1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Dumb Dad Question: physics homework

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by SageBrush, Oct 20, 2008.

  1. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    I asked my son to figure out power consumption of a car travelling on a horizontal at constant acceleration without friction. We know the correct answer is Force * average_velocity, but would like help understanding why the following gives the wrong answer:

    initial velocity and position are zero --
    P - power
    W - work
    F - force
    d - distance
    a - acceleration
    t- time
    v- velocity

    P = W/t = F*d/t = F * a * t^2/2t = F*v/2

    ---
    All we did is subsitute distance as at^2/2, and v/t for 'a' ...
     
  2. Rokeby

    Rokeby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    3,033
    708
    75
    Location:
    Ballamer, Merlin
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    It's a trick question: if there's no friction between the wheel and the road,
    there can be no acceleration. :eek:

    The car did, does, and will forever have the constant velocity of zero. :D

    Newton's First Law, IIRC
     
  3. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,232
    1,563
    0
    Location:
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Unless it's a rocket car. :)
     
  4. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Not meant to be a trick question, believe me.
     
  5. brick

    brick Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    1,083
    78
    0
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    F=m*a . It fixes almost everything.

    **EDIT**

    I think you need to back up to the beginning. What is given in the problem statement?
     
  6. kevinwhite

    kevinwhite Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    331
    199
    0
    Location:
    Los Gatos Ca
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Why do you say it is the wrong answer?

    v/2 is the average velocity so the result is Force times the average velocity as you originally stated.

    kevin

    PS I assume that your term "without friction" means without losses caused by air resistance, rolling resistance etc, not that there is no friction between the tire and the road.
     
  7. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Hi Kevin,

    I cannot convince myself that v/2 is average velocity. Seems like it should be v(final)/t ? Help please
     
  8. donee

    donee New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    2,956
    197
    0
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Hi Sage,

    I think your problem is that a is Delta-v/Delta-t, not v/t. You are confusing the two. So, the equivalence you use is only valid if v0 is (starting velocity) zero, and startint time t0, is zero. In which case v/2 is the average velocity, if accelleration is constant, and v is the final velocity (speed actually, since velocity is a vector quantity).

    In otherwords your final equation should be:

    P = F*(v1-v0)/2 , assuming t0 is zero.

    since a = (v1-v0)/(t1-t0)
     
  9. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,531
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    Thanks everybody, I finally get it.

    v/2 is the average speed, not v/t. I think it was solving SAT questions ad nauseum with my kids that turned me into a block of cheese. You know -- average is Sum of values/number of elements. It can still be calculated this way, but the numerator is vt/2 and the denominator is t.