1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Energy unit costs

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by etyler88, Feb 13, 2007.

  1. etyler88

    etyler88 etyler88

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    450
    2
    0
    Location:
    Dover, DE
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I am tired of teasing myself each time I hear about an alternative energy source. The energy that the masses use is the one that is cheapest. So to keep track of what is close to reality I am hoping the greater community will track and update energy unit costs of various energy sources. Please fill in if you have good information. Feel free to modify or make suggestions.

    Energy source Unit cost per Megawatt (gigawatt or other) Notes Comment/other

    Coal
    Oil
    Natural gas
    Wind
    Solar
    Geothermal
    Solar tower
    Biofuel
    Nuclear
    Ocean tides
    Other
     
    #1 etyler88, Feb 13, 2007
  2. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    It depends on many of these. For example, Wyoming coal is cheaper there than in the places that import the coal which, of course, changes the cost.
     
    #2 tripp, Feb 13, 2007
  3. TimBikes

    TimBikes New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    2,492
    245
    0
    Location:
    WA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    You forgot conservation; i.e. cost per unit of energy saved.
     
    #3 TimBikes, Feb 14, 2007
  4. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TimBikes @ Feb 14 2007, 12:19 AM) [snapback]390066[/snapback]</div>
    and efficiency too! ;)
     
    #4 tripp, Feb 14, 2007
  5. skruse

    skruse Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    1,454
    97
    0
    Location:
    Coloma CA - Sierra Nevada
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
    I'd like to reinforce conservation and negawatts and negaLiters. Energy retained and not used is always cheaper. Efficiency tops the cost-effective list, no matter what the energy source. Thinking long-term, renewables will increasingly be "cheaper" and more cost effective.

    As Rocky Mountain Institute (http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid408.php) reminds us, sustainable least cost transportation requires focusing on people and communities, not individual cars.
     
    #5 skruse, Feb 14, 2007
  6. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    According to the Geothermal Energy Assc. the cost for geothermal is 5.5 to 7.5 cents per kilowatt hour.

    Here's the reference
     
    #6 tripp, Feb 14, 2007
  7. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ Feb 14 2007, 11:50 AM) [snapback]390202[/snapback]</div>
    Well then fossil fuels ultimately are the least efficient. After all, you are merely tapping solar energy in the most circuitous manner possible.

    This leads me to a question. Where does wind energy ultimately come from? I'm assuming that's also solar 2nd to the heating of bodies of water and land with subsequent movement of air from the pressure differentials created by the temperature differentials. Anyone have a better explanation?
     
    #7 burritos, Feb 14, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)