1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Institutional Failure at Reuters

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by dbermanmd, Aug 7, 2006.

  1. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    What do you guys think about al-Reuters publishing obvioulsy Photoshopped pictures and other Hezbollah propaganda?

    Funny how al-NY Times and al-CNN did not cover this story either.

    At least we can all witness the side they are taking - no longer are they considered fair and balanced - and no wonder they are all losing eyeballs and money.
     
  2. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    HOT OFF THEIR PRESSES
    Comments one and all - or are we all assuming, I mean knowing that, the media IS biased against Israel?

    Reuters withdraws all photos by Lebanese freelance
    07 Aug 2006 14:38:33 GMT
    Source: Reuters
    Printable view | Email this article | RSS XML [-] Text [+]

    Background
    Lebanon crisis
    Israeli-Palestinian conflict
    More
    LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Reuters withdrew all 920 photographs by a freelance Lebanese photographer from its database on Monday after an urgent review of his work showed he had altered two images from the conflict between Israel and the armed group Hizbollah.

    Global Picture Editor Tom Szlukovenyi called the measure precautionary but said the fact that two of the images by photographer Adnan Hajj had been manipulated undermined trust in his entire body of work.

    "There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image," Szlukovenyi said in a statement.

    "Reuters has zero tolerance for any doctoring of pictures and constantly reminds its photographers, both staff and freelance, of this strict and unalterable policy."

    The news and information agency announced the decision in an advisory note to its photo service subscribers. The note also said Reuters had tightened editing procedures for photographs from the conflict and apologised for the case.

    Removing the images from the Reuters database excludes them from future sale.

    Reuters ended its relationship with Hajj on Sunday after it found that a photograph he had taken of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on suburban Beirut had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more and darker smoke rising from buildings.

    An immediate enquiry began into Hajj's other work.

    It established on Monday that a photograph of an Israeli F-16 fighter over Nabatiyeh, southern Lebanon and dated Aug 2, had also been doctored to increase the number of flares dropped by the plane from one to three.

    "Manipulating photographs in this way is entirely unacceptable and contrary to all the principles consistently held by Reuters throughout its long and distinguished history. It undermines not only our reputation but also the good name of all our photographers," Szlukovenyi said.

    "This doesn't mean that every one of his 920 photographs in our database was altered. We know that not to be the case from the majority of images we have looked at so far but we need to act swiftly and in a precautionary manner."

    The two altered photographs were among 43 that Hajj filed directly to the Reuters Global Pictures Desk since the start of the conflict on July 12 rather than through an editor in Beirut, as was the case with the great majority of his images.

    Filing drills have been tightened in Lebanon and only senior staff will now edit pictures from the Middle East on the Global Pictures Desk, with the final check undertaken by the Editor-in-Charge, Reuters said.

    Hajj worked for Reuters as a non-staff contributing photographer from 1993 until 2003 and again since April 2005. Most of his work was in sports photography, much of it outside Lebanon.

    Hajj was not in Beirut on Monday and was not responding to calls. He told Reuters on Sunday that the image of the Israeli air strike on Beirut had dust marks which he had wanted to remove.

    Questions about the accuracy of the photograph arose after it appeared on news Web sites on Saturday.

    Several blogs, including a number which accuse the media of distorted coverage of the Middle East conflict, said the photograph had been doctored.

    AlertNet news is provided by
     
  3. wstander

    wstander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    982
    1
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 7 2006, 08:22 AM) [snapback]299022[/snapback]</div>

    But, but, but we all know that only the Israeli weapons actually exploded and harm people and property :)

    None of the Hezbollah weapons EVER hurt anyone, right B) B)
     
  4. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(wstander @ Aug 7 2006, 12:03 PM) [snapback]299044[/snapback]</div>
    You got it wrong - I am sorry - only Jews/Israeli Arabs were killed or injured. Too bad they dont want to strap dynamite around their waist and blow up busses in Lebanon...the press loves that stuff too - they could look into what made Chaim do this - the oppression, the brutal occupation of his land, the killing of his 11 or 12 brothers and sisters by those nasty Arabs, his other 8 or 9 sibblings in their jails...... and then Reuters could photoshop some pictures for added benefit.. and the cries of massacre would ring out......
     
  5. wstander

    wstander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    982
    1
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 7 2006, 09:25 AM) [snapback]299064[/snapback]</div>

    Sigh, I was bing sarcastic.

    I know that weapons from both sides do damage....nevermind

    FWIW: I have not trusted Reuter's for years; they were one of the first to ban the terms 'terror' and 'terrorist' from their lexicons.
     
  6. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(wstander @ Aug 7 2006, 12:52 PM) [snapback]299083[/snapback]</div>
    I knew you were being sarcastic B) So was I.

    Reuters turns out to be one of the terrorists - I think this was with their full knowledge and approval.