1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

I'm Prius-damaged

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Main Forum' started by chogan, Oct 29, 2006.

  1. chogan

    chogan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    590
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    My car died last week -- Ford, not Prius. I've been looking pretty seriously for a new car, and I can't find another one I'd care to buy. And I blame the Prius. Because compared to my Prius, no other new car option looks very good.

    My wife's term is Prius-damaged (like Prius + smoke-damaged). She says I'm now a Prius-damaged car buyer. Loosely speaking, it means I don't just balk at gas guzzlers and cars that are style victims. I'm not satisfied with any car promising less than 50 MPG. Which means, practically speaking, right now, the only car I think worth buying is Prius. But I already have one of those, and don't particularly want another one.

    The car that died provides some perspective on where the auto industry went after the 1970s oil shocks. It was a '93 Ford Escort "Fuel Saver" model. The EPA rated it 31/39 mpg city/hwy, though it did a bit better than that for me with low-rolling-resistance tires. I got it because it was the highest MPG domestic I could fit into at the time, and as the car aged, I swore I wasn't going to buy another one until Ford offered a car that got better overall mileage than that. So here I am in the next century, the car finally died, and ... Ford still doesn't offer anything that gets as good overall gas mileage as my '93 Escort did. Ford made a cheap, reliable, efficient small car, then ... quit. I don't blame Ford. Gas got cheap,I guess they produced what people demanded. In so far as there is an enemy here, it is us. But I hope Ford gets the message -- if they'd have offered anything remotely like the Prius, I'd have bought that. Guess there aren't enough people like me to make that option worthwhile for them, or something.

    Maybe in a couple of years there'll be something out there to compete with the Prius. But right now, for the Prius-damaged car buyer, the options look like a Prius or nothing. For the time being, I'm choosing nothing. I don't need the car to commute. I've signed up for Flexcar here in Northern VA. I can always rent something if really need to drive somewhere. And I guess I could lease something for a few years. But at this point, I don't feel the need to buy another car until somebody offers something at least as efficient as a Prius.
     
  2. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,192
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    What's your resistance to a second Prius? Is it a functionality issue?
     
  3. Ari

    Ari New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    165
    0
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    I'd buy a Camry Hybrid in a heartbeat! I think the new styling is pretty good, inside and outside. They won't get Prius mileage, but I'll bet you can learn to drive them efficiently too. And even the Ford Escape Hybrid (gasp!) wouldn't be a bad choice. For a traditional ICE I'd probably go with a Honda Fit or Honda Civic, since Hondas seem to have better handling than other brands IMO. And of course there's nothing wrong with getting another Prius.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. VinceDee

    VinceDee Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    198
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ Oct 29 2006, 06:55 AM) [snapback]340242[/snapback]</div>
    I like your term, "Prius-damaged". What's particularly frustrating is that car manufacturers already offered high gas mileage cars 15-20 years ago, then stopped. The Honda CRX was rated in the 50mpg range for almost all of it's life; the 1986 Honda Civic Coupe HF was rated 52/57; 1989 Geo Metro rated at 53/58; The 1988 Chevy Sprint Metro was rated at an astounding 54/58! And these were all internal combustion engines. Imagine one of these with an installed hybrid system. It makes you wonder why the current crop of hybrids don't get much better mileage than they do.

    Unfortunately, the manufacturers discovered that they could make a huge profit margin with SUVs and pickup trucks, so they all but ignored high mpg cars in the '90s. I consider the Honda Insight and Toyota Prius to be just picking up where they left off, or even trying to make up some ground on those previous efforts. Doesn't it seem odd that Honda felt they had to take all these drastic measures making the Insight (aluminum body, aerodynamics, etc) to manufacture a car that only gets a tiny bit better mileage than a car they made 20 years ago?

    Vince
     
  5. TonyPSchaefer

    TonyPSchaefer Your Friendly Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    14,816
    2,498
    66
    Location:
    Far-North Chicagoland
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Advanced
    I'm not sure if you're bragging or complaining. :D

    All I can think to say is, "congratulations. Like most of the rest of us here, you see the truth."
     
  6. Tony_Min

    Tony_Min New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    36
    0
    0
    I am Prius Crazy.
     
  7. Beryl Octet

    Beryl Octet New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    1,293
    0
    0
    Location:
    Abingdon VA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ Oct 29 2006, 09:55 AM) [snapback]340242[/snapback]</div>
    It does change the way you think about cars. Sitting at a traffic light on a cold morning and noticing the fumes come out of all the other cars. Not sure it's something I would have thought about before.
     
  8. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    If you don't want to buy another Prius (though I don't understand why) I'd suggest you stick with Toyota or Honda. That means a Civic or Corolla if you want an economy car, or an Accord or Camry if you want a bigger car. The Camry hybrid would be a good choice if you need a bigger car than a Corolla. But, again, I'd say you already have the answer in your heart: you need another Prius.
     
  9. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    >> Can't find another car I want to buy

    Well, that's because there are no EVs on the market, of course. In your spare time, head on down to your local auto row and let 'em know you've got some cash just sitting around waiting for that time when they offer something you'd like to buy.
     
  10. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    18
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(darelldd @ Oct 29 2006, 08:14 AM) [snapback]340282[/snapback]</div>
    go to the dealer and say you have cash waiting for a EV! ha if it ain't on their lot they really don't care about you and probably never will. Sad fact of life. The hybrid market is just a dot on the overall picture and the EV is just an infitesimal spot on that dot. Like the fuel cell market in NA it just isn't going to happen. In a small country without any oil production it might be possible but in NA just a darelldd dream.
     
  11. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(VinceDee @ Oct 29 2006, 10:45 AM) [snapback]340250[/snapback]</div>
    I drove a Honda CRX for years. It was a great little car; peppy, quick, and great fuel mileage, but little is the key word. It was a toy compared to the Prius. I suspect that is the main reason the current crop of hybrids don't get better mileage. Can you imagine a CRX with the Prius HSD! With the Honda handling and the increased power and torque, wow! I want one.

    Tom
     
  12. chimohio

    chimohio New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    460
    0
    0
    If you absolutely don't want another Prius - go with the Camry hybrid. Same great design you know and love.
     
  13. chogan

    chogan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    590
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 29 2006, 09:11 AM) [snapback]340244[/snapback]</div>
    Yes, that's pretty much it. Putting aside my desire to buy a domestic-badged car, it boils down to owning something a little bigger than a Prius but not paying a huge efficiency penalty for it. Just for those times when the Prius is a bit of a squeeze. Room for one more adult if necessary (e.g., Grandma), room to toss in couple of bikes, room to take a week's vacation luggage for two adults and two kids, without close-packing the trunk.

    If it were just a question of getting something fuel-efficient to run about in, then I'd probably just get another Prius. Well, actually, as it is the most efficient car available, there's no probably to it: I'd get that. It's more that, having owned a Prius for a year and a half, there are maybe a dozen instances a year when I find that I wouldn't mind having something a little bigger. I can (and do) work around all of these, but ... a little bigger would be nicer. That's the essence of it.

    The Camry doesn't do it for me. It's too close to the size of the Prius. Darelldd's RAV4 EV is just about exactly what I'd like to own, though not at $55K. (I can buy a lot of carbon credits for that price, and used cars are used cars even if they are EVs.) The Ford Escape Hybrid seems about right, but what a step backward in fuel economy for day-to-day use, particularly at highway speeds. An Escape hybrid with a PHEV 30 battery pack would be just about exactly right -- a bit bigger than a RAV4, works like an EV in town, and overall about as efficient as a current Prius. But no such beast is commercially available, yet.

    If someone held a gun to my head and said I had to buy right now, I'd get an Escape hybrid. But for the time being, I'm getting comfortable with not having a second car, and just sharing the Prius intensively with my wife. (Or, more correctly, she is gracefully putting up with my sharing her Prius.) I realize that this solves none of the occasional problems I have with the size of the Prius. But I think there's going to a broader array of choices in a couple of years, and I think I'm reconciled to being a little less car-dependent for a while and seeing what Detroit cares to offer me in a couple of years.
     
  14. chogan

    chogan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    590
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(VinceDee @ Oct 29 2006, 09:45 AM) [snapback]340250[/snapback]</div>
    Well, I'll be darned. This is why I like Priuschat.

    I never knew there were once-upon-a-time cars offered with milages like this. But sure enough, a ping of the EPA website verifies your numbers in so far as I can find them on the EPA search page.

    I'm guessing these were mostly smaller than I would have cared to drive (I recall the Geo Metro being that sort of car), but ... so's the Insight, when you get right down to it.

    Yet, that kicks the heck out of my smug factor, to realize there were small, straight-gas cars two decades ago that offered better MPG than a Prius. Or at least nearly the MPG of a Prius. I'm looking at EPA 54 MPG overall for the 1986 2-seater Honda Civic Coupe HF. Looks like the car weighed in at about 1800 lbs. So that puts some needed perspective around pushing a 3,000 lb car like the Prius at 50 MPG or so, roughly 2 decades later. That's an improvement in terms of ton-miles per gallon of gas, for sure, but maybe yes/maybe no in terms of average passenger miles per gallon.

    Whether or not you'd use the term "toy" to refer to light cars like this, that's still an interesting perspective. Seven years after the second oil shock ( 1977 or so) you had your choice of (small) cars getting 50+ MPG. Three decades later, 50 mpg means Prius, that's it.
     
  15. daniel

    daniel Cat Lovers Against the Bomb

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    14,487
    1,518
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ Oct 29 2006, 05:29 PM) [snapback]340441[/snapback]</div>
    Here's the vehicle you want. True, it's $68K, but it's got cargo space and economy:
    http://www.acpropulsion.com/ebox/pricing.htm

    For $55 they take your Toyota Scion and turn it into a full EV.
     
  16. darelldd

    darelldd Prius is our Gas Guzzler

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    6,057
    389
    0
    Location:
    Northern CA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ Oct 29 2006, 07:10 PM) [snapback]340457[/snapback]</div>
    Don't fool yourself with the similarity though. The Prius is FAR cleaner than any of these cars ever was, and the Prius is roomier and has far more power. Yes, I agree it is good to note what can be done with straight ICE. But make no mistake... you are justified in your Prius smugness still. :)

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Frank Hudon @ Oct 29 2006, 09:33 AM) [snapback]340291[/snapback]</div>
    It isn't like we have the option of continuing with gasoline ICE indefinitely. We WILL have EVs in some form or another. Yes, even here in NA. My "dream" is that we'll head down the EV path before our infatuation with the status quo becomes too expensive and painful.
     
  17. chogan

    chogan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    590
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(daniel @ Oct 29 2006, 09:10 PM) [snapback]340458[/snapback]</div>
    Daniel, yes, that's pretty much exactly what I'd like to have. It's a little pricey, tough to get (CA only per the website), hard on the warranty, and so on. But the concept is exactly right. I'm not ready to put down $55K plus the price of a new XB for one. But if that were a commercially available option from Toyota, at roughly the price of a Prius, I'd be a buyer.l
     
  18. bryanmsi

    bryanmsi New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    53
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chogan @ Oct 29 2006, 06:10 PM) [snapback]340457[/snapback]</div>
    Getting a 3000LB car around for the same fuel economy as an 1800lb car is a HUGE accomplishment. If you put a 1200 pound trailer on that 1986 Honda, if the Honda could even pull it, you'd clamp down its performance and fuel economy something fierce. Or compare the Prius to a 3000 lb car from 1986 and see what the comparable mileage is like. And that doesn't count the emissions hardware missing from the Honda but present on the Prius.

    However, it is also true that if you are a one-passenger car driver, we've simply used 20 years of technology to allow you to haul around yourself plus 3000 pounds of automobile for the same fuel economy as you used to be able to haul yourself and 1800 pounds. On that score, measured at the gas pump, the 86 Honda and the 2006 Prius are identical as commuter vehicles. But boy, is the Prius safer and more comfortable.

    One thing is true - expensive gas in the 1970s led to efficiency in the 80s, cheap gas in the 80s led to more horsepower and size in the 90s. Since 2000 - 2004 were all about the peak of this power craze (similar to the late 1960s early 1970s), I wonder if the later half of this decade will start a return to economy?

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(darelldd @ Oct 29 2006, 06:31 PM) [snapback]340467[/snapback]</div>
    Maybe, but realize that the ICE as we know it can burn gasoline, natural gas, hydrogen gas, ethanol, methanol, and other short-chain hydrocarbons (and non-hydrocarbons in the case of pure H2) today, with almost no modification at all. All of those fuels can be generated synthetically from renewable resources. Have you read about the guy who produces crude oil from turkey guts that the Tyson plant produces? He claims he can make crude oil from any carbon-based biomass at an efficiency of almost 80%.

    And if you stretch ICE to include Diesel engines, then we can run them on all sorts of biofuels.

    I think the energy density of chemical fuel alone will probably make the ICE longevity much longer than we might otherwise expect. Even at 70% power loss (30% efficiency), gasoline has 1000% more energy than Lithium Ion packs. Even if there is just a single cylinder "limp home" engine present for those drained batteries, I think we'll not get many pure EVs very soon.

    What we really need to do is drop our consumption to the level where we can sustain it domestically, much as Brazil has done with its massive ethanol production. If they can be energy independent, so can we.
     
  19. David Beale

    David Beale Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    5,963
    1,981
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Let me get this straight. You want a car with more room than the Prius, but uses the same or less fuel? Dream on! Even the Camry Hybrid has -less- room than the Prius. It looses cargo space to the battery. It was not designed from the ground up as a hybrid, like the Prius was. The major thing that attracted me to the Prius was the efficient use of space inside it. I don't think you're going to find a vehicle made right now that is as efficient. If it's bigger on the outside, it's probably going to be heavier. If it's heavier, it's going to use more fuel.

    BTW, your "domestic made" requirement will rule out the Ford Escape. While the engine and hybrid components are Ford mostly, the body is Mazda.
     
  20. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I don't get why you don't just buy a second Prius. Just buy a different color.