1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

CR report on least, and most expensive brands to maintain.

Discussion in 'Tesla' started by Zythryn, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:02 AM.

  1. Zythryn

    Zythryn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    6,282
    4,281
    1
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    Other Electric Vehicle
    Model:
    N/A
    I thought this was interesting.
    According to their methodology, (which I have yet to dig into), Tesla is one of the cheapest brands to maintain.
    It actually isn’t even close.

    Four of Five Least-Expensive Brands to Maintain Are American - Consumer Reports

    Buick tied with Toyota at 2nd. I wonder if the lack of trucks helped Buick out.

    Land Rover was eye popping! They came in last.
     
    #1 Zythryn, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:02 AM
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2024 at 11:08 AM
    3PriusMike and bwilson4web like this.
  2. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,938
    8,233
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2018 Chevy Volt
    Model:
    Premium
    Yeah it's been one of their dirty little secrets for quite some time. 2 decades ago when the dollar still had value, we fortunately had to have our Range Rover's transfer case replace just a few days before the warranty ended. $6,000 just for the part.
    .
     
  3. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    109,128
    49,606
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Land Rover has had a bad reputation for a long time, like most British vehicles, but Buick is an odd one.
    I’d have to see the criteria, I don’t trust cr and would never use their recommendations
     
  4. Zythryn

    Zythryn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    6,282
    4,281
    1
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    Other Electric Vehicle
    Model:
    N/A
    The criteria appears pretty straight forward:
    They measure years 1-5 and then 6-10.

    They do not try to correct for companies that offer x years of free maintenance. Concluding maintenance during the first 1-3 years tends to be the lowest cost.
    As they are literally measuring cost, and not reliability, it seems pretty straightforward.

    The Buick placement does have me curious as well. All in all, an interesting read.