    The adjustment will result in an increase of $16.99 – or 19 percent – on a typical 1,000 kilowatt-hour monthly residential electric bill. That bill will increase from the current $91.62 to $108.61. Commercial and industrial customer bills will increase from 30 percent to 41 percent since fuel makes up a larger portion of their bills. The increase will be reflected in customer’s bills beginning Jan. 1, 2006.

    FPL’s total fuel costs to be recovered in 2006 will exceed $6.5 billion dollars. The total fuel adjustment is composed of the projection for fuel costs in 2006 and fuel costs for the first nine months of 2005 that were not collected through the 2005 adjustment.

    “Just as you go to a gas station to fill your vehicle, FPL buys fuel from fuel providers to power our power plants and just like you are paying higher prices, we are paying higher prices for the fuels we use to generate electricity on your behalf,†said Armando Olivera, FPL president. “We are committed to seeking ways to produce electricity at the lowest possible cost for our customers.â€

    FPL makes no profit on fuel used to generate electricity. FPL buys only the fuel required to serve customers and meet their electricity consumption needs -- a 30 percent increase in consumption per household since 1985. Because fuel prices are a direct pass through, FPL customers will never pay a penny over what the company pays to cover its fuel costs. And, if fuel prices should once again recede, the fuel price portion of the electric bill – which will be more than half of a customer’s bill in 2006 – would be reduced.

    FPL has taken a number of actions to mitigate the fuel price volatility on customer bills:

    While FPL cannot control factors driving world fuel prices, the company has taken a number of aggressive actions to mitigate the volatility of these extraordinary fuel costs and their impact on customers. Without these efforts, fuel prices would be even higher.

    FPL is a firm believer in the value of fuel diversity to help stabilize fuel costs as well as to maintain and improve overall system reliability. FPL’s generation mix includes nuclear (21 percent), coal (6 percent), purchased power (18 percent), oil (18 percent) and natural gas (37 percent).
    FPL makes maximum use of its nuclear generating units to provide as much low cost power from these non-oil and gas-fired units as possible.
    While coal prices have been increasing as well, coal prices are far less than oil and natural gas and subsequently FPL has been maximizing its use of the limited coal-fired generation that it owns and increasing coal-fired power purchases whenever possible.
    By taking advantage of the dual-fuel capabilities of a number of its generating units – that is, a number of plants can burn either oil or natural gas or a combination of both – FPL can take advantage of whichever of these fuel sources is least costly at any particular time.
    FPL also employs a strategy called fuel hedging -- supported by the PSC -- as a method of providing some level of protection against volatility in fuel prices. Through its hedging strategy started in 2002, FPL will have saved its customers more than a half billion dollars by end of 2005. The company expects that its hedging activities will provide significantly greater savings to customers in 2006.
    FPL’s non-nuclear power plant fleet is 12 percent more efficient than just five years ago because FPL has spent more than $2.3 billion to re-power older, less efficient generating units and build new, state-of-the-art natural gas-fired units in order to improve fuel efficiency – they now take less fuel to produce the same amount of electricity.
    Since 1999, FPL has been able to reduce base rates by 15 percent or approximately $4 billion. With the company’s latest rate agreement announced in August, the benefits of those earlier rate reduction agreements have been extended through 2009. These agreements and the savings and refunds they provide have helped to offset somewhat the impact of the rising fuel costs on customers during this period of skyrocketing fuel price increases.

    Wise use of energy encouraged

    The wise use of energy – and the benefits it can have on helping hold down monthly electricity bills – is more important than ever. FPL provides a number of services to help customers manage energy use. Key among them are on-line home energy surveys to identify appliance inefficiencies, rebates for energy efficiency upgrades and tips for low cost and no-cost ways to reduce the amount of electricity used at home and at work.

    Because air conditioning alone can amount to more than half of our total energy consumption in the summer months, FPL offers customers an incentive to install high-efficiency heating and cooling systems for homes, and incentives also are offered for homes to increase home ceiling insulation.

    The company offers a monthly incentive for those customers who voluntarily choose to participate in a program that allows FPL to periodically cycle-off appliances such as pool pumps and water heaters for short periods during times of system-wide peak energy use. The program is called On Call®. Additionally, to prevent major fluctuations in the electric bill, the FPL Budget Billing ® program evens out energy costs so customers pay about the same each month.

    Florida Power & Light Company is the principal subsidiary of FPL Group, Inc. (NYSE: FPL), nationally known as a high quality, efficient and customer -driven organization focused on energy-related products and services. With annual revenues of more than $10 billion and a growing presence in 26 states, FPL Group is widely recognized as one of the country’s premier power companies. Florida Power & Light Company serves 4.3 million customer accounts in Florida . FPL Energy, LLC, FPL Group’s wholesale electricity generating subsidiary, is a leader in producing electricity from clean and renewable fuels. Additional information is available on the Internet at www.FPL.com, www.FPLGroup.com and www.FPLEnergy.com.
     
  12. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ Mar 29 2006, 05:18 PM) [snapback]231869[/snapback]</div>
    "As far as the bats are concerned, I might speculate that the demise of bats that can't evade a 16rpm turbine may only improve the gene pool?"

    I love that comment from one of the readers.

    Is wind going to kill solar?
     
  13. micheal

    micheal I feel pretty, oh so pretty.

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    842
    2
    0
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(felton @ Mar 30 2006, 10:50 AM) [snapback]232308[/snapback]</div>
    No doubt! Not to mention walking with you eyes squinted as much as possible and your mouth clamped shut to avoid as much of the blowing dust as possible. :blink:
     
  14. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(burritos @ Mar 30 2006, 08:00 PM) [snapback]232705[/snapback]</div>
    Definitely not. They're actually remarkably complementary. We just need to get the cost of solar down. I think that we're about a decade away from really cheap solar. That's going to revolutionize the way that people think about energy and the way that we produce it.